When would be next housing Bottom?

NEW -> Contingent Buyer Assistance Program
irvinehomeowner said:
meccos12 said:
irvinehomeowner said:
Since I have no idea if there is a more recent article from OCR, here is CV"s post again quoting the last one for Irvine:

4. Irvine 92602: $1,195,000 median, down 2.9% in a year. Price rank? 12th of 83. Sales of 37 vs. 88 a year earlier, a decline of 58.0% in 12 months.

5. Irvine 92603: $1,267,500 median, up 3.9% in a year. Price rank? No. 10 of 83. Sales of 24 vs. 38 a year earlier, a decline of 36.8% in 12 months.

6. Irvine 92604: $761,250 median, down 1.6% in a year. Price rank? No. 34 of 83. Sales of 28 vs. 24 a year earlier, a gain of 16.7% in 12 months.

7. Irvine 92606: $872,500 median, up 1.3% in a year. Price rank? No. 23 of 83. Sales of 14 vs. 16 a year earlier, a decline of 12.5% in 12 months.

8. Irvine 92612: $715,000 median, down 5.3% in a year. Price rank? No. 43 of 83. Sales of 61 vs. 38 a year earlier, a gain of 60.5% in 12 months.

9. Irvine 92614: $725,500 median, down 11% in a year. Price rank? No. 40 of 83. Sales of 30 vs. 27 a year earlier, a gain of 11.1% in 12 months.

10. Irvine 92618: $897,500 median, down 0.8% in a year. Price rank? No. 21 of 83. Sales of 127 vs. 97 a year earlier, a gain of 30.9% in 12 months.

11. Irvine 92620: $958,000 median, down 6.6% in a year. Price rank? No. 19 of 83. Sales of 67 vs. 131 a year earlier, a decline of 48.9% in 12 months.

Only ONE Irvine zip down 11% according to that article. The next lowest, 6.6%. The average? If my math is right, down 2.9%. And average drop in volume? About 4.6%.

such a simpleton... 

Wow, such a great comment.

So what's your point?

meccos12 said:
@IHO,

I think anyone who has been on this blog knows that you can continue non stop with your endless gibberish, so let me just summarize it here and end it.  You "debunked" my "claim" that "some" homes dropped 11% because only "one" zip code fell by that much?  Is that correct?  Ok great.  lets move on.  LOL

Ahh... the insult and then let's move on tactic. Ok... here's a better summary:

The slowdown that you and others predicted hasn't really materialized in terms of significant price drops. Do we wait another year? Is December still your magical month of when prices will catch up to volume?

And don't get me wrong, one would think that such a decrease in volume would result in larger price drops so what happened? Someone thought that SALT would have a big impact but others have said that they either paid less, paid more or paid the same so maybe that was neutral? Lower interest rates maybe? Someone predicted low rates "sailed" but that was wrong too.

And based on those OCReg articles, even volume isn't really all that much lower in Irvine/Tustin than it was the year before, so what's going on?

But let's talk now... April and May prices are less meaningful today. What is your take on current volume and prices? You hit me with Steve Thomas data a year ago, what does that data say now?
The slowdown that you and others predicted hasn't really materialized in terms of significant price drops. Do we wait another year? Is December still your magical month of when prices will catch up to volume?

Take it from a long time owners like IHO, and you will be better of in the long run vs. waiting game.

Ok, so December is only 4 months away. Time to line up and get ready. The REAL slow down will start happening, or is it NOT!




 
What are you guys talking about? Housing bottom was 2011... or was it 2012?  :D

In all seriousness, the op suspects it will be 2021. Anyone with him/her?
 
As long as the recession happens like it's suppose to..then yeah bottom 2021...and scrape along for 2 years...2023 back up baby!!!
 
zubs said:
As long as the recession happens like it's suppose to..then yeah bottom 2021...and scrape along for 2 years...2023 back up baby!!!

If the majority suspects that, then so many will start buying again from 2021 so it might not ever hit the bottom. But who knows, right?

Also reading again from the page 1, there were some RE counseling expecting this year to be 3.6% rise. Has that been the case yet?

 
in case IHO bitches that he can't read the article due to the paywall:

5. Irvine 92603: $1,087,500 median, down 17.9% in a year. Price rank? No. 10 of 83. Sales of 114 vs. 144 a year earlier, a decline of 20.8% in 12 months.

6. Irvine 92604: $750,000 median, down 3.1% in a year. Price rank? No. 36 of 83. Sales of 111 vs. 136 a year earlier, a decline of 18.4% in 12 months.

7. Irvine 92606: $799,500 median, down 3.1% in a year. Price rank? No. 26 of 83. Sales of 64 vs. 79 a year earlier, a decline of 19.0% in 12 months.

8. Irvine 92612: $663,500 median, down 11.5% in a year. Price rank? No. 52 of 83. Sales of 205 vs. 194 a year earlier, a gain of 5.7% in 12 months.

9. Irvine 92614: $730,000 median, down 7% in a year. Price rank? No. 42 of 83. Sales of 111 vs. 118 a year earlier, a decline of 5.9% in 12 months.

10. Irvine 92618: $966,750 median, up 7.1% in a year. Price rank? No. 14 of 83. Sales of 621 vs. 688 a year earlier, a decline of 9.7% in 12 months.

11. Irvine 92620: $1,030,000 median, up 0.5% in a year. Price rank? No. 11 of 83. Sales of 366 vs. 630 a year earlier, a decline of 41.9% in 12 months.
https://www.ocregister.com/2019/08/...n-orange-countys-worst-first-half-in-8-years/
 
WTTCHMN said:
in case IHO bitches that he can't read the article due to the paywall:

5. Irvine 92603: $1,087,500 median, down 17.9% in a year. Price rank? No. 10 of 83. Sales of 114 vs. 144 a year earlier, a decline of 20.8% in 12 months.

6. Irvine 92604: $750,000 median, down 3.1% in a year. Price rank? No. 36 of 83. Sales of 111 vs. 136 a year earlier, a decline of 18.4% in 12 months.

7. Irvine 92606: $799,500 median, down 3.1% in a year. Price rank? No. 26 of 83. Sales of 64 vs. 79 a year earlier, a decline of 19.0% in 12 months.

8. Irvine 92612: $663,500 median, down 11.5% in a year. Price rank? No. 52 of 83. Sales of 205 vs. 194 a year earlier, a gain of 5.7% in 12 months.

9. Irvine 92614: $730,000 median, down 7% in a year. Price rank? No. 42 of 83. Sales of 111 vs. 118 a year earlier, a decline of 5.9% in 12 months.

10. Irvine 92618: $966,750 median, up 7.1% in a year. Price rank? No. 14 of 83. Sales of 621 vs. 688 a year earlier, a decline of 9.7% in 12 months.

11. Irvine 92620: $1,030,000 median, up 0.5% in a year. Price rank? No. 11 of 83. Sales of 366 vs. 630 a year earlier, a decline of 41.9% in 12 months.
https://www.ocregister.com/2019/08/...n-orange-countys-worst-first-half-in-8-years/

Thanks for posting.
 
WTTCHMN said:
in case IHO bitches that he can't read the article due to the paywall:

5. Irvine 92603: $1,087,500 median, down 17.9% in a year. Price rank? No. 10 of 83. Sales of 114 vs. 144 a year earlier, a decline of 20.8% in 12 months.

6. Irvine 92604: $750,000 median, down 3.1% in a year. Price rank? No. 36 of 83. Sales of 111 vs. 136 a year earlier, a decline of 18.4% in 12 months.

7. Irvine 92606: $799,500 median, down 3.1% in a year. Price rank? No. 26 of 83. Sales of 64 vs. 79 a year earlier, a decline of 19.0% in 12 months.

8. Irvine 92612: $663,500 median, down 11.5% in a year. Price rank? No. 52 of 83. Sales of 205 vs. 194 a year earlier, a gain of 5.7% in 12 months.

9. Irvine 92614: $730,000 median, down 7% in a year. Price rank? No. 42 of 83. Sales of 111 vs. 118 a year earlier, a decline of 5.9% in 12 months.

10. Irvine 92618: $966,750 median, up 7.1% in a year. Price rank? No. 14 of 83. Sales of 621 vs. 688 a year earlier, a decline of 9.7% in 12 months.

11. Irvine 92620: $1,030,000 median, up 0.5% in a year. Price rank? No. 11 of 83. Sales of 366 vs. 630 a year earlier, a decline of 41.9% in 12 months.
https://www.ocregister.com/2019/08/...n-orange-countys-worst-first-half-in-8-years/

Wait, I thought last year was the worst slow down in last 8 years. Now it's this year?  Man, are we going to have that every year now?

Interesting though that newer Irvine zip codes have the median up. 92618 for 7.1% up? That's pretty high. I guess it's because of the new builds.

Also University Park has a gain on sales by 5.7%. Those attached SFRs and single floor homes are real attractive especially compare to modern tri-level homes.
 
WTTCHMN said:
in case IHO bitches that he can't read the article due to the paywall:

Yes, I'm still blocked. Can you please post the rest of the article?

I like OCReg's sensationalist headlines... I assume this is for June which we knew there would be a drop because Trulia already showed that back in June.

Averages median price drop for Irvine: 5% (although there seems to be one zip code missing because the previous articles have 8 zipcodes)

So again, although volume has indeed experienced a slowdown... still not a significant drop in price... why isn't that part of the headline?

"Sales volume tumbles 14% but prices still remain high!!"

Edit: Eight ) was translated as an emote.
 
Trulia, redfin and zillow all have median prices higher than OC register.
Which one do you believe?

I would believe in our own TI realtors take on the market then any of these 4 sources.
 
Mety said:
WTTCHMN said:
in case IHO bitches that he can't read the article due to the paywall:

5. Irvine 92603: $1,087,500 median, down 17.9% in a year. Price rank? No. 10 of 83. Sales of 114 vs. 144 a year earlier, a decline of 20.8% in 12 months.

6. Irvine 92604: $750,000 median, down 3.1% in a year. Price rank? No. 36 of 83. Sales of 111 vs. 136 a year earlier, a decline of 18.4% in 12 months.

7. Irvine 92606: $799,500 median, down 3.1% in a year. Price rank? No. 26 of 83. Sales of 64 vs. 79 a year earlier, a decline of 19.0% in 12 months.

8. Irvine 92612: $663,500 median, down 11.5% in a year. Price rank? No. 52 of 83. Sales of 205 vs. 194 a year earlier, a gain of 5.7% in 12 months.

9. Irvine 92614: $730,000 median, down 7% in a year. Price rank? No. 42 of 83. Sales of 111 vs. 118 a year earlier, a decline of 5.9% in 12 months.

10. Irvine 92618: $966,750 median, up 7.1% in a year. Price rank? No. 14 of 83. Sales of 621 vs. 688 a year earlier, a decline of 9.7% in 12 months.

11. Irvine 92620: $1,030,000 median, up 0.5% in a year. Price rank? No. 11 of 83. Sales of 366 vs. 630 a year earlier, a decline of 41.9% in 12 months.
https://www.ocregister.com/2019/08/...n-orange-countys-worst-first-half-in-8-years/

Wait, I thought last year was the worst slow down in last 8 years. Now it's this year?  Man, are we going to have that every year now?

Interesting though that newer Irvine zip codes have the median up. 92618 for 7.1% up? That's pretty high. I guess it's because of the new builds.

Also University Park has a gain on sales by 5.7%. Those attached SFRs and single floor homes are real attractive especially compare to modern tri-level homes.

You didn?t believe meccos, kenko, and I?
 
Kenko held his money about 6 months after you said a slow down.  He actually benefited from holding.  But price jumped back up afterwards.  You can see it in the graphs.  It's hard to time correctly.  However, if all the doom and gloom is true, then Kenko should not have bought already since we will be facing a real recession soon.
 
zubs said:
92614 according to Trulia for JUL 2019 is $775,000
https://www.trulia.com/real_estate/92614-Irvine/market-trends/


why argue that 1+1 = 5.  Just let the data speak for itself.

Yes. Let's look at more recent data as of July 31.

While 92614 is up YOY, Irvine is down 2.5%:
https://www.trulia.com/real_estate/Irvine-California/market-trends/

No. Bedrooms    May 1 - Jul 31  y-o-y    3 months prior  1 year prior  5 years prior
1 Bedroom        $426,000        -8.4%  $422,500        $465,000      $353,000
2 Bedroom        $615,000        -3.9%  $630,000        $640,000      $515,000
3 Bedroom        $840,000        + 0.2% $836,500        $838,000      $739,000
4 Bedroom        $1,161,000      + 0.5% $1,109,000      $1,155,000    $1,008,000
All Properties    $829,000        -2.5%  $835,000        $850,000      $803,750
 
Mety said:
Wait, I thought last year was the worst slow down in last 8 years. Now it's this year?  Man, are we going to have that every year now?

zubs said:
Kenko held his money about 6 months after you said a slow down.  He actually benefited from holding.  But price jumped back up afterwards.  You can see it in the graphs.

Seems seasonal doesn't it? Or is cyclical a better term? :)

 
zubs said:
Trulia, redfin and zillow all have median prices higher than OC register.
Which one do you believe?

I would believe in our own TI realtors take on the market then any of these 4 sources.

OC register actually might have more accurate price records. Trulia, Redfin and Zillow get their information from MLS. But what?s recorded in MLS isn?t always true. Sometimes they mess up and sometimes the realtors mess up on recording the prices with or without intention. I don?t know where OCR gets their resources from, but if they do from the state/city/government or somewhere more accurate than MLS, then OCR price records would be more accurate.
 
I have to ask. Iho: Are you or your wife a RE agent or affiallted to the RE industry? Because you are not taking this lightly.
(No offense just asking)
 
eyephone said:
Mety said:
WTTCHMN said:
in case IHO bitches that he can't read the article due to the paywall:

5. Irvine 92603: $1,087,500 median, down 17.9% in a year. Price rank? No. 10 of 83. Sales of 114 vs. 144 a year earlier, a decline of 20.8% in 12 months.

6. Irvine 92604: $750,000 median, down 3.1% in a year. Price rank? No. 36 of 83. Sales of 111 vs. 136 a year earlier, a decline of 18.4% in 12 months.

7. Irvine 92606: $799,500 median, down 3.1% in a year. Price rank? No. 26 of 83. Sales of 64 vs. 79 a year earlier, a decline of 19.0% in 12 months.

8. Irvine 92612: $663,500 median, down 11.5% in a year. Price rank? No. 52 of 83. Sales of 205 vs. 194 a year earlier, a gain of 5.7% in 12 months.

9. Irvine 92614: $730,000 median, down 7% in a year. Price rank? No. 42 of 83. Sales of 111 vs. 118 a year earlier, a decline of 5.9% in 12 months.

10. Irvine 92618: $966,750 median, up 7.1% in a year. Price rank? No. 14 of 83. Sales of 621 vs. 688 a year earlier, a decline of 9.7% in 12 months.

11. Irvine 92620: $1,030,000 median, up 0.5% in a year. Price rank? No. 11 of 83. Sales of 366 vs. 630 a year earlier, a decline of 41.9% in 12 months.
https://www.ocregister.com/2019/08/...n-orange-countys-worst-first-half-in-8-years/

Wait, I thought last year was the worst slow down in last 8 years. Now it's this year?  Man, are we going to have that every year now?

Interesting though that newer Irvine zip codes have the median up. 92618 for 7.1% up? That's pretty high. I guess it's because of the new builds.

Also University Park has a gain on sales by 5.7%. Those attached SFRs and single floor homes are real attractive especially compare to modern tri-level homes.

You didn?t believe meccos, kenko, and I?

In terms of RE business, I believe I have been pretty aligned with your idea. I also thought early last year was the highest peak that the price would come down from then. I think the sales have definitely slowed down, but the price seems to be acting different than how I expected. I thought the price would come down far worse by now, but it?s actually slightly up, but at the same time that?s normal because homes are supposed to gain 3% increase every year by default. Anything below 3% increase should actually be counted as a decrease. The slow sales should result in lower prices so it might take some time as meccos has said. I think the lower interest rates are kind of holding things from falling apart. We?ll see how it goes.
 
Back
Top