J
jmoney74
Guest
I personally don't understand why anaheim hills was so bad. But watever.
Perspective said:Has any FS believer ever defined what the necessary distance from a cemetery your house must be so as to not violate your principles?
jmoney74 said:Perspective said:Has any FS believer ever defined what the necessary distance from a cemetery your house must be so as to not violate your principles?
Someone told me 4 miles.. because 4 is death in Chinese? I think sometimes they make the rules as it goes.
jmoney74 said:Someone told me 4 miles.. because 4 is death in Chinese? I thinksometimesthey ALWAYS make the rules as it goes.
jmoney74 said:Perspective said:Has any FS believer ever defined what the necessary distance from a cemetery your house must be so as to not violate your principles?
Someone told me 4 miles.. because 4 is death in Chinese? I think sometimes they make the rules as it goes.
Irvinecommuter said:jmoney74 said:Perspective said:Has any FS believer ever defined what the necessary distance from a cemetery your house must be so as to not violate your principles?
Someone told me 4 miles.. because 4 is death in Chinese? I think sometimes they make the rules as it goes.
The street name next to the cemetery should be 164 for "One Road to Death"
Villager said:It's only a proposal right now, but there are talks of moving the cemetery closer to where the 5 meets the 405 as a result of a land swap deal with FivePoint. Supposedly the group fighting for the cemetery likes the newly proposed site better than the currently proposed site on Irvine Blvd, so the deal would benefit both parties involved. This seems like a good solution to the problem, and I hope the city council approves it.
http://www.ocregister.com/articles/cemetery-708565-park-land.html
Disappointing... There is absolutely no reason why they would reject the proposal.jbuttins said:Villager said:It's only a proposal right now, but there are talks of moving the cemetery closer to where the 5 meets the 405 as a result of a land swap deal with FivePoint. Supposedly the group fighting for the cemetery likes the newly proposed site better than the currently proposed site on Irvine Blvd, so the deal would benefit both parties involved. This seems like a good solution to the problem, and I hope the city council approves it.
http://www.ocregister.com/articles/cemetery-708565-park-land.html
Just an update for those who care.. it looks like the land swap proposal got rejected.
http://www.ocregister.com/articles/site-711908-park-great.html
mitirvine31 said:Is this going to effect prices in nearby communities?
jbuttins said:Just an update for those who care.. it looks like the land swap proposal got rejected.
http://www.ocregister.com/articles/site-711908-park-great.html