So is it LL rhetoric time now?
Liar Loan said:
Living/working in Irvine is anecdotal evidence, not data.
Except for the fact that being and owner and a buyer of several properties in Irvine allowed me to know more about the market at that time than you... or anyone who did not live or shop Irvine at that time. That experience is just as important as data... and at times, more important because it can see things that data can't. I remember I was one of the few who said FCBs will keep Irvine from dropping as far and as fast as other cities... all the data mongers (including Larry) thought otherwise.
You claim that the exact model of house you prefer outperforms all others. Hmmm... It just doesn't sound unbiased when every aspect of the city, neighborhood, floor plan, and garage width that you prefer happen to be the ones that outperform all others.
Not all others.. just your condo. Sounds like your bias not mine.
As for garage width, I just cited what Larry posted on his blog. Since he seems to be the top authority on all things Irvine real estate to you... take it up with him.
It also doesn't sound unbiased when somebody like me points out that Irvine is declining in value, and you get kind of upset about it. That sounds like emotional attachment to your chosen city and home.
Hah. When have I ever got upset about it? I've actually joined in with you on Irvine bashing. I always have contended that Irvine is overpriced... even CV quoted a post back from 2013 when I said that. You're projecting your own bias again.
Larry used to talk about confirmation bias all the time, and I think this is a prime example. In your head, you have already concluded that Irvine outperforms all other markets, so you embrace any data that supports that position, and look to discredit any data that runs contrary to it.
Uh... already proved that Irvine outperformed all the safe haven coastal cities you listed. That was data... not my bias. That's when you started dancing... "Oh well... it was the FCBs!" and "Oh well... what about in the 90s?".
Have you posted any data to show me that Irvine did not outperform other markets in the last 2 downturns? Isn't that your bias?
When I realized my condo was declining in value in '06, I didn't try to avoid the bad news or rationalize it in my head, I went looking for information on why it was happening, which is how I discovered the Lansner blog. Embracing reality helps you learn from mistakes and sets you up for future success.
And as I've said before... this is where I made a mistake. Instead of listening to my own bias, I sold an Irvine home looking at the data and thinking it would decrease in value. There were other reasons too, but that was one of them. Had we held it, we would have been in a much better position financially, but at the same time, we would have probably had to give up some other things to afford that mortgage at that time (private preschool)... so we don't consider it a net loss.
So that's the reality, Irvine is more stable than surround cities (as proven by both data and experience)... embrace it.
BTW: Like Steve Thomas, Lasner and even Larry have their own biases too. If you think Larry was totally right, I have 2 words for you... interest rates.