Stanford admission knows about the good high schools. Stanford will make room for a 3.7 GPA ghetto graduate than a 4.0 from most Irvine high schools.
[quote author="GrewUpInIrvine" date=1211517750][quote author="CK" date=1211513180][quote author="Meatball" date=1211512779]I see 24inIrvine?s point saying that being a super star at Woodbridge High. Wouldn?t that open the door to better GPA and elite colleges rather than being a mediocre at UNI? I am not saying that better college is the whole point of high school education, but if you really care about it shouldn?t been a ?King Turd? in a mediocre school be better off in that regard? Plus being a King Turd at Woodbridge is definitely different than being one at some Santa Ana schools if she still has concerns. I hope this would add some weight in your ordeal of persuading the wife! ;-P</blockquote>
Agree 100%. She'll see the light. Besides, we are in no hurry to buy right now, anyways.
</blockquote>
Against my better judgment, I'll jump into this. I attended Woodbridge... and later Berkeley. Most of my friends who went to Woodbridge attended either UCLA, USC, or otherwise attended Berkeley. One close friend who attended Irvine High attended Stanford (which is her loss - for those of you that understand the Cal-Stanford rivalry).
The school that you attend has VERY LITTLE TO DO WITH YOUR ADMISSION TO A TOP TIER UNIVERSITY. Your GPA, your standardized testing scores, and your personality (read your "activities") control. Each of these is more a function of parental involvement than anything else.
If you are sitting there and convincing yourself that your child must attend Yale to suceed, or that attending a particular school will make or break a letter of acceptance, you are fooling yourself. Try reading a book about the admissions process.</blockquote>