President Trump

NEW -> Contingent Buyer Assistance Program
morekaos said:
All the hyperbolic talk, all the kicking and screaming, all the "huge "protests and outpouring of support will be for naught. Go ahead, don't like this Supreme Court candidate? Tough luck he will be approved.  Don't like DeVoss or this particular Secretary of State?  Tough toenails they will be approved. Don't like a pipeline. Scream your lungs out snowflakes...it will be built.  This is all theater. As our previous President loved to point out, "elections have consequences." Suck it up and live with them...we had to for the last 8 years.  Now we get to drive. Like him or hate him he is and will deliver on his promises. Protest away, nothing will change.
Click to expand...

Check, check, check and check.  OK batting 1000.
 
Not only that but those sad Antifa protesters got beat up in Huntington Beach last week.  It's all over for the left.
 
My view of Trump's foreign policy is "peace through strength" not necessarily non-interventionism like Rand Paul.  If Trump decides to pursue regime change and topple Assad then I will be disappointed.  There is still restraint being shown here.  As a contrast, Hillary has now come out advocating for the destruction of the entire Syrian airforce, which would have a much higher probability of leading to WWIII with Russia.  John McCain is also beating the war drum and talking like this is the first salvo in an all out war against Syria.  I really don't see Trump caving to those type of voices, particularly because he is sensitive to the criticism from the people like you and others that are disappointed by this.
 
What do you guys think about Trump's first 100 days?  I like him a lot better than I thought I would because he's just like a continuation of Obama and I stopped listening to him since he changes his mind every other hour. All in all, I give him pretty high marks, just as long as he doesn't provoke the smat cookie on the other side of the Pacific.
 
Today I heard Trump lost nterest in moving the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem immediately after the inauguration and that he is extending Obama's "worst ever" Iran deal. What other promises has he broken?  I can't keep track.
 
The sole reason for voting for our Rabid Orangutan was to get a solid replacement for Scalia and packing empty judge seats with conservatives. So far, so good.

There's also plenty to be unhappy with - Jerusalem (as noted above) and stalling on so many other issues like genuine healthcare reform, etc. Lots of heavy lifting ahead. Once this fake impeachment hoo-ha moves off the front page, we may see some real work done.

Time will tell.

My .02c

Soylent Green Is People
Head Chef, The Soylent Corporation
 
morekaos said:
Panda...have been places you were not supposed to be again?  Bad Panda!!

Accused hacker Kim Dotcom says he will testify that murdered DNC staffer Seth Rich passed documents to Wikileaks under the internet moniker 'Panda' - IF the Justice Department cuts him a deal

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4563700/Kim-Dotcom-wants-deal-DOJ-Seth-Rich-testimony.html#ixzz4isL8yQak
Click to expand...

Was this the one that Hannity was preaching on saying it was a conspiracy?  Saying that Set was murdered because of the leaks rather than a botched robbery?
 
jmoney74 said:
Was this the one that Hannity was preaching on saying it was a conspiracy?  Saying that Set was murdered because of the leaks rather than a botched robbery?
Click to expand...
I saw something where he was questioning it.

Anyhow, there's two rumors.
1. Seth Rich leaked the documents
2. Seth Rich was murdered for leaking documents

He may or may not have leaked documents.  His death may or may not be because of a botched robbery.  He may or may not have been assassinated.  The cause of death doesn't disprove the leaks. 

Without any proof, however, all this is pure speculation.  It's certainly something to investigate if there's any evidence to give the claims any credibility.  Without proof, though, it's pretty insensitive to his family to drag him through this.

Is there any evidence that's been put out there to suggest he was involved with the leaks?
 
spootieho said:
jmoney74 said:
Was this the one that Hannity was preaching on saying it was a conspiracy?  Saying that Set was murdered because of the leaks rather than a botched robbery?
Click to expand...
I saw something where he was questioning it.

Anyhow, there's two rumors.
1. Seth Rich leaked the documents
2. Seth Rich was murdered for leaking documents

He may or may not have leaked documents.  His death may or may not be because of a botched robbery.  He may or may not have been assassinated.  The cause of death doesn't disprove the leaks. 

Without any proof, however, all this is pure speculation.  It's certainly something to investigate if there's any evidence to give the claims any credibility.  Without proof, though, it's pretty insensitive to his family to drag him through this.

Is there any evidence that's been put out there to suggest he was involved with the leaks?
Click to expand...

None whatsoever

But indeed raises eyebrows just thinking about it. Although no evidence.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top