President Trump

NEW -> Contingent Buyer Assistance Program
zubs said:
I heard on the radio today that nice and agreeable people make less money than assholes.  So if you teach your children to be nice and agreeable, you are stunting their income....quite the conundrum don't you think?

Not a conundrum to me. It isn't hard to make a good living and not be an asshole. Chasing a few more dollars is not worth being an asshole.
 
Obama gave GM a loan. We got paid back, with interest. For 1.5 million jobs.
Trump gave Carrier millions. No payback. For 800 jobs.

Will Trump still penalize Carrier for outsourcing 1,300 jobs to Mexico?
 
I beg to differ ...

General Motors Bailout Cost Taxpayers $11.2 Billion

The total cost of the government's bailout for General Motors has come to $11.2 billion after the Treasury sold the last of its assets in December

U.S. taxpayers lost more than $11.2 billion as a result of the federal bailout of General Motors, according to a government report released Wednesday.

The $11.2-billion loss includes a $826-million write-off in March from government investments in the ?Old GM? before the company?s 2009 bankruptcy, the report said. The U.S. government spent $49.5 billion to bail out GM, and after the company?s bankruptcy in 2009, the government?s investment was converted to a 61 percent equity stake in the company. The Treasury gradually sold off its stock in GM, selling its last shares in December 2013.


http://time.com/82953/general-motors-bailout-cost-taxpayers-11-2-billion/
 
tim said:
Obama gave GM a loan. We got paid back, with interest. For 1.5 million jobs.
Trump gave Carrier millions. No payback. For 800 jobs.

Will Trump still penalize Carrier for outsourcing 1,300 jobs to Mexico?

It seems like you think Obama is a good job creator and contributing to the economy. Why is our GDP growth stays around 1%? 45 million citizens on food stamps under his reign vs 32 mil in 2009.
 
Not everything is based upon GDP growth.

Just look at the amount of people out of jobs in the market in 08/09 vs 16. HUUUUUUUUUUGE /trump voice

Food stamps? That's a whole nother enchilida right there.
 
B2FiNiTY said:
Not everything is based upon GDP growth.

Just look at the amount of people out of jobs in the market in 08/09 vs 16. HUUUUUUUUUUGE /trump voice

Food stamps? That's a whole nother enchilida right there.

So GDP growth is not an indicator of the healthiness of the economy?

Anyone who has a full time job should not be getting food stamps.
 
paperboyNC said:
Movingup said:
Anyone who has a full time job should not be getting food stamps.

Depends on how many kids they have and whether or not they have a working spouse (or a spouse at all)

Everyone knows you are eligible to get food stamps if you have one minimum wage job and has 3 dependents.

The point is if Obama is so good with the economy and good paying jobs are so readily available, why are there 12 million more people on food stamps now compare to 8 years ago?
 

Attachments

  • growth_in_gdp-1930-2015-chart.jpg
    growth_in_gdp-1930-2015-chart.jpg
    157.6 KB · Views: 151
morekaos said:
I beg to differ ...

General Motors Bailout Cost Taxpayers $11.2 Billion

The total cost of the government's bailout for General Motors has come to $11.2 billion after the Treasury sold the last of its assets in December

U.S. taxpayers lost more than $11.2 billion as a result of the federal bailout of General Motors, according to a government report released Wednesday.

The $11.2-billion loss includes a $826-million write-off in March from government investments in the ?Old GM? before the company?s 2009 bankruptcy, the report said. The U.S. government spent $49.5 billion to bail out GM, and after the company?s bankruptcy in 2009, the government?s investment was converted to a 61 percent equity stake in the company. The Treasury gradually sold off its stock in GM, selling its last shares in December 2013.

http://time.com/82953/general-motors-bailout-cost-taxpayers-11-2-billion/

Ah, cool. Running the numbers comes to the GM deal and the Carrier deal each being about $9,000 per job. Trump's really gotten tough on those companies that are going to move jobs overseas! I'm glad my company hasn't threatened to do it, as I'd hate for the government to give us $9,000 per employee.

Did you hear Trump's latest idea - a 35% tax on goods sold by US companies that move jobs overseas? Yeah, that will end well. I don't think he understands how manufacturing companies work. Maybe because his business isn't in manufacturing. If that tax went through, US companies would be at a big disadvantage compared to companies based outside the US. Those foreign companies just wouldn't have to pay that tax for making their goods in China, Taiwan, Mexico, etc.
 
If I recall, both GM and Carrier are union jobs as well.

Big difference in how both of these were done. GM was direct investment. Carrier was State tax subsidies and promises of a Federal tax benefit once The Tang Menace is in charge. 
 
That's assuming all 1.2 million jobs were saved by blowing all that money.  Truth is (unlike what the press likes to think) a company does not shutter its doors and turn out all its workers when it reorganizes  in bk.  Most of those jobs would still exist today had they been able to reorg properly without the wasted government injection into the union and pension fund. There is a huge differance between lost money and tax relief
 
morekaos said:
That's assuming all 1.2 million jobs were saved by blowing all that money.  Truth is (unlike what the press likes to think) a company does not shutter its doors and turn out all its workers when it reorganizes in bk.  Most of those jobs would still exist today had they been able to reorg properly without the wasted government injection into the union and pension fund. There is a huge differance between lost money and tax relief

There's also a difference between helping a company weather a storm due to a horrible economy and helping a company that's just doing its normal thing. It is better to help in the first case rather than in the second. It should not be a surprise that tons of conservatives hate the Carrier deal. It isn't just those on the left.

Of course, none of us knows what would have happened to GM without the help. You don't know that most of the jobs would still be around. The 1.2 million jobs number comes from the Center for Automotive Research. The numbers may still be inaccurate, because we don't have access to the alternate universe where we did not do the bailout, but they didn't come from the press.
 
American Airlines still exists, United Airlines still exists, US Steel still exists albeit in better forms, that is what capitalism does, shapes efficient use of capital. It would have done the same in the auto industry. Cash for clunkers and the GM stock bailout just transferred tax dollars into union coffers. That GM stock the government bought went to $0.  The new issue stock, which the union and pension fund still own 60% of today is $35 a share...we got hosed.
 
morekaos said:
... that is what capitalism does, shapes efficient use of capital.

Then why are you cheering Trump's government intervention??? This is clearly an interference with free market forces where he (now head of government) picks and chooses "winners" and "losers". Same with imposing import tariffs.

 
morekaos said:
No, its tax relief. The one thing government controls, allows capital to stay with the corp to be more efficiently deployed,  like this....

Then all the credit should go to Pence since he is the one that controls that.





 
Back
Top