SCOTUS

NEW -> Contingent Buyer Assistance Program
Perspective said:
Wait, I'm so confused. Do Trump enthusiasts care about perjury, or not?
Click to expand...

only when the entire basis of the assault accusation has now been rendered unreliable.  do you care?
 
Kings said:
Perspective said:
Wait, I'm so confused. Do Trump enthusiasts care about perjury, or not?
Click to expand...

only when the entire basis of the assault accusation has now been rendered unreliable.  do you care?
Click to expand...

Wait, is that true? You can presume Ford's story is false. Even then, there's plenty in Kavanaugh's testimony for reasonable prudent people to conclude he's completely unfit for SCOTUS.
 
The FBI isn't seriously considering not interviewing Kavanaugh, are they? Is the White House excluding this interview from the investigatory scope? Someone needs to corner Kavanaugh in his multiple under oath lies. The Dems on the Senate Committee proved inept at this.

It sounds like they've lost Flake. I don't know how he can vote Yes after the concerns he's sharing daily.

Trump was Trump last night, mocking alleged sexual assault victims. Supporting this President is a reflection of your character.
 
There is just no such thing as a perfect person, memory or witness...get on with the vote.

Senate Judiciary Chairman hopping mad after ex-boyfriend of Christine Ford says she WASN'T afraid of flying or closed spaces ? and once coached friend on how to take polygraph

An ex-boyfriend of Christine Blasey Ford has come forward to contradict her testimony that she was claustrophobic and had trouble flying as a result
The mystery ex says he lived with Ford for a time, and dated her for a period of six years, and witnessed her coaching a friend on passing a lie detector test.
Ford denied under oath that she had ever done that at her Capitol Hill hearing
Also claimed that she has claustrophopia since she was assaulted in high school, allegedly by Supreme Court Justice nominee Brett Kavanuagh

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6235637/Ex-boyfriend-Christine-Ford-says-WASNT-afraid-flying-closed-spaces.html
 
You're typically the Anecdote King, but today you're using a strawman. Who has argued the SCOTUS nominee must be a "perfect person"?
 
The Dems knew that demanding a delay would eventually result in the revelation of Dr. Ford's lies. That's why they are already moving on to the "even if Dr. Ford is lying, BK does not have the temperament to be on the SC" argument. Do the Dems care that they induced their star witness to perjure herself and ruin her life in other ways? Hell no. To the Dems, Dr. Ford is just cannon fodder to be used and discarded to achieve their political goals.
 
Happiness said:
The Dems knew that demanding a delay would eventually result in the revelation of Dr. Ford's lies. That's why they are already moving on to the "even if Dr. Ford is lying, BK does not have the temperament to be on the SC" argument. Do the Dems care that they induced their star witness to perjure herself and ruin her life in other ways? Hell no. To the Dems, Dr. Ford is just cannon fodder to be used and discarded to achieve their political goals.
Click to expand...

So, what you're saying is, the FBI should investigate this allegation further to determine if Ford perjured herself? I agree. You're also saying perjury is a very serious offense. I agree. The logical conclusion is, a SCOTUS nominee who perjures himself/herself, should not advance to SCOTUS. Agreed?
 
Perspective said:
Happiness said:
The Dems knew that demanding a delay would eventually result in the revelation of Dr. Ford's lies. That's why they are already moving on to the "even if Dr. Ford is lying, BK does not have the temperament to be on the SC" argument. Do the Dems care that they induced their star witness to perjure herself and ruin her life in other ways? Hell no. To the Dems, Dr. Ford is just cannon fodder to be used and discarded to achieve their political goals.
Click to expand...

So, what you're saying is, the FBI should investigate this allegation further to determine if Ford perjured herself? I agree. You're also saying perjury is a very serious offense. I agree. The logical conclusion is, a SCOTUS nominee who perjures himself/herself, should not advance to SCOTUS. Agreed?
Click to expand...

Yes, I agree.
 
Democrats and Republicans are party first country second.  You can see it by the way they vote.
Republicans obstructed obama as much as possible & now Democrats are going to do the same.

This is our new normal.  Bend over and take it.
...as Russia polarizes the two sides and giggle on the sidelines at all the funny headlines their troll farm creates.
 
Kavanaugh is going under the bus in the name of the mid-terms. 

Blame the Dems, be scared for sons, they're over turning the presumption of innocence, false accusations,  she's lying, little white lies about drinking from 36 years ago, blah, blah, blah,

They'll keep the report sealed, use its leak to further blame the Dems and inflame the base.

 
zubs said:
Democrats and Republicans are party first country second.  You can see it by the way they vote.
Republicans obstructed obama as much as possible & now Democrats are going to do the same.

This is our new normal.  Bend over and take it.
...as Russia polarizes the two sides and giggle on the sidelines at all the funny headlines their troll farm creates.
Click to expand...

Unfortunate, but true. This is politics.

Keep this in perspective though. During the Civil Rights Era, people were beaten and killed for expressing support.
 
Perspective said:
zubs said:
Democrats and Republicans are party first country second.  You can see it by the way they vote.
Republicans obstructed obama as much as possible & now Democrats are going to do the same.

This is our new normal.  Bend over and take it.
...as Russia polarizes the two sides and giggle on the sidelines at all the funny headlines their troll farm creates.
Click to expand...

Unfortunate, but true. This is politics.

Keep this in perspective though. During the Civil Rights Era, people were beaten and killed for expressing support.
Click to expand...
Think about the thousands who were beaten or killed under Chairman Mao based on uncorroborated allegations. Have you ever stepped on anyone's toes in your life? Exes, business partners, relatives, random acquaintances?  What if that person decides to lob a Dr. Ford caliber allegation at you? You will be doomed. "I believe women!", that's all the proof needed nowadays.
 
As I previously stated if the report is no limitation. I would be inclined to accept Brett as Supreme Court Judge.

But if the report is limited. I would say this is rigged!
 
More strawman arguments to support Kavanaugh - this time from Graham:

Sen. Graham booed at event while defending Kavanaughhttps://www.yahoo.com/news/sen-graham-booed-event-defending-160734183.html

Has anyone accused Kavanaugh of being a rapist, much less a serial rapist? Has anyone accused Kavanaugh of being a gang rapist?

The accusations are: 1) that he held a woman down, touched her against her will, placed his hand over her mouth, and she escaped; and 2) he attended at least one party where others were engaged in group sex with drunk women.

You're better than this Lindsey. What's goin' on?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top