irvinehomeowner said:I think the unemployment was inevitable.
We can%u2019t flatten the curve if we don%u2019t keep people from gathering.
What could have been done differently where places didn%u2019t have to close?
Soylent Green Is People said:To suggest that Trumpistas are low information voters betrays your contempt for a great number of Americans.
If we want to talk about "low information" why not delve into the screening of any damaging information about Biden? Imagine his standings in polls had the same level of vitriolic investigation had been done with Biden by ABC, NBC, CBS, NPR, WaPo, NYT, etc.
Had those groups been as active in providing actual information about Biden, amazing things would have occurred. Ask any "Person on the street" about Bidens unwillingness to get OBL and you'll get a blank stare because they weren't told. Ask them why Biden keeps harping on the Charlottesville "fine people" lie, when any rational reading of the verbatim transcript of that press conference will show the polar opposite happened. (Try the Politifact site for a copy) The same goes for "Trump called the Coronavirus a hoax" meme Biden pushes. Read the transcript as well - Dems saying nothing was being done was the Hoax, not the virus threat. Does the media challenge ANYTHING Biden says? No, which restricts information to those who actually need it.
The Low Information Voters you distain are the ones that rely on corporate media, spoon feeding them little else but pap and drivel. It's not these voters fault, but the media's.
eyephone said:irvinehomeowner said:I think the unemployment was inevitable.
We can%u2019t flatten the curve if we don%u2019t keep people from gathering.
What could have been done differently where places didn%u2019t have to close?
I was just saying his inaction and congratulation to China President led the this to mass unemployment and recession.
Lets save money and cut the disease team budget with the CDC. (It is not that easy)
Although it?s true that Trump?s fiscal year 2021 budget proposal does propose a funding cut to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), that budget has not been enacted.
As The Washington Post explains, those funding cuts target the CDC?s chronic disease activities:
HHS officials said they want the CDC to focus on its core mission of preventing and controlling infectious diseases and on other emerging public health issues, such as opioid abuse.
Also in 2018, news reports circulated about an 80% reduction in the CDC?s program that worked in various countries to fight epidemics. That was the result of the anticipated depletion of previously allotted funding. But those budget cuts ultimately didn?t happen, CDC told FactCheck.org, because Congress provided other funding. For fiscal year 2021, President Trump has requested that CDC funding for global disease detection and other programs be increased further ? to $225 million total, with $175 million going directly to global health security.?
irvinehomeowner said:eyephone said:irvinehomeowner said:I think the unemployment was inevitable.
We can%u2019t flatten the curve if we don%u2019t keep people from gathering.
What could have been done differently where places didn%u2019t have to close?
I was just saying his inaction and congratulation to China President led the this to mass unemployment and recession.
I disagree. The pandemic and the call for social distancing caused unemployment. That was going to happen regardless of who was in office. Please don't mix the two.
Lets save money and cut the disease team budget with the CDC. (It is not that easy)
So I'm starting to fact check these statements and I found this:
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-cut-cdc-budget/?collection-id=242252
Although it%u2019s true that Trump%u2019s fiscal year 2021 budget proposal does propose a funding cut to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), that budget has not been enacted.
As The Washington Post explains, those funding cuts target the CDC%u2019s chronic disease activities:
So the cuts were aimed not at pandemics but chronic diseases like diabetes etc.
HHS officials said they want the CDC to focus on its core mission of preventing and controlling infectious diseases and on other emerging public health issues, such as opioid abuse.
So not only did they want the CDC to focus on things like coronavirus but also your other hot issue of opioid abuse.
The site also states that Trump *increased" CDC funding for global disease detection:
Also in 2018, news reports circulated about an 80% reduction in the CDC%u2019s program that worked in various countries to fight epidemics. That was the result of the anticipated depletion of previously allotted funding. But those budget cuts ultimately didn%u2019t happen, CDC told FactCheck.org, because Congress provided other funding. For fiscal year 2021, President Trump has requested that CDC funding for global disease detection and other programs be increased further %u2014 to $225 million total, with $175 million going directly to global health security.%u201D
Again, I don't like Trump, but I also know that people tend to just hear what they want to hear (and this goes for both sides).
eyephone said:Total fake news.
This is not about Trump.
I think it is about me. It is clear you do not like me. To be honest I do not care. Lol
But man you do not know what you are talking about.
I never heard of that website and I am not going to click that link.
Snopes (/sno?ps/), formerly known as the Urban Legends Reference Pages, is a fact-checking website. It has been described as a "well-regarded reference for sorting out myths and rumors" on the Internet. It has also been seen as a source for validating and debunking urban legends and similar stories in American popular culture.
We all know that he has fumbled or shall I say the covid response. He even brought up the wall. (Like who cares)
We have innocent people with the covid virus dying. (Hospital workers, police, first responders and normal people are dying.)
irvinehomeowner said:eyephone said:Total fake news.
Just trying to get to the facts rather than just what we hear or read.
This is not about Trump.
Then why every time I ask you about Biden you come back with something about Trump? You still haven't answered my question about his leadership.
I think it is about me. It is clear you do not like me. To be honest I do not care. Lol
But man you do not know what you are talking about.
This is not actually about you. Many other people, news shows and sites have made the same claims and I wanted to check rather than just accept it as truth. The only reason I quoted you is because you keep posting the same things over and over again.
Notice, I'm not addressing you... just your claim about cutting CDC funding.
I never heard of that website and I am not going to click that link.
Then you are doing yourself an injustice. Snopes is well known for fact checking and citing their articles with non-partisan sources. It started out as a site that debunks urban legends but has grown into more than that:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snopes
Snopes (/sno?ps/), formerly known as the Urban Legends Reference Pages, is a fact-checking website. It has been described as a "well-regarded reference for sorting out myths and rumors" on the Internet. It has also been seen as a source for validating and debunking urban legends and similar stories in American popular culture.
We all know that he has fumbled or shall I say the covid response. He even brought up the wall. (Like who cares)
I can somewhat agree with this. I cringe whenever he speaks during those press conferences.
We have innocent people with the covid virus dying. (Hospital workers, police, first responders and normal people are dying.)
Sure... but you seem to be blaming only one person or administration when this is something that we all are part of. What is this statement trying to accomplish by saying "innocent" people are dying?
You ask me to address your posts but when I do, you call it fake news or say I don't know what I'm talking about. That's the other reason why I tend not to engage with you because you don't seem to want to have a civil discussion.
I'll just not respond again if that's okay with you.
eyephone said:I will continue to blame Trump and I guess I should start attacking you.
How is your heath and weight doing? I heard you like to eat a lot.
I assume it is getting better since stores are closed down. But I guess you can still buy junk food.
irvinehomeowner said:eyephone said:I will continue to blame Trump and I guess I should start attacking you.
How is your heath and weight doing? I heard you like to eat a lot.
I assume it is getting better since stores are closed down. But I guess you can still buy junk food.
Quoted before you delete.
irvinehomeowner said:So I want to get back to why Biden would make a good president.
Quite honestly, I would have preferred more "diversity" in the opposing candidate. As much as can be said about Obamastalgia, Biden is not an African American.
What will make Biden someone I can vote for (and I will already say I am NOT voting for Trump, but Biden needs to earn my vote).
Saying he is not orange isn't good enough.
Kenkoko said:irvinehomeowner said:So I want to get back to why Biden would make a good president.
Quite honestly, I would have preferred more "diversity" in the opposing candidate. As much as can be said about Obamastalgia, Biden is not an African American.
What will make Biden someone I can vote for (and I will already say I am NOT voting for Trump, but Biden needs to earn my vote).
Saying he is not orange isn't good enough.
I?m afraid you are looking for answers when there?s none. Biden?s strategy is brutally simple, keeping dem?s core constituencies, hold on to Liberals like Alyssa Millano and double down on suburban voters who can easily be won over by social issues.
It isn?t very different than what Trump is doing. Making calculated moves to solidify his core constituencies.
Biden isn?t doing anything to win your conservative vote just like Trump isn?t doing anything to win mine. That's just the crappy reality we live in.
Kenkoko said:Biden isn?t doing anything to win your conservative vote...