SoclosetoIrvine said:
Have you seen that minivan picture with the parents high and toddler in the backseat?
Source:http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...cture-parents-ohio-police-child-a7235621.html
Presidential Elections
- Thread starter eyephone
- Start date
NEW -> Contingent Buyer Assistance Program
Have you seen that minivan picture with the parents high and toddler in the backseat?
Source:http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...cture-parents-ohio-police-child-a7235621.html
Take Hillary Clinton... While she's the wife of a former president, she has worked on her resume to become a viable candidate. She's worked in executive roles, legislative roles and legal roles. She certainly has the experience to qualify her without the novelty of being Bill's wife. Being Bill Clinton's wife gives her an edge, however. I would actually support her if she wasn't so dishonest with the identity politics. I would support her if she didn't cater to identities (vote for me because you are black. vote for me because you are a woman...) I would support her if she wasn't so dishonest about her mistakes and her own actions. I'd support her if I agreed more with her platform, and I agree with some of it... That said, I think she has the experience. What has Michelle Obama done to get an endorsement for POTUS?
If you don't like either candidate, I suggest voting for a 3rd party to help send a message. I bet that Hillary will win California by a landslide. California is an all or none state, so basically votes for Trump don't matter here.
Whoa, that was an aggressive retort. I think it was just a political observation that she'd probably do very well in a Presidential election - i.e. substitute Michelle Obama for Hillary Clinton and maybe this election is an Electoral College landslide for the Democrats?
She's a Princeton undergrad and Harvard Law grad. There's that. (I know the Talk Irvine crowd LOVES them some prestige!)
Not offended at all. Just thought the tone of the response was disproportionate to the initial thought/comment.
IMO, Pence won, but not sure if that matters at all. Kaine was pretty annoying and awful. It's like he came to battle Trump and not Pence. Kaine couldn't go more than a couple of seconds without interrupting Pence. Kaine did use a lot of short sighted talking points, though, which does win votes from the ignorant.
For perspective, I thought Hillary won the first debate.
CNN Resultshttp://www.cnn.com/2016/10/05/politics/mike-pence-tim-kaine-vp-debate-poll/index.html
What's difficult to forget, is Kaine continuously rudely interrupting Pence. That's the main takeaway. However, it was inexplicable why Pence blatantly lied about what Trump has said, on many occasions. Statements Pence made in this debate will follow any Presidential aspirations he has.
This is a classic Trump comment - insulting while assuming facts, and even if accepted as true, irrelevant in the big picture. Do you know she was an affirmative action admit? Even if true, it's not like her qualifications would've been anything more than slightly different than non-affirmative action admittees.
Aren't a third of Ivy admits legacy related? Do we "count" them?
Yes, if you want an extreme social conservative in the Oval Office.
Boo... I want a financial conservative. I don't mind socially liberal as long as they are not about using government funding to create a welfare state.
Speaking of the "welfare state," I heard a good line yesterday - "The same Republicans who are applauding Trump's 'genius' use of the tax code to benefit from the tax system financially, decry poor folk for their use of the 'welfare' system to benefit financially."
RWW News: Mike Pence Criticizes Theory Of Evolutionhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ikax0Y0NJsY
Have you seen that minivan picture with the parents high and toddler in the backseat?
Source:http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...cture-parents-ohio-police-child-a7235621.html
How much do you know about Michelle Obama to think she might be a decent choice in the future? Is it simply because she is the wife of the current president and she can pick his brain? I mean, of all the women in America, why choose her? Is there none more qualified? Serious question. I am curious how people think.SoclosetoIrvine said:So Whose voting what?
I'm probably going to sit this election out. I don't like either candidate. One should be in jail and the other might start a world war. I would love a woman president but not her (michelle Obama might be a decent choice in the future) and I would love a non politician (but not him)...i'll just close my eyes and pray >
Take Hillary Clinton... While she's the wife of a former president, she has worked on her resume to become a viable candidate. She's worked in executive roles, legislative roles and legal roles. She certainly has the experience to qualify her without the novelty of being Bill's wife. Being Bill Clinton's wife gives her an edge, however. I would actually support her if she wasn't so dishonest with the identity politics. I would support her if she didn't cater to identities (vote for me because you are black. vote for me because you are a woman...) I would support her if she wasn't so dishonest about her mistakes and her own actions. I'd support her if I agreed more with her platform, and I agree with some of it... That said, I think she has the experience. What has Michelle Obama done to get an endorsement for POTUS?
If you don't like either candidate, I suggest voting for a 3rd party to help send a message. I bet that Hillary will win California by a landslide. California is an all or none state, so basically votes for Trump don't matter here.
I'm all for decriminalizing marijuana but I don't know if we're ready for all the issues that come with this.
How do we regulate homegrowers so they don't blow up their neighborhoods?
Is there a provision to prohibit smoking in spaces that tobacco smoke is prohibited? And what legal protections do you have if your neighbor's smoke drifts into your house?
Is there a way to quantitatively measure if someone is too high to drive?
FYI haven't read the whole prop. Maybe some of things are covered...
How do we regulate homegrowers so they don't blow up their neighborhoods?
Is there a provision to prohibit smoking in spaces that tobacco smoke is prohibited? And what legal protections do you have if your neighbor's smoke drifts into your house?
Is there a way to quantitatively measure if someone is too high to drive?
FYI haven't read the whole prop. Maybe some of things are covered...
Perspective
Well-known member
spootieho said:How much do you know about Michelle Obama to think she might be a decent choice in the future? Is it simply because she is the wife of the current president and she can pick his brain? I mean, of all the women in America, why choose her? Is there none more qualified? Serious question. I am curious how people think.SoclosetoIrvine said:So Whose voting what?
I'm probably going to sit this election out. I don't like either candidate. One should be in jail and the other might start a world war. I would love a woman president but not her (michelle Obama might be a decent choice in the future) and I would love a non politician (but not him)...i'll just close my eyes and pray >
Take Hillary Clinton... While she's the wife of a former president, she has worked on her resume to become a viable candidate. She's worked in executive roles, legislative roles and legal roles. She certainly has the experience to qualify her without the novelty of being Bill's wife. Being Bill Clinton's wife gives her an edge, however. I would actually support her if she wasn't so dishonest with the identity politics. I would support her if she didn't cater to identities (vote for me because you are black. vote for me because you are a woman...) I would support her if she wasn't so dishonest about her mistakes and her own actions. I'd support her if I agreed more with her platform, and I agree with some of it... That said, I think she has the experience. What has Michelle Obama done to get an endorsement for POTUS?
If you don't like either candidate, I suggest voting for a 3rd party to help send a message. I bet that Hillary will win California by a landslide. California is an all or none state, so basically votes for Trump don't matter here.
Whoa, that was an aggressive retort. I think it was just a political observation that she'd probably do very well in a Presidential election - i.e. substitute Michelle Obama for Hillary Clinton and maybe this election is an Electoral College landslide for the Democrats?
She's a Princeton undergrad and Harvard Law grad. There's that. (I know the Talk Irvine crowd LOVES them some prestige!)
Perspective
Well-known member
spootieho said:
Not offended at all. Just thought the tone of the response was disproportionate to the initial thought/comment.
eyephone said:
IMO, Pence won, but not sure if that matters at all. Kaine was pretty annoying and awful. It's like he came to battle Trump and not Pence. Kaine couldn't go more than a couple of seconds without interrupting Pence. Kaine did use a lot of short sighted talking points, though, which does win votes from the ignorant.
For perspective, I thought Hillary won the first debate.
CNN Resultshttp://www.cnn.com/2016/10/05/politics/mike-pence-tim-kaine-vp-debate-poll/index.html
Perspective
Well-known member
spootieho said:
What's difficult to forget, is Kaine continuously rudely interrupting Pence. That's the main takeaway. However, it was inexplicable why Pence blatantly lied about what Trump has said, on many occasions. Statements Pence made in this debate will follow any Presidential aspirations he has.
Perspective
Well-known member
WTTCHMN said:
This is a classic Trump comment - insulting while assuming facts, and even if accepted as true, irrelevant in the big picture. Do you know she was an affirmative action admit? Even if true, it's not like her qualifications would've been anything more than slightly different than non-affirmative action admittees.
Aren't a third of Ivy admits legacy related? Do we "count" them?
irvinehomeowner
Well-known member
So can we vote for Pence instead of Trump or Hillary?
Or maybe we vote Trump, impeach him because you know he'll do something stupid and then we have Pence for prez?
Or maybe we vote Trump, impeach him because you know he'll do something stupid and then we have Pence for prez?
Perspective
Well-known member
irvinehomeowner said:
Yes, if you want an extreme social conservative in the Oval Office.
irvinehomeowner
Well-known member
Perspective said:
Boo... I want a financial conservative. I don't mind socially liberal as long as they are not about using government funding to create a welfare state.
Perspective
Well-known member
irvinehomeowner said:
Speaking of the "welfare state," I heard a good line yesterday - "The same Republicans who are applauding Trump's 'genius' use of the tax code to benefit from the tax system financially, decry poor folk for their use of the 'welfare' system to benefit financially."
SoclosetoIrvine
New member
Pence won the debate I feel as well...He was calm and kaine came off like a little kid.
Off topic: Is CNN pro Hilary or democrat?
Whenever Pence brought up the Hillary emails, the moderator was fighting to cut him off even though it was on topic of the question asked
video on this site if you missed it:http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiep...r-debate-moderator-pleads-to-move-on-n2228176
Off topic: Is CNN pro Hilary or democrat?
Whenever Pence brought up the Hillary emails, the moderator was fighting to cut him off even though it was on topic of the question asked
video on this site if you missed it:http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiep...r-debate-moderator-pleads-to-move-on-n2228176
Perspective
Well-known member
irvinehomeowner said:
RWW News: Mike Pence Criticizes Theory Of Evolutionhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ikax0Y0NJsY
