irvinehomeowner said:@akim:
Not sure if agreeing to Indie's terms works to your original premise.
You've admitted that prices will probably drop in the next 2 years, so automatically you're in a bad position... I don't recall you taking a stance that a Cortona will go up in price by 2014... just that it won't drop by 20%.
Since Indie won't bet on a 20% drop, a more fair bet would be to decide a drop threshold you both can agree on as the over/under... much like Indie did with a few Turtle Rock homes last year.
akim997 said:irvinehomeowner said:@akim:
Not sure if agreeing to Indie's terms works to your original premise.
You've admitted that prices will probably drop in the next 2 years, so automatically you're in a bad position... I don't recall you taking a stance that a Cortona will go up in price by 2014... just that it won't drop by 20%.
Since Indie won't bet on a 20% drop, a more fair bet would be to decide a drop threshold you both can agree on as the over/under... much like Indie did with a few Turtle Rock homes last year.
well, since the original premise is out.. yes, I have less conviction and i dont know if i'd be willing to lose that much on a coin flip... i was just wondering if he (or IHS) would be willing to gamble on a large drop (which is what i'd be willing to bet a lot of money on)... ill think about this, and im not opposed to forming some sort of wager.
i think we can all agree that indie's official stance 1) market is currently overpriced 2) real estate is downward trending 3) believes TIC's product offering is weak and that he wouldnt buy anything 4) $100,000 is meaningless to him
akim997 said:i think we can all agree that indie's official stance 1) market is currently overpriced 2) real estate is downward trending 3) believes TIC's product offering is weak and that he wouldnt buy anything 4) $100,000 is meaningless to him
akim997 said:haha.. of course i had my chest out when the bet was in my favor. wouldnt you? i (perhaps mistakenly) thought that indie and ihs were super bearish with regards to irvine housing, so i figured if they are willing to take the bet, why not?
i have a strong opinion that Irvine won't be that weak in the years to come, so if someone is willing to bet against a strong conviction of mine, why wouldnt i bet? based on your comment, you seem to agree that irvine prices are more stable than bubble. why would you call it one-sided and lame, though? who knows, maybe somebody here DOES think that prices will drop dramatically in the future. so are you now saying that EVERYONE here all of a sudden agrees that prices are high, but that there is support that would prevent a large drop and that any notion to the contrary is one-sided and lame?
IndieDev said:As my #1 fan IHO...
I believe you are your #1 fan.IndieDev said:I am generally respected and well loved on this forum.
And it's "obvious" that you're not sure they will drop 20% either.Indie said:... what do you think about Cortana's current prices? It's obvious akim doesn't think they will hold up in 2 years.
irvinehomeshopper said:TIC will not reduce price so easily. TIC will shut down construction of new homes and shift the crews on the building apartments. TIC will starve all of you then you all will just pay any price after the pend up demand period just like the last time. You are all crack addicts and TIC is the drug dealer.
irvinehomeowner said:And it's "obvious" that you're not sure they will drop 20% either.
Except IHS is saying it as satire and jest, while you actually believe that asinine theory.But... even IHS has said... they could just stop building new homes:
why I think Irvine has non-fundamental price resilience.
IndieDev said:rkp, I can't control the way data makes you feel, or the way you react to bad news. That's an emotional response, which I understand is highly tied to home purchases, and I make no apologies for that. I will say if you think $325 a sqft in Woodbury is the bottom, then that is a pipe dream thought up in a world known as fantasy land. When it comes to data, and trends, models based on solid fundamentals are rarely wrong, and the data doesn't show Woodbury bottoming out anytime soon.
That being said, if you can take $75,000 (or more) on the chin, then that's up to you to decide. But in general it's a pretty dumb move for someone who fully expects to lose $75,000 or more on a purchase in 1-2 years to make said purchase. I'm not trying to "hurt your feelings" or "blast you", because everyone's situation is different, that's just the way the market is now. If your feelings are still hurt, I understand rkp, that's not my intention.
Let's be honest trace, I make this thread exciting which is why you're here following me around...Threads I am heavily involved in on TI get the most page views and posts, and generally the most posters participating. I am generally respected and well loved on this forum.
Neither Indie or me are discouraging you to buy. If you exercise more patient the future fundamental effect on housing will force TIC to build a better house to entice you. That is precisely the point.
You not taking the bet at simple face value is enough of a hint. You tried to dodge it by framing it in a way that it needed a purpose or had to be less complex... or did qwerty not explain that to you already?IndieDev said:irvinehomeowner said:And it's "obvious" that you're not sure they will drop 20% either.
Which I never claimed or hinted at, mentioned, predicted, or even thought of.
Not really... he says they will move the construction to apartments to preserve the work force... but it's still halting the building of new projects. They did it for Orchard Hills, mid-way into Woodbury and Portola and they can do it again. Whether or not it helped preserve a further deterioration of prices is what we disagree on... but the point is if TIC wants to stop building based on demand or Bren's whim... they can. New home construction is NOT their sole source of revenue.Indie said:Except IHS is saying it as satire and jest, while you actually believe that asinine theory.But... even IHS has said... they could just stop building new homes:
So that still means they will stop building new homes. Do you remember what the original opening date of Orchard Hills was?irvinehomeshopper said:The temporary strategy is shifting crews to building apartments at Cypress Village and South Central LA.
IndieDev said:traceimage said:IndieDev said:traceimage said:IndieDev said:The Motor Court Company said:This is the most amateurish counter-bet I have seen. At least propose a widely accepted source for medium price that can be mutually agreed upon and define how much lower. You can easily have statistical fluctuations of +/- 3%.
IndieDev said:I am a bear when it comes to Irvine, and I will accept your wager ($100 to $100,000, whatever cash you have after escrow), but the wager I will counter with is that the median Irvine sold prices YOY will be lower in February 2013 than they are now in February 2012.
I don't know any sources for "medium price", nor would I use such a metric. Maybe I'm too amateur.
Considering you think going to small claims court is not about the money, but about the principal...let's go easy on someone who mixes up "median" and "medium."
My iPhone 4GS made that auto-correction. It's a limitation of the technology.
Right. Of course it did.
Let's be honest trace, I make this thread exciting which is why you're here following me around.
I didn't stay stop construction... I said stop or slow "new home" construction... which is what you just said... again.irvinehomeshopper said:TIC can't stop construction period. In the meantime there is a temporary hold on new homes while the crews are working on apartments. Orchard Hills is the crown jewel of TIC 's development so TIC will wait for pricing recovery.
rkp said:IHS actually clarifies when pressed on why the build quality is bad or what to look for so he is at least helpful.