[quote author="bigmoneysalsa" date=1207739039][quote author="irvine123" date=1207734094]
Do you think Thomas 's math is wrong? Which part of Thomas's statement is BS?</blockquote>
I don't think his math is wrong, but his number is seasonal* and it's just as bad as it was last year, a year that saw massive price declines.</blockquote>
Uh IR, price declines from Jan 2007 to July 2007 were a total of 3%... If its just as bad as last year at the same time, that would mean prices are falling much much slower than they did during the tail end of 2007 and early 2008.
I think Thomas's general point is probably a good and simple one. Buying activity has picked up significantly and is close to returning, from an inventory perpective, to pre-credit crunch levels. DOMs are decreasing. Sales volumes are going up. Late March data for Irvine shows sales are off 30% YOY. Inventory for Irvine is 11-12% less YOY at this time. When you mixed those two together, you don't exactly have a recipe for massive price declines... If these were all true, and the market was "normal", price declines could/would level out.
Declines aren't likely to level out though even with much lower inventory as the massive improvement in "market time" is all about the movement of REOs. As long as the banks continue to want to move these assets, unlike they did last year, we could easily have six months of inventory on the market but have month-over-month declines much greater than one would expect with that fairly stable amount of homes available. If and when all the NODs over the past few months turn into REOs, it'll blow Thomas's number out of the water. The fence-sitters will have purchased, buyer exhaustion will kick in, and we'll get the next leg of this correction started.