How much does the Irvine Company hate this site?
- Thread starter 4walls4me_IHB
- Start date
NEW -> Contingent Buyer Assistance Program
profette_IHB
New member
I EvaL!
momopi_IHB
New member
EvaLSeraphim_IHB
New member
<p><em>Acpme: who is this eval seraapin person?</em></p>
<p><em>Momopi: A 5th (mid) ranking Angel/Celestial being?
</em></p>
<p>Oh Momo, if only that were true. Actually, I made a typo when creating my screen name. I was supposed to be Eva L Terrapin.</p>
<p><img alt="" src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/46/144530421_4d24a312c3.jpg?v=0" /></p>
<p><em>Momopi: A 5th (mid) ranking Angel/Celestial being?
</em></p>
<p>Oh Momo, if only that were true. Actually, I made a typo when creating my screen name. I was supposed to be Eva L Terrapin.</p>
<p><img alt="" src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/46/144530421_4d24a312c3.jpg?v=0" /></p>
EvaLSeraphim_IHB
New member
<p><em>Eva, one case does not mean much.</em> </p>
<p>Perhaps my reading comprehension isn't the best, but that isn't how I read <em>Auto Equity Sales </em>(assuming you are working in CA state courts)<em>. </em>And given that your first motions would be in the trial court, well . . . it seems to me that the trial court would be bound by <em>Krinsky</em>.</p>
<p><em>I've been involved in this a few times and we've successfully done it every time, including within the last 6 months, in California. We even identified a guy posting from overseas.</em></p>
<p>That may very well be true, but your statement doesn't preclude mine from being accurate either. Please note that <em>Krinsky</em> was issued on February 6, 2008 (it's in the upper left hand corner of the first page if you didn't catch it earlier). The docket does not show that a petition for review has been filed.</p>
<p>Perhaps my reading comprehension isn't the best, but that isn't how I read <em>Auto Equity Sales </em>(assuming you are working in CA state courts)<em>. </em>And given that your first motions would be in the trial court, well . . . it seems to me that the trial court would be bound by <em>Krinsky</em>.</p>
<p><em>I've been involved in this a few times and we've successfully done it every time, including within the last 6 months, in California. We even identified a guy posting from overseas.</em></p>
<p>That may very well be true, but your statement doesn't preclude mine from being accurate either. Please note that <em>Krinsky</em> was issued on February 6, 2008 (it's in the upper left hand corner of the first page if you didn't catch it earlier). The docket does not show that a petition for review has been filed.</p>
jcaraway_IHB
New member
It's true if you consider $25K in legal fees and a 50/50 chance in determining the actual identity not difficult.
IrvineRenter_IHB
New member
The ironic part would be that I will likely end up revealing myself once I publish the book...
SoCalGal_IHB
New member
What book, IR?
CalGal_IHB
New member
<p>IR, don't forget about us little people when you are on the Best Seller List. </p>
IrvineRenter_IHB
New member
<em>"What book, IR?"</em>
The manuscript I am writing 90% complete. It started as a compilation of my posts from last year, but it has evolved into a comprehensive look at the causes and implications of the housing bubble. Much of it has been in posts on the main blog. I haven't said too much about it because I didn't want to blather on about something I may not actually write or publish, but I am getting very close to completion right now, so I don't mind talking more about it.
The manuscript I am writing 90% complete. It started as a compilation of my posts from last year, but it has evolved into a comprehensive look at the causes and implications of the housing bubble. Much of it has been in posts on the main blog. I haven't said too much about it because I didn't want to blather on about something I may not actually write or publish, but I am getting very close to completion right now, so I don't mind talking more about it.
irvinesinglemom_IHB
New member
IR - don't forget us little people when you're rich and famous on the talk show circuit
Rocker_IHB
New member
<p>skek,</p>
<p>If I'm a blogger and want to remain anonymous, so I go to a Panera bread and I use their free WiFi service, or any other free WiFi hotspot for that matter, whenever I want to post something, or send email or even browse web pages, How can you trace me?
Assuming that I'll be very disciplined while doing that and never use my work office or home Internet connection, because that can easily identify me, also I'll rotate places randomly.
Will this be a good way to anonymize myself?
I think there are ways to hide in the Internet, and is not that easy to catch a person that knows what's going in the background.</p>
<p>If I'm a blogger and want to remain anonymous, so I go to a Panera bread and I use their free WiFi service, or any other free WiFi hotspot for that matter, whenever I want to post something, or send email or even browse web pages, How can you trace me?
Assuming that I'll be very disciplined while doing that and never use my work office or home Internet connection, because that can easily identify me, also I'll rotate places randomly.
Will this be a good way to anonymize myself?
I think there are ways to hide in the Internet, and is not that easy to catch a person that knows what's going in the background.</p>
reason_IHB
New member
<p>I am no expert. But I would assume no matter where you're at, your "sign on" will always be the same. In other words, each person on the internet when you sign up with your service provider. You can make up any screen names but attached to that is always your real name, address, etc. </p>
<p>So while it's true you're not home by using a public wi-fi. Hence, you can't be traced to your home. But when you're online even if it's on wi-fi, your "sign on" identifies the real you.</p>
<p>So while it's true you're not home by using a public wi-fi. Hence, you can't be traced to your home. But when you're online even if it's on wi-fi, your "sign on" identifies the real you.</p>
reason_IHB
New member
Sort of like. I can drive around town and you don't know where I live. But on me, my driver's license, will disclose my identity.
biscuitninja_IHB
New member
<p>Wow, I leave this thread and it explodes...</p>
<p>Yes there are relatively easy ways to track you and everything you have ever done. With enough ingenuity its relatively simple. Legal? Well that's a question for another time. </p>
<p>-bix</p>
<p>Yes there are relatively easy ways to track you and everything you have ever done. With enough ingenuity its relatively simple. Legal? Well that's a question for another time. </p>
<p>-bix</p>
Gohabsgo_IHB
New member
"The manuscript I am writing 90% complete"
I knew it! It was my guess in the first year resolution. You'll have to sign me a copy...I'll tell you my real name! Can't wait to see the front page.
I knew it! It was my guess in the first year resolution. You'll have to sign me a copy...I'll tell you my real name! Can't wait to see the front page.
Trooper_IHB
New member
<p>The only way I've been able to determine who someone is on the internet, is with a search warrant, signed by a judge. This search warrant only comes about because a <em>crime</em> report was filed and a D.A. or C.A. agreed that there was sufficient evidence to prosecute successfully.</p>
<p> If there was an easier and <em>legal </em>way to do it, I'd know about it.(and if I'm wrong here, I'd love to know about it because it would make my investigations that much easier...so do tell....whisper if you have to) I suspect if the Irvine Company did indeed track us down by using some less legal technique, there is no way they could use the information as it would have been obtained illegally. (don't think they want that one hanging over them). If they tried it, I imagine we'd own them.</p>
<p>skek....you sound like a shill for IAC trying to scare people away from posting.</p>
<p>Read this people: <a href="http://ask-leo.com/how_do_i_find_out_whos_at_a_particular_ip_address.html">http://ask-leo.com/how_do_i_find_out_whos_at_a_particular_ip_address.html</a></p>
<p> If there was an easier and <em>legal </em>way to do it, I'd know about it.(and if I'm wrong here, I'd love to know about it because it would make my investigations that much easier...so do tell....whisper if you have to) I suspect if the Irvine Company did indeed track us down by using some less legal technique, there is no way they could use the information as it would have been obtained illegally. (don't think they want that one hanging over them). If they tried it, I imagine we'd own them.</p>
<p>skek....you sound like a shill for IAC trying to scare people away from posting.</p>
<p>Read this people: <a href="http://ask-leo.com/how_do_i_find_out_whos_at_a_particular_ip_address.html">http://ask-leo.com/how_do_i_find_out_whos_at_a_particular_ip_address.html</a></p>
Rocker_IHB
New member
Yes, something like Tor will do the same as my ultra-complicated anonymizer.
reason, once that you connect through an internet provider that it doesn't know anything about you, you're not their customer, you don't have an account with them, you can hide there, for example, when you go to a Panera bread (and now Corner Bakery too) they just assign you an internet address from their pool of available addresses and then you can start using their free Internet service, but there's no way for them to identify who is using that, and more important, where does he/she live,
reason, once that you connect through an internet provider that it doesn't know anything about you, you're not their customer, you don't have an account with them, you can hide there, for example, when you go to a Panera bread (and now Corner Bakery too) they just assign you an internet address from their pool of available addresses and then you can start using their free Internet service, but there's no way for them to identify who is using that, and more important, where does he/she live,