SCOTUS

NEW -> Contingent Buyer Assistance Program
WTTCHMN said:
Perspective said:
Kavanaugh should be introduced now, as a Supreme Court Justice, Yale undergrad, Yale Law School, and Renate alumnist.

Alumnius, alumnist...

Gee,your spelling is as shitty as Kavanaugh's.
Don't be so hard on Perspective, he spells better that some people with a masters from Stanford and PhD from USC.
 
Happiness said:
fortune11 said:
morekaos said:
And the Koch Brothers and Asher Adelson are bogymen for the left...so what?  Is it not bigoted because they're white or Gasp... Jewish?

Adelsons contribution is documented by Bloomberg , and verified w election filings . He is the single biggest donor for the midterms . There are also various inside the who?re house sources detailing his influence on the state department  .

As opposed to the tinfoil hat theories about Soros every time the right wing swamp needs a monster  :)

Not just right wing Americans dislike Mr. Soros. Soros is a global currency manipulator. Ask the families of the thousands of Thai and Malaysians who committed suicide in 1997 what they think of Mr. Soros. One of the reasons the RMB is not freely tradable is the PRC trying to protect itself from global manipulators like Soros.
https://www.scmp.com/news/china/eco...ng-kong-sent-billionaire-george-soros-packing

Sorry but You have No damn clue how global currency markets work . I will leave it at that .  Do your self a favor and get out of this conspiracy mindset .

I would give a 101 tutorial on this at some time  , but this is the wrong thread . All I will say is , had Soros not shorted the sterling back when he made his first fortune , some other hedge fund would have, Soros was just early and quick .

The bass brothers , staunch republicans , got their clock cleaned shorting the yuan unsuccessfully 2 years ago. This is what rich guys who think they are smarter than everyone else , and with too much time and money on their hands,  do . 

On a macro level , Shorts are what keeps the markets , governments and central banks honest .
 
fortune11 said:
Happiness said:
fortune11 said:
morekaos said:
And the Koch Brothers and Asher Adelson are bogymen for the left...so what?  Is it not bigoted because they're white or Gasp... Jewish?

Adelsons contribution is documented by Bloomberg , and verified w election filings . He is the single biggest donor for the midterms . There are also various inside the who?re house sources detailing his influence on the state department  .

As opposed to the tinfoil hat theories about Soros every time the right wing swamp needs a monster  :)

Not just right wing Americans dislike Mr. Soros. Soros is a global currency manipulator. Ask the families of the thousands of Thai and Malaysians who committed suicide in 1997 what they think of Mr. Soros. One of the reasons the RMB is not freely tradable is the PRC trying to protect itself from global manipulators like Soros.
https://www.scmp.com/news/china/eco...ng-kong-sent-billionaire-george-soros-packing

All I will say is , had Soros not shorted the sterling back when he made his first fortune , some other hedge fund would have, Soros was just early and quick .

There are some Jewish people to this day who will not ride Metrolink because it is operated by a subsidiary of the French railroad company SNCF. Back in WWII, SNCF has a contract with the German government to deport Jewish civilians from Western European cities to the camps in the east. SNCF sent over 76,000 Jewish men, women, and children to be murdered in the extermination camps. SNCF's reason why they did that?: if we didn't do it, there were plenty of other railroad companies in Europe who would have so it wouldn't have made any difference. 
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...mps-seeks-secure-billion-dollar-contract.html
 
OMG , we are really off the deep end now ? and here I thought only liberals resorted to labeling w ?nazi? comparisons when they were sore losers ...  guess nazi labeling is an equal opportunity profession

Are Republicans really going to compare short sellers ?- the lifeblood of capitalism and free markets ? to nazis enablers ?

Elon musk has a job waiting for you :)
 
morekaos said:
Mark my words, even if they get all of this new testimony they will get nothing new to add. All the votes will remain exactly the same. This is a colossal stall tactic, all ?witnesses ? will simply re read their current sworn affidavits and nothing new. He will be seated for the next session

missed Tuesday but ahhhhh....yah
 
you don't say?! isn't it funny how after losing, democrats now want to walk back the praise they had for creepy porn lawyer?  what happened to believing all women?  during the hearing process, the democrats were not the least bit afraid of using swetnick's claims to push their smear of kavanaugh.

Democrats say Avenatti undercut their case against Kavanaugh

A host of Democratic senators and senior aides told CNN that the allegations from Avenatti's client gave the GOP an opening to conflate -- and dismiss -- all the allegations in one broad brush.

"Well you know at some point there were a lot of folks coming forward making all sorts of accusations," said Sen. Gary Peters, a Michigan Democrat, when asked about the allegations raised by Avenatti and his client. "It turns it into a circus atmosphere and certainly that's not where we should be."

Asked if Avenatti was helpful, Peters said: "I think we should have focused on the serious allegations that certainly appeared very credible to me that would be our best course of action."
Privately, the assessment was far more scathing.

"Democrats and the country would have been better off if Mr. Avenatti spent his time on his Iowa vanity project rather than meddling in Supreme Court fights," a senior Senate Democratic aide fumed, referring to Avenatti toying with the idea of seeking the Democratic presidential nomination. "His involvement set us back, absolutely."

A Democratic senator, who asked to remain anonymous to speak candidly, said: "Not helpful at all. I think Susan was always yes, but Avenatti was a useful foil."

Reached for comment Saturday, Avenatti pushed back, criticizing anonymous Democrats as "cowards" and saying the assessment shows the "failed leadership" in the Democratic Party.
"It is outrageous that these so-called Democrats would attack a sexual assault victim from coming forward," Avenatti told CNN. "I guess their position is that she should have shut her mouth and remained silent? It is disgusting that these cowards blame my client and the other accusers from coming forward.""

https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/06/politics/democrats-avenatti-swetnick-accusation/index.html
 
The attorney, behind whom the Reps hid in cowardice, might be facing professional misconduct incquiries:

Rachel Mitchell Violated National Prosecutorial Standardshttps://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/rachel-mitchell-violated-national-prosecutorial-143739791.html

Her State Bar should be interested in that letter she wrote too, suggesting "no reasonable prosecutor" would charge a crime in this case. She came to this conclusion having barely asked the alleged perp any questions.

Job well done prosecutor! Not sure why you accepted this request. Hope you were paid well.
 
Perspective said:
The attorney, behind whom the Reps hid in cowardice, might be facing professional misconduct incquiries:

Rachel Mitchell Violated National Prosecutorial Standardshttps://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/rachel-mitchell-violated-national-prosecutorial-143739791.html

Her State Bar should be interested in that letter she wrote too, suggesting "no reasonable prosecutor" would charge a crime in this case. She came to this conclusion having barely asked the alleged perp any questions.

Job well done prosecutor! Not sure why you accepted this request. Hope you were paid well.

Would you be surprised to learn that several cities here in Southern California have contracts with private law firms to act as the official city prosecutor? In other words, there is nothing unethical about a private attorney acting as a public prosecutor or a public prosecutor acting as a private attorney so long as there is no direct conflict of interest and there are ethical walls in place at the firms.
 
Happiness said:
Perspective said:
The attorney, behind whom the Reps hid in cowardice, might be facing professional misconduct incquiries:

Rachel Mitchell Violated National Prosecutorial Standardshttps://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/rachel-mitchell-violated-national-prosecutorial-143739791.html

Her State Bar should be interested in that letter she wrote too, suggesting "no reasonable prosecutor" would charge a crime in this case. She came to this conclusion having barely asked the alleged perp any questions.

Job well done prosecutor! Not sure why you accepted this request. Hope you were paid well.

Would you be surprised to learn that several cities here in Southern California have contracts with private law firms to act as the official city prosecutor? In other words, there is nothing unethical about a private attorney acting as a public prosecutor or a public prosecutor acting as a private attorney so long as there is no direct conflict of interest and there are ethical walls in place at the firms.

Okay... Thanks for sharing. Now, care to share how this is remotely relevant to my comment?
 
Perspective said:
The attorney, behind whom the Reps hid in cowardice, might be facing professional misconduct incquiries:

Rachel Mitchell Violated National Prosecutorial Standardshttps://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/rachel-mitchell-violated-national-prosecutorial-143739791.html

Her State Bar should be interested in that letter she wrote too, suggesting "no reasonable prosecutor" would charge a crime in this case. She came to this conclusion having barely asked the alleged perp any questions.

Job well done prosecutor! Not sure why you accepted this request. Hope you were paid well.

this is an opinion piece likely written by someone who got their feelings hurt by the outcome. where does it say that mitchell might be facing professional misconduct inquiries?  i don't see anywhere in the article where it states anyone is even looking into this.
 
Just abolish the damn supreme  court and move on ... it may eventually come to that .

If the backward portion of red states want to ban abortion , let them . They will lose industry and jobs and become even more parasitic on the federal government . Sometime you have to plumb the depths of moral and literal bankruptcy to be able to rise up from it.
 
Kings said:
Perspective said:
The attorney, behind whom the Reps hid in cowardice, might be facing professional misconduct incquiries:

Rachel Mitchell Violated National Prosecutorial Standardshttps://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/rachel-mitchell-violated-national-prosecutorial-143739791.html

Her State Bar should be interested in that letter she wrote too, suggesting "no reasonable prosecutor" would charge a crime in this case. She came to this conclusion having barely asked the alleged perp any questions.

Job well done prosecutor! Not sure why you accepted this request. Hope you were paid well.

this is an opinion piece likely written by someone who got their feelings hurt by the outcome. where does it say that mitchell might be facing professional misconduct inquiries?  i don't see anywhere in the article where it states anyone is even looking into this.

Read it again. Try harder.
 
Perspective said:
Kings said:
Perspective said:
The attorney, behind whom the Reps hid in cowardice, might be facing professional misconduct incquiries:

Rachel Mitchell Violated National Prosecutorial Standardshttps://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/rachel-mitchell-violated-national-prosecutorial-143739791.html

Her State Bar should be interested in that letter she wrote too, suggesting "no reasonable prosecutor" would charge a crime in this case. She came to this conclusion having barely asked the alleged perp any questions.

Job well done prosecutor! Not sure why you accepted this request. Hope you were paid well.

this is an opinion piece likely written by someone who got their feelings hurt by the outcome. where does it say that mitchell might be facing professional misconduct inquiries?  i don't see anywhere in the article where it states anyone is even looking into this.

Read it again. Try harder.

10/10
 
Perspective said:
Kings said:
Perspective said:
The attorney, behind whom the Reps hid in cowardice, might be facing professional misconduct incquiries:

Rachel Mitchell Violated National Prosecutorial Standardshttps://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/rachel-mitchell-violated-national-prosecutorial-143739791.html

Her State Bar should be interested in that letter she wrote too, suggesting "no reasonable prosecutor" would charge a crime in this case. She came to this conclusion having barely asked the alleged perp any questions.

Job well done prosecutor! Not sure why you accepted this request. Hope you were paid well.

this is an opinion piece likely written by someone who got their feelings hurt by the outcome. where does it say that mitchell might be facing professional misconduct inquiries?  i don't see anywhere in the article where it states anyone is even looking into this.

Read it again. Try harder.

You mean i actually have to read something as opposed to pasting a gif or video to own the libs ? 

Naaah
 
Oh please, Rachel Mitchell was pawn, used and discarded, she didn't even make thru the 2nd half before the Senate Republicans discarded her.  She willingly participated in a political pony show and she knew it.  She was clear.

Crystal clear when she, the seasoned prosecutor questioned the witness as to why  didn't insist on an appropriate forensic interview.

Sorry Ms. Prosecutor, why didn't you?  You're the professional prosecutor stepping up to the National stage?

And if her attorney's railroaded it, why did you play along?

I'm tired of this shit.

I'm tired of the shit I keep seeing in my media feeds.  They're really fucking clear.

ford.JPG


That's about as tame as the many versions of that I've seen get.  Let that sink in. Birds of a feather.





 
this thread is yesterday's news.  let me know when mitchell actually faces any consequences, when kavanaugh is actually impeached, or when your precious roe v wade is overturned (spoiler: none of those will happen).  till then, see you back in this thread when trump is ready to nominate his 3rd scotus justice.
 
Kings said:
this thread is yesterday's news.  let me know when mitchell actually faces any consequences, when kavanaugh is actually impeached, or when your precious roe v wade is overturned (spoiler: none of those will happen).  till then, see you back in this thread when trump is ready to nominate his 3rd scotus justice.

Going by your logic , you should continue ignoring everything on the political threads ? since when has even  trump faced any consequences for his actions ? So why bother

But you pop up every now and then to show everyone how ?smart ? you are by pretending to ignore the very topic that you are responding to

And let me add a smiley face to the end of my post , to enhance the coolness factor - :)  there . Now I am ignoring everything , fellas ? Don?t you see it
 
Back
Top