Happiness said:bones said:PatrickStar said:All that said, how do you reconcile the fact you made the a different decision, and inexplicably purchased immediately adjacent to the LARGEST PUBLIC PARK in Orange County? Maybe California? Actually, wasn't it supposed to rival Central Park at one time? See, here is the thing about PUBLIC space like that...it belongs to the PUBLIC. To the taxpayers of Irvine. It's not your private park. You don't have veto rights over what goes in that park, all 200,000+ taxpayers in Irvine own that park. And unfortunately a lot of them probably would like to see things there you don't. And the fact you don't like it is not their problem, its yours.
Even setting aside the cemetery issue, and the toxic land, and the landfill, and the prison...I still don't get how somebody could make the choice to live right next to a monstrosity of a public place like that, unless they really like traffic, crowds, and noise. Even if a cemetery NEVER goes in, you are still going to have to deal with crowds of people descending on that park all the time for everything from soccer tournaments to concerts in the park to city holiday celebrations and yes, probably regular military ceremonies. And its not going to be people from your neighborhood, either. Imagine the riff raff clogging that park from places like (gasp!) Santa Ana and Foothill Ranch. No thanks, somebody else can have all that hassle next door. I feel your pain. Unfortunately, all this applies cemetery or no cemetery. Even if you win this battle, you probably lost the war the day you chose Great Park Neighborhoods rather than some of the other choices you had at the time. Places you would have controlled better, such as Laguna Altura or Orchard Hills.
I understand where you're coming from. But that passionate speech should really be reserved for the folks that buy at Beacon Park and the future GP neighborhoods. From a location standpoint, Pavilion Park is really no different than other parts of Portola Springs, Stonegate, Woodbury. Its distance to the public spaces at the Great Park is pretty "far"... in fact, wasn't that a negative when comparing Beacon Park to Pavilion Park in another thread? And traffic generated by the GP may get bad but again, every neighborhood along the Sand Canyon corridor will be affected.
I'll just repeat what I've been saying for a long time on this thread:
1. All of the existing neighborhoods, including PP, are pretty far away from the proposed cemetery site. PP is no closer to the proposed site than Portola Springs, Lambert Ranch, or Baker Ranch. If you live in PP, you should be emphasizing how far away from the proposed site PP is rather than give people the false impression you are right next to the proposed site which can only serve to lower your resale value.
2. There are future 5P communities that may indeed be close to the proposed cemetery site. Your solution is to not buy there if you don't want to live near a potential cemetery. Pretty simple, huh?
This is why I don't think that groups strategy is very effective. But I also don't know the ins and outs of their day to day operation. Personally, I think trotting Yaliu on TI as the messenger brings ZERO value or gain to their argument. Having said that, its a fight he wants to fight and I respect that.