irvinehomeshopper
Well-known member
I just want all of you to know I missed my 200 roses appointment in irvine because of this thread.
IndieDev said:irvinehomeshopper said:Sorry VP, Indie is dead on with the lenders' cautious approach today. They are all afraid of over leveraged homeowners going into default.
The thing is, he thinks I'm trying to trash him when I say someone who makes $90,000 can't get a loan for a $700,000 home. It's a simple fact, I'm not injecting my personal bias, or opinion into the matter. It's simply not possible unless you find a suicidal banking institution.
IndieDev said:irvinehomeshopper said:Sorry VP, Indie is dead on with the lenders' cautious approach today. They are all afraid of over leveraged homeowners going into default.
The thing is, he thinks I'm trying to trash him when I say someone who makes $90,000 can't get a loan for a $700,000 home. It's a simple fact, I'm not injecting my personal bias, or opinion into the matter. It's simply not possible unless you find a suicidal banking institution.
IndieDev said:irvinehomeshopper said:Sorry VP, Indie is dead on with the lenders' cautious approach today. They are all afraid of over leveraged homeowners going into default.
The thing is, he thinks I'm trying to trash him when I say someone who makes $90,000 can't get a loan for a $700,000 home. It's a simple fact, I'm not injecting my personal bias, or opinion into the matter. It's simply not possible unless you find a suicidal banking institution.
Which is probably why it don't remember that price back then, $150k was the top of my price range (I was just single income)... plus it did have Mello Roos and that was hurting my buy amount.irvinehomeshopper said:Don't forget upgrades and other items like landscaped yard raised the final price of the home at closing. Seriously the basic back in 1995 had a steering wheel and the basic today is like the Civic elevated on 4 piles of bricks in Santa Ana.
villagepeople said:IndieDev said:irvinehomeshopper said:Sorry VP, Indie is dead on with the lenders' cautious approach today. They are all afraid of over leveraged homeowners going into default.
The thing is, he thinks I'm trying to trash him when I say someone who makes $90,000 can't get a loan for a $700,000 home. It's a simple fact, I'm not injecting my personal bias, or opinion into the matter. It's simply not possible unless you find a suicidal banking institution.
Like I said I'll admit it when I'm wrong...Assuming 1.9% prop tax + mello, which i missed that would mean you need a $126,833 salary...
irvinehomeowner said:(CalPac was the master of recycling floorplans... and still is as IrvinePac).
IndieDev said:villagepeople said:IndieDev said:irvinehomeshopper said:Sorry VP, Indie is dead on with the lenders' cautious approach today. They are all afraid of over leveraged homeowners going into default.
The thing is, he thinks I'm trying to trash him when I say someone who makes $90,000 can't get a loan for a $700,000 home. It's a simple fact, I'm not injecting my personal bias, or opinion into the matter. It's simply not possible unless you find a suicidal banking institution.
Like I said I'll admit it when I'm wrong...Assuming 1.9% prop tax + mello, which i missed that would mean you need a $126,833 salary...
I don't understand how you can be this wrong over and over again. Are you using some sort of online calculator? How are you getting your numbers? Does SGIP still post here? Can he chime in so villagepeople knows how wrong he is. I feel like I'm babysitting a kindergarten here.
irvinehomeshopper said:You weren't looking hard enough!
Here is the price sheet from 9/95 Phase 5
Brindisi at Westpark
49 La Ronda
Irvine, CA 92714
(714) 559-0404
California Pacific Homes
Cortese-Plan 1 (from $150,000)
2 Bedrooms/2 baths 2 car garage
Amafi-Plan 2 (from $174,000)
3 Bedrooms/2 baths 2 car garage
Venezia-Plan 3 (from $190,200)
3 Bedrooms/2-1/2 baths
2 car garage
Firenze-Plan 4 (from $204,000)
3 Bedrooms/3 baths
2 car garage
I can photograph the price sheet if you want to see it.
irvinehomeowner said:Actually my friend bought a detached condo.
I don't think Brindisi was $150k in mid-90s... I would have seen it.
@IndieDev: What product mix am I confusing?. I'm comparing apples to apples... resale 2/1+SFRs in the mid 90s to resale 2/1+ SFRs now... something I was intimate with in the mid 90s (including attached products).
irvinehomeshopper said:irvinehomeowner said:(CalPac was the master of recycling floorplans... and still is as IrvinePac).
I think you have your facts mixed up. Irvine Pacific is located in Newport Beach while California Pacific Homes is in the Irvine Spectrum. They are 2 different companies. BBB lists them as two active and separate companies.
villagepeople said:irvinehomeshopper said:irvinehomeowner said:(CalPac was the master of recycling floorplans... and still is as IrvinePac).
I think you have your facts mixed up. Irvine Pacific is located in Newport Beach while California Pacific Homes is in the Irvine Spectrum. They are 2 different companies. BBB lists them as two active and separate companies.
IHO is right. I don't know about what corps are set up for what and where they are headquartered...but my cousin bought a cal pac... I bought an Irvine pacific... The service people are the same... Some of the fixtures and stuff are exactly the same.
You also have to include homeowners insurance and HOA which may increase the cost by an additional $200-$300 per month. As an example, I wouldn't be comfortable having that high of mortgage payment unless I made over $150k a year.villagepeople said:IndieDev said:villagepeople said:IndieDev said:irvinehomeshopper said:Sorry VP, Indie is dead on with the lenders' cautious approach today. They are all afraid of over leveraged homeowners going into default.
The thing is, he thinks I'm trying to trash him when I say someone who makes $90,000 can't get a loan for a $700,000 home. It's a simple fact, I'm not injecting my personal bias, or opinion into the matter. It's simply not possible unless you find a suicidal banking institution.
Like I said I'll admit it when I'm wrong...Assuming 1.9% prop tax + mello, which i missed that would mean you need a $126,833 salary...
I don't understand how you can be this wrong over and over again. Are you using some sort of online calculator? How are you getting your numbers? Does SGIP still post here? Can he chime in so villagepeople knows how wrong he is. I feel like I'm babysitting a kindergarten here.
690,000*.8=552000@4.25 360 pmts = 2715
2715+(690k*.019/12)=3807
(3 807 / .36) * 12 = 126 900
Where am I wrong?
USCTrojanCPA said:You also have to include homeowners insurance and HOA which may increase the cost by an additional $200-$300 per month. As an example, I wouldn't be comfortable having that high of mortgage payment unless I made over $150k a year.villagepeople said:IndieDev said:villagepeople said:IndieDev said:irvinehomeshopper said:Sorry VP, Indie is dead on with the lenders' cautious approach today. They are all afraid of over leveraged homeowners going into default.
The thing is, he thinks I'm trying to trash him when I say someone who makes $90,000 can't get a loan for a $700,000 home. It's a simple fact, I'm not injecting my personal bias, or opinion into the matter. It's simply not possible unless you find a suicidal banking institution.
Like I said I'll admit it when I'm wrong...Assuming 1.9% prop tax + mello, which i missed that would mean you need a $126,833 salary...
I don't understand how you can be this wrong over and over again. Are you using some sort of online calculator? How are you getting your numbers? Does SGIP still post here? Can he chime in so villagepeople knows how wrong he is. I feel like I'm babysitting a kindergarten here.
690,000*.8=552000@4.25 360 pmts = 2715
2715+(690k*.019/12)=3807
(3 807 / .36) * 12 = 126 900
Where am I wrong?
IndieDev said:He's also using the back end ratio as his front end ratio.
USCTrojanCPA said:Wasn't 94/95 the previous bottom for housing after the whole RTC mess? Wouldn't it make more sense using 98/99 prices as that's right before the start of the bubble?
IndieDev said:irvinehomeshopper said:Sorry VP, Indie is dead on with the lenders' cautious approach today. They are all afraid of over leveraged homeowners going into default.
The thing is, he thinks I'm trying to trash him when I say someone who makes $90,000 can't get a loan for a $700,000 home. It's a simple fact, I'm not injecting my personal bias, or opinion into the matter. It's simply not possible unless you find a suicidal banking institution.
IndieDev said:USCTrojanCPA said:Wasn't 94/95 the previous bottom for housing after the whole RTC mess? Wouldn't it make more sense using 98/99 prices as that's right before the start of the bubble?
I think early 1970, sometime before the Energy Crisis. That would give you the biggest yield, especially if you bought $10,000 lots in Laguna Beach.
Liar Loan said:IndieDev said:USCTrojanCPA said:Wasn't 94/95 the previous bottom for housing after the whole RTC mess? Wouldn't it make more sense using 98/99 prices as that's right before the start of the bubble?
I think early 1970, sometime before the Energy Crisis. That would give you the biggest yield, especially if you bought $10,000 lots in Laguna Beach.
Completely agree with you. 1970's inflation allowed people to get a real mortgage rate that was negative while causing their property values to double every few years. Property taxes were also doubling, but Prop 13 took care of that.