Midterm Elections

NEW -> Contingent Buyer Assistance Program
eyephone said:
morekaos said:
eyephone said:
Trump Administration replacing high fuel standards is good for consumers.

(This is too funny.)

This is what happens when the government mandates impossible terms on a sector...when it can't be achieved..they cheat.

volkswagen emissions scandal

https://www.npr.org/tags/443453659/volkswagen-emissions-scandal

They cheated the government and the consumers. There?s no excuse for cheating.

So if you don?t like the high fuel standard. You should sell your car. Then get an old junker with bad mileage.

Sick Burn ...  :)
 
Not a burn at all. I really do drive and 1985 Ford Bronco.  I can and have afforded nicer cars but I chose the simplicity and heft of a real truck.
 
morekaos said:
My point is, set the standards at attainable levels and there will be no cheating.  All these auto companies made a calculus that in order to sell any cars they had to find a way around the standards. Cmon , did you ever believe there really was a clean burning Diesel engine? That?s a fantasy. I drive a 1985 Ford Bronco.

No one pushed them to put high mileage for their cars. They could of just went by the actual mpg. But they had the incentive to put high mpg for sales.

Blaming the government for Volkswagon fuel scandal is a stretch.
 
eyephone said:
morekaos said:
My point is, set the standards at attainable levels and there will be no cheating.  All these auto companies made a calculus that in order to sell any cars they had to find a way around the standards. Cmon , did you ever believe there really was a clean burning Diesel engine? That?s a fantasy. I drive a 1985 Ford Bronco.

No one pushed them to put high mileage for their cars. They could the actual mpg. But they had the incentive to put high mpg for sales.

Blaming the government for Volkswagon fuel scandal is a stretch.

The government has no business in trying to clean the air we breathe, nor in increasing energy efficiency and lessening our dependence on fossil fuels! Get off my lawn!

USA! USA! USA!
 
Perspective: Good point, who doesn?t want clean air?

The world saw the effect of pollution with China. Thick smoke of pollution etc..

You know the masks pics that Belly previously posted and other TI members in other threads. It?s because of the pollution.

Now there are efforts to curb the pollution.
 
Why do you have to always take it to the extreme? No one said the government has NO place at the table.  Just be reasonable with your goals.  Emission goals set in stone for the diesel engine market were pure fantasy.  The technology just was not there so in order to sell any vehicles they found a creative way around the standards.  It was more of a business calculation.  Not endorsing it but also not surprised by it either.  Should there be some standards?, sure, but lets keep them reasonable and attainable. We can strike a balance.
 
My post was clearly satire, and proves a point. I'd be willing to bet 70% of Trump's base would support those arguments though. That same percentage thinks Obama's a Kenyan-born Muslim.
 
morekaos said:
eyephone said:
Trump Administration replacing high fuel standards is good for consumers.

(This is too funny.)

This is what happens when the government mandates impossible terms on a sector...when it can't be achieved..they cheat.

volkswagen emissions scandal

https://www.npr.org/tags/443453659/volkswagen-emissions-scandal


VW's chairman blamed the emissions scandal on a group of engineers who decided to cheat on the emissions test, because they couldn't find a timely and cost effective solution.  The EPA had cut the nitrogen oxide emission cap from 1.15 gram per mile to 0.076 grams per mile in 2005.

Competitors from Japan and Korea went back to the drawing board to redesign their diesel engines.  For example Mazda's CX-5 diesel,  Hyundai's 2.2 liter CRDi turbo-diesel for the Santa Fe, Honda's i-DTEC and i-CTDi diesel engines.

But not VW.  With competitors out of the way for few years they decided to install cheat software from Robert Bosch GmbH, and cash in by selling 11 million new model diesel cars under VW, Audi, and Skoda brands.

Was it just a small group of engineers and managers who decided to cheat and look the other way?  Or were they made the fall guy?  I have no idea.  But it certainly isn't impossible to meet the new emission standards, if they were willing to take the time and go back to the drawing board like their competitors did.
 
it's all a facade anyway

Revealed: nearly all new diesel cars exceed official pollution limits

Health experts lambast ?deceitful? carmakers as data suggests 97% of vehicles fail to meet NOx emissions standards in real-world conditions

Ninety-seven percent of all modern diesel cars emit more toxic nitrogen oxide (NOx) pollution on the road than the official limit, according to the most comprehensive set of data yet published, with a quarter producing at least six times more than the limit.

Surprisingly, the tiny number of models that did not exceed the standard were mostly Volkswagens, the carmaker whose cheating of diesel emissions tests which emerged last year sparked the scandal. Experts said the new results show that clean diesel cars can be made but that virtually all manufacturers have failed to do so.

The new data, from testing industry leader Emissions Analytics (EA), follows the publication this week by the Department for Transport of emissions results for 37 vehicles, all of which emitted more NOx on the road than the official limit. But the new data covers more than 250 vehicles in more stringently standardised road conditions. EA found that just one of 201 Euro 5 diesels, the EU standard from 2009, did not exceed the limit, while only seven of 62 Euro 6 diesels, the stricter standard since 2014, did so.

Diesel cars must meet an official EU limit for NOx but are only tested in a laboratory under fixed conditions. All vehicles sold pass this regulation but, when taken out on to real roads, almost all emit far more pollution. There is no suggestion that any of the cars tested broke the law on emissions limits or used any cheat devices.
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/apr/23/diesel-cars-pollution-limits-nox-emissions[/quote]
 
fortune11 said:
Honest question . But don?t bother answering as you know the answer yourselves .

Safely cocooned in liberal SoCal, You wouldn?t let these deplorables near you or your families but they are all good when used as a means to an end (tax cuts , owning the libs , etc)

The ugly truth
 
fortune11 said:
Re: Midterm Elections
I still haven?t seen anyone refute the actual point ? lot of both sideisms , but ....

Are there any crazy , rabid rallies on the left where democratic politicians are encouraging violence ? 

ANother question ? what would happen to the ROI of a neighborhood if people like these below were to move in ?

Honest question . But don?t bother answering as you know the answer yourselves .

Safely cocooned in liberal SoCal, You wouldn?t let these deplorables near you or your families but they are all good when used as a means to an end (tax cuts , owning the libs , etc)
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...rters-cnn-jim-acosta-tampa-maga-a8472436.html

But what about what's happening outside of liberal California? Populism is sweeping across the western world. Trump is part of a worldwide phenomenon. Alternative for Germany (AfD). The League of Italy. Brexit. The establishment is under assault all over the Western world. The Deplorables are on the march all over the world!

And the with advent of the internet, like minded Deplorables in different countries can easily connect with each other, cooperate and share strategies, and influence each other's politics.
 
Happiness said:
fortune11 said:
Re: Midterm Elections
I still haven?t seen anyone refute the actual point ? lot of both sideisms , but ....

Are there any crazy , rabid rallies on the left where democratic politicians are encouraging violence ? 

ANother question ? what would happen to the ROI of a neighborhood if people like these below were to move in ?

Honest question . But don?t bother answering as you know the answer yourselves .

Safely cocooned in liberal SoCal, You wouldn?t let these deplorables near you or your families but they are all good when used as a means to an end (tax cuts , owning the libs , etc)
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...rters-cnn-jim-acosta-tampa-maga-a8472436.html

But what about what's happening outside of liberal California? Populism is sweeping across the western world. Trump is part of a worldwide phenomenon. Alternative for Germany (AfD). The League of Italy. Brexit. The establishment is under assault all over the Western world. The Deplorables are on the march all over the world!

And the with advent of the internet, like minded Deplorables in different countries can easily connect with each other, cooperate and share strategies, and influence each other's politics.

Racism and anti-immigrant sentiment has worked for centuries, and still does, very well.
 
I don't follow anyone in the Freedom Caucus. Is anyone complaining about this? Where's the outrage? I thought increased growth would allow tax cuts to pay for themselves? When? Soon?

Debt-laden US government is expanding the size of Treasury bond auctions to fund itself

All that debt piling up in the government's coffers is going to require the Treasury Department to get more creative in figuring out how to finance it.

As a result, the department said Wednesday it needs to sell an additional $30 billion worth of bonds in the second quarter and is adding a two-month note to the offering of debt securities. That compares to a $27 billion increase for the first quarter.

In its quarterly refunding statement, the Treasury said it will be adding another $1 billion a month to each of the auctions for two-, three- and five-year notes over the next three months. On top of that, it will increase the auction size for the seven- and 10-year notes and the 30-year bond by $1 billion for the August sales.

The moves come as the government is looking for the best ways to handle a budget deficit expected to eclipse $1 trillion in the next two years. The national debt is at $21.3 trillion, having risen about $800 billion in 2018. ...
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/08/01/deb...panding-the-size-of-treasury-bond-auctio.html
 
Perspective said:
Happiness said:
fortune11 said:
Re: Midterm Elections
I still haven?t seen anyone refute the actual point ? lot of both sideisms , but ....

Are there any crazy , rabid rallies on the left where democratic politicians are encouraging violence ? 

ANother question ? what would happen to the ROI of a neighborhood if people like these below were to move in ?

Honest question . But don?t bother answering as you know the answer yourselves .

Safely cocooned in liberal SoCal, You wouldn?t let these deplorables near you or your families but they are all good when used as a means to an end (tax cuts , owning the libs , etc)
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...rters-cnn-jim-acosta-tampa-maga-a8472436.html

But what about what's happening outside of liberal California? Populism is sweeping across the western world. Trump is part of a worldwide phenomenon. Alternative for Germany (AfD). The League of Italy. Brexit. The establishment is under assault all over the Western world. The Deplorables are on the march all over the world!

And the with advent of the internet, like minded Deplorables in different countries can easily connect with each other, cooperate and share strategies, and influence each other's politics.

Racism and anti-immigrant sentiment has worked for centuries, and still does, very well.

Assuming for the sake of argument that it is "racist" to demand limits on the admission of migrants. Is it ok for the state to ignore the concerns of the majoritiy of its citizens on the basis that those concerns are "racist?" What is more important, democracy or no racism?
 
Happiness said:
Perspective said:
Happiness said:
fortune11 said:
Re: Midterm Elections
I still haven?t seen anyone refute the actual point ? lot of both sideisms , but ....

Are there any crazy , rabid rallies on the left where democratic politicians are encouraging violence ? 

ANother question ? what would happen to the ROI of a neighborhood if people like these below were to move in ?

Honest question . But don?t bother answering as you know the answer yourselves .

Safely cocooned in liberal SoCal, You wouldn?t let these deplorables near you or your families but they are all good when used as a means to an end (tax cuts , owning the libs , etc)
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...rters-cnn-jim-acosta-tampa-maga-a8472436.html

But what about what's happening outside of liberal California? Populism is sweeping across the western world. Trump is part of a worldwide phenomenon. Alternative for Germany (AfD). The League of Italy. Brexit. The establishment is under assault all over the Western world. The Deplorables are on the march all over the world!

And the with advent of the internet, like minded Deplorables in different countries can easily connect with each other, cooperate and share strategies, and influence each other's politics.

Racism and anti-immigrant sentiment has worked for centuries, and still does, very well.

Assuming for the sake of argument that it is "racist" to demand limits on the admission of migrants. Is it ok for the state to ignore the concerns of the majoritiy of its citizens on the basis that those concerns are "racist?" What is more important, democracy or no racism?

Fair questions. We (the US) should identify how many legal migrants we want, and the percentage of skill level within this group we desire. We should patrol our borders and prevent illegal immigration. We should criminally punish employers for employing illegal immigrants.

We can do all of this without the racist comments Trump makes routinely on this subject and many others. His purpose is to excite his base. It works.

Being racist and making racist comments isn't illegal. Trump and his enthusiasts, apologists, and enablers just need to own it.

Democrats are often their worst enemy. Defending illegal immigrants daily, especially sanctuary cities, is a losing political argument. Support the Dreamers and denounce family separation, but beyond that, they should just be pushing for a reasonable immigration bill.

Don't forget when arguing "the majority of citizens," that ~3 million more folks voted for Clinton, than Trump. The Electoral College, a vestige of slavery, gave us Trump.
 
Perspective said:
Happiness said:
Perspective said:
Happiness said:
fortune11 said:
Re: Midterm Elections
I still haven?t seen anyone refute the actual point ? lot of both sideisms , but ....

Are there any crazy , rabid rallies on the left where democratic politicians are encouraging violence ? 

ANother question ? what would happen to the ROI of a neighborhood if people like these below were to move in ?

Honest question . But don?t bother answering as you know the answer yourselves .

Safely cocooned in liberal SoCal, You wouldn?t let these deplorables near you or your families but they are all good when used as a means to an end (tax cuts , owning the libs , etc)
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...rters-cnn-jim-acosta-tampa-maga-a8472436.html

But what about what's happening outside of liberal California? Populism is sweeping across the western world. Trump is part of a worldwide phenomenon. Alternative for Germany (AfD). The League of Italy. Brexit. The establishment is under assault all over the Western world. The Deplorables are on the march all over the world!

And the with advent of the internet, like minded Deplorables in different countries can easily connect with each other, cooperate and share strategies, and influence each other's politics.

Racism and anti-immigrant sentiment has worked for centuries, and still does, very well.

Assuming for the sake of argument that it is "racist" to demand limits on the admission of migrants. Is it ok for the state to ignore the concerns of the majoritiy of its citizens on the basis that those concerns are "racist?" What is more important, democracy or no racism?

Fair questions. We (the US) should identify how many legal migrants we want, and the percentage of skill level within this group we desire. We should patrol our borders and prevent illegal immigration. We should criminally punish employers for employing illegal immigrants.

We can do all of this without the racist comments Trump makes routinely on this subject and many others. His purpose is to excite his base. It works.

Being racist and making racist comments isn't illegal. Trump and his enthusiasts, apologists, and enablers just need to own it.

Democrats are often their worst enemy. Defending illegal immigrants daily, especially sanctuary cities, is a losing political argument. Support the Dreamers and denounce family separation, but beyond that, they should just be pushing for a reasonable immigration bill.

Don't forget when arguing "the majority of citizens," that ~3 million more folks voted for Clinton, than Trump. The Electoral College, a vestige of slavery, gave us Trump.

My comment about the disconnect between the majority of citizens and their government regarding migrants refers to European countries like UK, Spain, Italy. I don't think most Americans even have an opinion about migrants and refugees since we allow so few of them, even before Trump.
 
For the 100th time ,

US is not like Europe

We don?t let in 1mm refugees from one country within a few years like Germany did and Merkel paid the prIce

Legal immigration is extremely difficult process w heavy vetting - even for asylum seekers

Trump and his deplorables are trying to create an issue where there is none

And you wonder why ? Here is why ? Trump is the embodiment of the culture-wars-for-the-poor, tax-cuts-for-the-rich approach to politics.
 
Perspective said:
Soylent Green Is People said:
I prefer Twitter as my primary Social Media outlet. I try to maintain a 50/50 follower split between the two sides, but that's tougher to do nowadays.

Those on the "hard right" - AKA "Crazies" often re-tweet links right leaning news links from InfoWars, Breitbart, True Pundit, Daily Wire, Fox, various English news sites, Cernovich, and Drudge.

Those on the "hard left" - AKA "Crazies" often re-tweet left leaning news links from MSNBC, Daily KOS, Slate, The Intercept, Huffington Post, NPR, Salon, and the New York Times.

In either a right or left wing news case, unless the data is "original reporting" most sites are simply aggregators of articles with accompanied commentary on the article.

If you refuse to listen to both sides, you're really missing out. You may not agree with what's being said, but at least you have a wider perspective on issues. I'm not saying that everyone needs to read The Daily Stormer, but treating Fox or MSNBC as equal to a Nazi agitprop rag is lazy thinking.

My .02c

Measure the level of absurdity of those hard left and hard right sources. On a scale of 1-10, 1 being informed educated news and opinions from a certain political perspective, and 10 being complete nonsense with no basis in reality.

Hannity and Lou Dobbs are close to 10s, while Huffington Post is closer to 1.

For the record, I read The Economist.

Good choice of publication

BTW I couldn?t help but laugh when I saw ?both - sideism ? compapring New York Times with Drudge Report : )

Another practical test to cut through all this BS ? if you have high school kids undergoing college counseling , what publication are they recommend to read ? Drudge ? Or NYT ?  yes , you have your answer. 

Or better still , give me one example of in depth reporting backed by evidence and research published by any of these right wing nutjob sites ? you know , Just one ...
 
Back
Top