nosuchreality
Well-known member
Curious how people perceive the Clinton campaign calling for real time fact checking during the debate?
nosuchreality said:Curious how people perceive the Clinton campaign calling for real time fact checking during the debate?
BangBros said:I don't give a shit about Trump's tax return. Any business man/corporation evades taxes like a wildfire. They keep their money in offshore accounts and only bring enough of it here to pay the their employees a decent wage. That's how all the companies I've worked for done it.
So I don't really care if Trump paid a billion or $0 in taxes because the white folks (board of directors/CEOs) who I've worked for are equally guilty of the same shit.
Now what I REALLY want to know is the content of those 30,000+ emails that were deleted. If those emails are released, and they're clean, then I'm all Hillary 100%. But if those emails are never recovered, I have to wonder what the hell were in them.
BangBros said:Compressed-Village said:The message that he carried is "Make America Great Again" do you think if all business leaders and. corporate titans follow his foot steps and hurried their money over sea and pay ZERO tax that would make America great again?
Uhh... news flash.. they're ALREADY doing it!
"Nearly 20% of large U.S. corporations that reported a profit on their financial statements in 2012 ended up paying exactly nothing in U.S. corporate income taxes."
"General Electric, Boeing, Verizon and 23 other profitable Fortune 500 firms paid no federal income taxes from 2008 to 2012."
source:http://www.americansfortaxfairness.org/tax-fairness-briefing-booklet/fact-sheet-corporate-tax-rates/http://www.usatoday.com/story/money...-profitable-companies-paid-no-taxes/81399094/http://money.cnn.com/2016/04/13/pf/taxes/gao-corporate-taxes/
Every "business", "corporation", "small business" cheats the tax man in one way shape or form. The Chinese restaurant on Jeffrey that says "cash only" is cheating the system. The big dawg corporations are doing it. Everyone who files a shitload of meaningless deductions are doing it. It's just the degree of it, but everyone are all equally guilty of "making america great".
So to me Trump is no different than Verizon, GE, GM, and the rest of the 20% of corporations.
I don't care about cheating taxes. Because it's so prevalent in the business world. I'm not saying it's the right thing, but if you going to hold that against him, then you should be sue-ing your own employer who is probably one of the top 20% in the US paying 0 income taxes overall.
Now, let's get to the REAL PRESSING issue. What was in THOSE emails!!??!? Did they directly/indirectly cause the deaths in Benghazi? What top secret information was emailed to her unsecured email server in her basements that apparently Wikileaks and the FBI got involved? Lastly, why did her IT team all plead the 5th with the email scandal?
BangBros said:I don't make shit up. I back them up with facts and sourcepeppy said:it doesn't look too good when you argue that poor people paying no taxes = moochers and deadbeats and rich folks paying zero taxes = smart.
irvinehomeowner said:Wait, so if the "smart" companies aren't paying taxes, why would cutting taxes keep them from moving jobs out of the country?
I'm all for cutting taxes, but Trump's argument on how that would keep jobs doesn't jibe if the companies aren't paying those taxes. The deregulation part makes some sense but at the same time, regulation is there for many other reasons (public safety, unfair competition, etc).
I totally dislike Hillary's rhetoric as it's the same political double-speak we hear all the time but she did win the composure battle. I only saw the first half hour or so, but you can tell that it was Trump who kept getting riled up as he continued to interrupt her "2 minutes" while she stayed silent most of the time during his turns. However, she really didn't answer the questions Holt asked her and spent a lot of her time criticizing Trump which I guess was her game plan to expose how irritable he gets.
Trump stance on foreign trade did stump Hillary and I wish he could have got more into the detail on why NAFTA was bad instead of just saying it was, that would have helped his case.
It seemed like Holt was leaning more favorable towards Hillary because he seemed to push harder on the issues with Trump but again, I only watched a portion of it.
My takeaway is the same as before the debate, Trump is a businessman and Hillary is a politician, he wants to get things done and she wants to make it seem like things are getting done. Even if Trump does become prez, I think he doesn't realize how hard it is to get your way when you're not the one who is really in charge.
If I had to bet now, HRC has the edge and will probably be our next prez... and I'm moving to Canada.