Proposed cemetery near Great Park and the new Irvine 5th high school

[happios]

Ironically, what you've just said is the complete opposite of what American values are
Time for you to sign up for that class you're talking about

The vets deserve to choose their final resting place, be the old site or the newly proposed swapped site. They didn't go to battle based on bad Feng Shui concerns or any other selfish reasons, they went to battle to protect you and me (all Americans).  Chinese need to know you now live in America and need to assimilate into the american culture. Our veterans deserve the best and using superstition to try to control where their final resting place should be is both ignorant & shameful.  We don't have any rights to tell the vets where they want to be buried, let them decide and if you don't like it, move. Meanwhile take a class on respect, honor, freedom and justice for all. A big heart is antidote to voodoo superstitious belives, this is the 21st century,  get with it.

 

[irvinehomeshopper]

Site swap is a win win situation for all. Happy residents and a centralized and sustainable location. It will cost much less to build and operate at the sustainable site. It is ready and even comes with a starter fund. I don't understand the logic to stay with an inferior site with all the remedial clean up and certification. To save $500,000 already spent for a money pit is a bad decision. The development cost is at least 3x-4x at the money pit in the long run vs a graded and ready site. Politicians have been bought for an illogical vote against the will of Irvine residents. At this junction superstition is irrelevant. I evaluate both sites for appropriate zoning. This is a future landmark and deserves to be at a prominent location.

 

[Perspective]

Site swap is a win win situation for all. Happy residents and a centralized and sustainable location. It will cost much less to build and operate at the sustainable site. It is ready and even comes with a starter fund. I don't understand the logic to stay with an inferior site with all the remedial clean up and certification. To save $500,000 already spent for a money pit is a bad decision. The development cost is at least 3x-4x at the money pit in the long run vs a graded and ready site. Politicians have been bought for an illogical vote against the will of Irvine residents. At this junction superstition is irrelevant. I evaluate both sites for appropriate zoning. This is a future landmark and deserves to be at a prominent location.

How would politicians have been bought? Who would pay them to keep the cemetery in the Great Park and why?

Superstition is relevant to the neighbors of the proposed/alternative site, no? NIMBYism exists everywhere, not just Great Park adjacent neighbors.