irvinehomeowner
Well-known member
zubs said:why argue that 1+1 = 5.
You mean some + some = some.
zubs said:why argue that 1+1 = 5.
The slowdown that you and others predicted hasn't really materialized in terms of significant price drops. Do we wait another year? Is December still your magical month of when prices will catch up to volume?irvinehomeowner said:meccos12 said:irvinehomeowner said:Since I have no idea if there is a more recent article from OCR, here is CV"s post again quoting the last one for Irvine:
4. Irvine 92602: $1,195,000 median, down 2.9% in a year. Price rank? 12th of 83. Sales of 37 vs. 88 a year earlier, a decline of 58.0% in 12 months.
5. Irvine 92603: $1,267,500 median, up 3.9% in a year. Price rank? No. 10 of 83. Sales of 24 vs. 38 a year earlier, a decline of 36.8% in 12 months.
6. Irvine 92604: $761,250 median, down 1.6% in a year. Price rank? No. 34 of 83. Sales of 28 vs. 24 a year earlier, a gain of 16.7% in 12 months.
7. Irvine 92606: $872,500 median, up 1.3% in a year. Price rank? No. 23 of 83. Sales of 14 vs. 16 a year earlier, a decline of 12.5% in 12 months.
8. Irvine 92612: $715,000 median, down 5.3% in a year. Price rank? No. 43 of 83. Sales of 61 vs. 38 a year earlier, a gain of 60.5% in 12 months.
9. Irvine 92614: $725,500 median, down 11% in a year. Price rank? No. 40 of 83. Sales of 30 vs. 27 a year earlier, a gain of 11.1% in 12 months.
10. Irvine 92618: $897,500 median, down 0.8% in a year. Price rank? No. 21 of 83. Sales of 127 vs. 97 a year earlier, a gain of 30.9% in 12 months.
11. Irvine 92620: $958,000 median, down 6.6% in a year. Price rank? No. 19 of 83. Sales of 67 vs. 131 a year earlier, a decline of 48.9% in 12 months.
Only ONE Irvine zip down 11% according to that article. The next lowest, 6.6%. The average? If my math is right, down 2.9%. And average drop in volume? About 4.6%.
such a simpleton...
Wow, such a great comment.
So what's your point?
meccos12 said:@IHO,
I think anyone who has been on this blog knows that you can continue non stop with your endless gibberish, so let me just summarize it here and end it. You "debunked" my "claim" that "some" homes dropped 11% because only "one" zip code fell by that much? Is that correct? Ok great. lets move on. LOL
Ahh... the insult and then let's move on tactic. Ok... here's a better summary:
The slowdown that you and others predicted hasn't really materialized in terms of significant price drops. Do we wait another year? Is December still your magical month of when prices will catch up to volume?
And don't get me wrong, one would think that such a decrease in volume would result in larger price drops so what happened? Someone thought that SALT would have a big impact but others have said that they either paid less, paid more or paid the same so maybe that was neutral? Lower interest rates maybe? Someone predicted low rates "sailed" but that was wrong too.
And based on those OCReg articles, even volume isn't really all that much lower in Irvine/Tustin than it was the year before, so what's going on?
But let's talk now... April and May prices are less meaningful today. What is your take on current volume and prices? You hit me with Steve Thomas data a year ago, what does that data say now?
zubs said:As long as the recession happens like it's suppose to..then yeah bottom 2021...and scrape along for 2 years...2023 back up baby!!!
WTTCHMN said:Homebuying in Irvine, Tustin tumbles 14% in Orange County?s worst first half in 8 years, but IHO says it's still seasonal
https://www.ocregister.com/2019/08/...n-orange-countys-worst-first-half-in-8-years/
WTTCHMN said:in case IHO bitches that he can't read the article due to the paywall:
5. Irvine 92603: $1,087,500 median, down 17.9% in a year. Price rank? No. 10 of 83. Sales of 114 vs. 144 a year earlier, a decline of 20.8% in 12 months.
6. Irvine 92604: $750,000 median, down 3.1% in a year. Price rank? No. 36 of 83. Sales of 111 vs. 136 a year earlier, a decline of 18.4% in 12 months.
7. Irvine 92606: $799,500 median, down 3.1% in a year. Price rank? No. 26 of 83. Sales of 64 vs. 79 a year earlier, a decline of 19.0% in 12 months.
8. Irvine 92612: $663,500 median, down 11.5% in a year. Price rank? No. 52 of 83. Sales of 205 vs. 194 a year earlier, a gain of 5.7% in 12 months.
9. Irvine 92614: $730,000 median, down 7% in a year. Price rank? No. 42 of 83. Sales of 111 vs. 118 a year earlier, a decline of 5.9% in 12 months.
10. Irvine 92618: $966,750 median, up 7.1% in a year. Price rank? No. 14 of 83. Sales of 621 vs. 688 a year earlier, a decline of 9.7% in 12 months.
11. Irvine 92620: $1,030,000 median, up 0.5% in a year. Price rank? No. 11 of 83. Sales of 366 vs. 630 a year earlier, a decline of 41.9% in 12 months.
https://www.ocregister.com/2019/08/...n-orange-countys-worst-first-half-in-8-years/
WTTCHMN said:in case IHO bitches that he can't read the article due to the paywall:
5. Irvine 92603: $1,087,500 median, down 17.9% in a year. Price rank? No. 10 of 83. Sales of 114 vs. 144 a year earlier, a decline of 20.8% in 12 months.
6. Irvine 92604: $750,000 median, down 3.1% in a year. Price rank? No. 36 of 83. Sales of 111 vs. 136 a year earlier, a decline of 18.4% in 12 months.
7. Irvine 92606: $799,500 median, down 3.1% in a year. Price rank? No. 26 of 83. Sales of 64 vs. 79 a year earlier, a decline of 19.0% in 12 months.
8. Irvine 92612: $663,500 median, down 11.5% in a year. Price rank? No. 52 of 83. Sales of 205 vs. 194 a year earlier, a gain of 5.7% in 12 months.
9. Irvine 92614: $730,000 median, down 7% in a year. Price rank? No. 42 of 83. Sales of 111 vs. 118 a year earlier, a decline of 5.9% in 12 months.
10. Irvine 92618: $966,750 median, up 7.1% in a year. Price rank? No. 14 of 83. Sales of 621 vs. 688 a year earlier, a decline of 9.7% in 12 months.
11. Irvine 92620: $1,030,000 median, up 0.5% in a year. Price rank? No. 11 of 83. Sales of 366 vs. 630 a year earlier, a decline of 41.9% in 12 months.
https://www.ocregister.com/2019/08/...n-orange-countys-worst-first-half-in-8-years/
WTTCHMN said:in case IHO bitches that he can't read the article due to the paywall:
Mety said:WTTCHMN said:in case IHO bitches that he can't read the article due to the paywall:
5. Irvine 92603: $1,087,500 median, down 17.9% in a year. Price rank? No. 10 of 83. Sales of 114 vs. 144 a year earlier, a decline of 20.8% in 12 months.
6. Irvine 92604: $750,000 median, down 3.1% in a year. Price rank? No. 36 of 83. Sales of 111 vs. 136 a year earlier, a decline of 18.4% in 12 months.
7. Irvine 92606: $799,500 median, down 3.1% in a year. Price rank? No. 26 of 83. Sales of 64 vs. 79 a year earlier, a decline of 19.0% in 12 months.
8. Irvine 92612: $663,500 median, down 11.5% in a year. Price rank? No. 52 of 83. Sales of 205 vs. 194 a year earlier, a gain of 5.7% in 12 months.
9. Irvine 92614: $730,000 median, down 7% in a year. Price rank? No. 42 of 83. Sales of 111 vs. 118 a year earlier, a decline of 5.9% in 12 months.
10. Irvine 92618: $966,750 median, up 7.1% in a year. Price rank? No. 14 of 83. Sales of 621 vs. 688 a year earlier, a decline of 9.7% in 12 months.
11. Irvine 92620: $1,030,000 median, up 0.5% in a year. Price rank? No. 11 of 83. Sales of 366 vs. 630 a year earlier, a decline of 41.9% in 12 months.
https://www.ocregister.com/2019/08/...n-orange-countys-worst-first-half-in-8-years/
Wait, I thought last year was the worst slow down in last 8 years. Now it's this year? Man, are we going to have that every year now?
Interesting though that newer Irvine zip codes have the median up. 92618 for 7.1% up? That's pretty high. I guess it's because of the new builds.
Also University Park has a gain on sales by 5.7%. Those attached SFRs and single floor homes are real attractive especially compare to modern tri-level homes.
zubs said:92614 according to Trulia for JUL 2019 is $775,000
https://www.trulia.com/real_estate/92614-Irvine/market-trends/
why argue that 1+1 = 5. Just let the data speak for itself.
Mety said:Wait, I thought last year was the worst slow down in last 8 years. Now it's this year? Man, are we going to have that every year now?
zubs said:Kenko held his money about 6 months after you said a slow down. He actually benefited from holding. But price jumped back up afterwards. You can see it in the graphs.
zubs said:Trulia, redfin and zillow all have median prices higher than OC register.
Which one do you believe?
I would believe in our own TI realtors take on the market then any of these 4 sources.
eyephone said:Mety said:WTTCHMN said:in case IHO bitches that he can't read the article due to the paywall:
5. Irvine 92603: $1,087,500 median, down 17.9% in a year. Price rank? No. 10 of 83. Sales of 114 vs. 144 a year earlier, a decline of 20.8% in 12 months.
6. Irvine 92604: $750,000 median, down 3.1% in a year. Price rank? No. 36 of 83. Sales of 111 vs. 136 a year earlier, a decline of 18.4% in 12 months.
7. Irvine 92606: $799,500 median, down 3.1% in a year. Price rank? No. 26 of 83. Sales of 64 vs. 79 a year earlier, a decline of 19.0% in 12 months.
8. Irvine 92612: $663,500 median, down 11.5% in a year. Price rank? No. 52 of 83. Sales of 205 vs. 194 a year earlier, a gain of 5.7% in 12 months.
9. Irvine 92614: $730,000 median, down 7% in a year. Price rank? No. 42 of 83. Sales of 111 vs. 118 a year earlier, a decline of 5.9% in 12 months.
10. Irvine 92618: $966,750 median, up 7.1% in a year. Price rank? No. 14 of 83. Sales of 621 vs. 688 a year earlier, a decline of 9.7% in 12 months.
11. Irvine 92620: $1,030,000 median, up 0.5% in a year. Price rank? No. 11 of 83. Sales of 366 vs. 630 a year earlier, a decline of 41.9% in 12 months.
https://www.ocregister.com/2019/08/...n-orange-countys-worst-first-half-in-8-years/
Wait, I thought last year was the worst slow down in last 8 years. Now it's this year? Man, are we going to have that every year now?
Interesting though that newer Irvine zip codes have the median up. 92618 for 7.1% up? That's pretty high. I guess it's because of the new builds.
Also University Park has a gain on sales by 5.7%. Those attached SFRs and single floor homes are real attractive especially compare to modern tri-level homes.
You didn?t believe meccos, kenko, and I?