[quote author="Trooper" date=1229074777]<em>Do you actually know any Mormons on a personal level?</em>
Yes, I do. One is a co-worker who I've known for 10 years. We are close, but not to the point that we do things socially together.
Actually, this is a perfect example of what I'm saying. After Prop 8 passed, we had a discussion about it. I asked him how he voted and he said, "you know how I voted." (which of course, meant Yes on 8) I then asked him, how and why, knowing me for so many years.....would he do that? His answer? "The Church." When I pressed him what he meant by that, he said, "You know my religion is my life." I didn't ask him to elaborate further. We will no longer be friends and I explained exactly why to him. I mean, why would I be friendly with someone who believes that I am a second class citizen ?
The other example is that Manager from El Coyote restaurant in Hollywood, where they have several Prop 8 protests. She always welcomed gay customers, but donated to the Yes on 8 campaign. When it was discovered, she announced that it was due to the fact the Mormon Church told their followers to donate. She then went on to explain that she LOVES the gays, but she couldn't go against her church. WTF !
To me, that screams lemming.
Oh, and here comes <a href="http://www.advocate.com/news_detail_ektid67608.asp">The Vatican's stance: Gays don't need protection</a>
/snip/
<em>The Vatican has come out <strong>against</strong> a United Nations resolution that calls on all governments to decriminalize homosexuality.</em></blockquote>
All I can do is speak from my experience and my experience with Mormons couldn?t be more opposite than your experience. I would expect you, who has bemoaned the stereotyping of homosexuals, to acknowledge that, just like stereotyping every homosexual as an ass-less chap wearing cross dressing-gay pride parade attendee, stereotyping every Mormon (or all religious folk) as a mindless lemming 1) does not reflect reality and 2) is a flagrant form of prejudice in and of itself.
I don?t think either side can claim King as their own. Let?s not forget that MLK was extremely conservative in his religious beliefs; he was a Baptist minister. Although his wife has been supportive of homosexual marriage, his daughter has been as outspoken against it. The fact that a majority of African Americans do not support homosexual marriage coupled with the fact that prominent contemporary African American civil rights leaders do not support gay marriage (i.e. Jackson, Sharpton and Farakhan), who all pledge steadfast allegiance to King, indicates that King may not have been supportive of the issue. The truth is that no one in the homosexual debate can claim ownership of King because he never made his opinion known ? or may not have had a position at all.
To pigeonhole people who don?t support homosexual marriage as religious idiots is a classic straw man. I don?t think anyone would suggest that Bill Clinton, Obama or Biden are mindless religious lemmings ? yet all of them do not support homosexual marriage. If you frame the debate as civil rights vs. religious bigotry, you fail to address the real issue and you will not convince anyone to join your ranks.