The Investigation

NEW -> Contingent Buyer Assistance Program
eyephone said:
Tapes  :)

#gamechanger

Nah. We're in full Orwellian mode now. You cannot believe anything you hear, see, nor understand logically and rationally. You can only believe what the Administration tells you to believe.
 
After months of Trump repeating daily, often many times daily, and shouting, "NO COLLUSION!," he finally admits Jr. colluded, but he [Trump] didn't! Nice job father of the year. Nice job.
 
Man, if only they could've wrapped this up in a few months like Benghazi. Gowdy and Pompeo were so efficient in that investigation.
 
At least the Repubs only spend $7 million in total.  Mueller is up to $17 million and counting with little to show for the effort...wrap it up.

The select committee itself was created by House Republicans in May 2014. The committee issued its final report on the Benghazi attack a little more than two years later in June 2016 and was officially shut down in December 2016. The select panel spent $7 million during the course of the probe.

In a spending report released last month, Mueller's team disclosed that it had spent $17 million since the special counsel was appointed in May 2017.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/29/politics/benghazi-committee-special-counsel-robert-mueller/index.html
 
Forget the money. Because this is peanuts compared to Trump increasing the national debt.

More: Do you believe there was collusion?

morekaos said:
At least the Repubs only spend $7 million in total.  Mueller is up to $17 million and counting with little to show for the effort...wrap it up.

The select committee itself was created by House Republicans in May 2014. The committee issued its final report on the Benghazi attack a little more than two years later in June 2016 and was officially shut down in December 2016. The select panel spent $7 million during the course of the probe.

In a spending report released last month, Mueller's team disclosed that it had spent $17 million since the special counsel was appointed in May 2017.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/29/politics/benghazi-committee-special-counsel-robert-mueller/index.html
 
what about the actual proven collusion from the hillary camp, who paid for the russian pee pee dossier?  is that a crime?
 
Kings said:
what about the actual proven collusion from the hillary camp, who paid for the russian pee pee dossier?  is that a crime?

The dossier was first funded by Republicans. Right?
 
eyephone said:
Kings said:
what about the actual proven collusion from the hillary camp, who paid for the russian pee pee dossier?  is that a crime?

The dossier was first funded by Republicans. Right?

No, Republicans did not fund the Steele  dossier. DNC actually paid for It.

In reality, Paul Singer, the founder of the Washington Free Beacon, funded Fusion GPS for standard opposition research against Trump and a number of other presidential candidates. He stopped paying the firm in the spring of 2016, well before Steele was hired by Fusion GPS.

After that time, the DNC and Clinton campaigns started paying Fusion GPS. The firm then contracted with Christopher Steele to research and create the dossier. The prior research paid for by Singer was unrelated to and not included in the dossier.

http://dailycaller.com/2018/02/02/media-pins-steele-dossier-on-republicans/
 
?Who paid for it?
During the Republican primaries, a research firm called Fusion GPS was hired by The Washington Free Beacon, a conservative website, to unearth potentially damaging information about Mr. Trump. The Free Beacon ? which was funded by a major donor supporting Mr. Trump?s rival for the party?s nomination, Senator Marco Rubio of Florida ? told Fusion GPS to stop doing research on Mr. Trump in May 2016, as Mr. Trump was clinching the Republican nomination.?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.ny...litics/steele-dossier-trump-expained.amp.html
 
The free beacon is a private publication, their use of fusion gps predates the Steele docier. The dnc then separately funded the Steele docier after trump had secured the nomination. The separate contracts had nothing to do with each other and no information used in the free becon was used for the dnc.  The difference is a private party (becon) and a political party (dnc) wanting dirt on an individual. The dnc should be under investigation.
 
Back
Top