AZDavidPhx_IHB
New member
irvine_home_owner -
You've given me quite a bit to respond to. I'll try to get to them all:
No, I have not lived in Irvine. I came to the blog to discuss the housing bubble. California is the epicenter so it is relevant to me although to someone who lives in Irvine, the natural reaction is going to be "Why is this jerk in AZ concerned with Irvine and telling me that my town isn't wonderful?" There is nothing about Irvine specifically that interests me, I just appreciate the open format of the main blog where the administrators don't filter and delay posts, they allow image linking, etc. IrvineRenter knows what he is talking about and it's nice to see like-minded opinions when the average word on the street is typically the opposite. The fact that it is centered around Irvine is irrelevant to me otherwise.
I am going to take issue with your accusation that the photo-shopped images are similar to the things that BK has said.
To me it is obvious that the images are clearly humorous in nature and intended to be received in jest. What makes them funny is that there is that slight element of truth.
Comedy is comedy - I love it, you love it. That's why we leave comedy at the door because the context is humorous in nature.
That is completely different than for me to look at a chart that someone submits and claim that my ethnic group or people in my culture are exempt from the results which is what bkshopr was saying. He wasn't trying to make a joke, he was just stating it matter of factly.
When you and I think of racism, we think of lunch counters, segregation, etc, but there is a lot more to it than just that. I personally hate the term "racism" because there one human race. I would rather use terms like ethnocentrism, etc, but racism appears to be the catch all word that we can all agree on even if it doesn't make sense logically.
That being said, I don't think bkshopr is the hate-monger, but he has said things that are questionable. Like I said in my previous post, when you make the statement "Asians have unpredictable wealth" you are also saying "Non-Asians have predictable wealth". This obviously has the potential to irritate a non-Asian because they can read it and conclude that they have been stereotyped as being economically inferior to Asians. This should be trivially obvious. And when I say this to bkshopr - notice how he does not even try to understand? He just starts bragging about his qualifications to say those things.
There is also the reality that we are composed of a lot of different cultures and backgrounds and I am sure that bkshopr is much more knowledgeable about Asian culture and customs than I am. That is completely different than what I am calling out in my previous example from above. I hope that you can understand the difference.
I will also respond to your accusation that I skirted racism by referring to bkshopr as "master". It took me a second to understand what you meant by this, but I concluded that you interpreted "master" as it is related to a slave-owner. I used the word "master" because I used an image of "master yoda" from Star Wars and mocked bkshopr's statements in Yoda's dialect ("Ancient chinese secret, your house prices they are", etc). My reference to "master bkshopr" was nothing more than a "master yoda" with "bkshopr" substituted for "yoda" and had nothing to do with slaves. So your argument that I skirted racism on that one isn't going to wash.
I hope that clarifies things a little better.
You've given me quite a bit to respond to. I'll try to get to them all:
No, I have not lived in Irvine. I came to the blog to discuss the housing bubble. California is the epicenter so it is relevant to me although to someone who lives in Irvine, the natural reaction is going to be "Why is this jerk in AZ concerned with Irvine and telling me that my town isn't wonderful?" There is nothing about Irvine specifically that interests me, I just appreciate the open format of the main blog where the administrators don't filter and delay posts, they allow image linking, etc. IrvineRenter knows what he is talking about and it's nice to see like-minded opinions when the average word on the street is typically the opposite. The fact that it is centered around Irvine is irrelevant to me otherwise.
I am going to take issue with your accusation that the photo-shopped images are similar to the things that BK has said.
To me it is obvious that the images are clearly humorous in nature and intended to be received in jest. What makes them funny is that there is that slight element of truth.
Comedy is comedy - I love it, you love it. That's why we leave comedy at the door because the context is humorous in nature.
That is completely different than for me to look at a chart that someone submits and claim that my ethnic group or people in my culture are exempt from the results which is what bkshopr was saying. He wasn't trying to make a joke, he was just stating it matter of factly.
When you and I think of racism, we think of lunch counters, segregation, etc, but there is a lot more to it than just that. I personally hate the term "racism" because there one human race. I would rather use terms like ethnocentrism, etc, but racism appears to be the catch all word that we can all agree on even if it doesn't make sense logically.
That being said, I don't think bkshopr is the hate-monger, but he has said things that are questionable. Like I said in my previous post, when you make the statement "Asians have unpredictable wealth" you are also saying "Non-Asians have predictable wealth". This obviously has the potential to irritate a non-Asian because they can read it and conclude that they have been stereotyped as being economically inferior to Asians. This should be trivially obvious. And when I say this to bkshopr - notice how he does not even try to understand? He just starts bragging about his qualifications to say those things.
There is also the reality that we are composed of a lot of different cultures and backgrounds and I am sure that bkshopr is much more knowledgeable about Asian culture and customs than I am. That is completely different than what I am calling out in my previous example from above. I hope that you can understand the difference.
I will also respond to your accusation that I skirted racism by referring to bkshopr as "master". It took me a second to understand what you meant by this, but I concluded that you interpreted "master" as it is related to a slave-owner. I used the word "master" because I used an image of "master yoda" from Star Wars and mocked bkshopr's statements in Yoda's dialect ("Ancient chinese secret, your house prices they are", etc). My reference to "master bkshopr" was nothing more than a "master yoda" with "bkshopr" substituted for "yoda" and had nothing to do with slaves. So your argument that I skirted racism on that one isn't going to wash.
I hope that clarifies things a little better.