Midterm Elections

NEW -> Contingent Buyer Assistance Program
Latest ABC poll ?

Trump - 36 percent approve, 60 percent disapprove


In case you ever wondered why grading on the curve works ?- That 36 percent also believes in Q Anon, pedophile colonies on mars, and the sanctity of Tucker Carlson : )

Oh , and shall we add ?boom? to it as well

 

Attachments

fortune11 said:
Latest ABC poll ?

Trump - 36 percent approve, 60 percent disapprove


In case you ever wondered why grading on the curve works ?- That 36 percent also believes in Q Anon, pedophile colonies on mars, and the sanctity of Tucker Carlson : )

Oh , and shall we add ?boom? to it as well

QAnon has a believer in the White House.

Trump Meets QAnon Kook Who Believes Democrats Run Pedophile Cult
https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-in-oval-office-meets-promoter-of-qanon-conspiracy-theory-that-says-democrats-run-pedophile-cult?source=articles&via=rss
 
Article: ?Rep. John Culberson (R-TX) is accused of raiding campaign funds for personal use, including a purchase of fossils to allegedly help him "understand climate science."

Rep. John Culberson (R-TX) is the subject of complaints to the Federal Elections Commission (FEC) questioning almost $50,000 in campaign spending on items like civil war memorabilia, coins, and other collectibles.?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/shareblue.com/john-culberson-texas-campaign-funds-personal-use/amp/


 
Perspective said:
fortune11 said:
Latest ABC poll ?

Trump - 36 percent approve, 60 percent disapprove


In case you ever wondered why grading on the curve works ?- That 36 percent also believes in Q Anon, pedophile colonies on mars, and the sanctity of Tucker Carlson : )

Oh , and shall we add ?boom? to it as well

QAnon has a believer in the White House.

Trump Meets QAnon Kook Who Believes Democrats Run Pedophile Cult
https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-in-oval-office-meets-promoter-of-qanon-conspiracy-theory-that-says-democrats-run-pedophile-cult?source=articles&via=rss

Yes this is what bringing ?dignity? back to the White House means

The really striking number from this ABC poll isn't that 60 percent disapprove of Trump. It's that 53 percent ?strongly? disapprove ? A majority.  Don't think I've ever seen that of a president .
 
fortune11 said:
Latest ABC poll ?

Trump - 36 percent approve, 60 percent disapprove


In case you ever wondered why grading on the curve works ?- That 36 percent also believes in Q Anon, pedophile colonies on mars, and the sanctity of Tucker Carlson : )

Oh , and shall we add ?boom? to it as well

If I had any faith in current polling (and I don't), that is what the "pros" call an outlier. More like a "snap" then a Boom.

RCP Average 8/15 - 8/30 --     42.8 53.9      -11.1
Rasmussen Reports 8/28 - 8/30 1500 LV 48 50 -2
ABC News/Wash Post 8/26 - 8/29 879 RV 38 60 -22
Economist/YouGov 8/26 - 8/28 1249 RV 43 52 -9

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_trump_job_approval-6179.html
 
eyephone said:
Article: ?Rep. John Culberson (R-TX) is accused of raiding campaign funds for personal use, including a purchase of fossils to allegedly help him "understand climate science."

Rep. John Culberson (R-TX) is the subject of complaints to the Federal Elections Commission (FEC) questioning almost $50,000 in campaign spending on items like civil war memorabilia, coins, and other collectibles.?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/shareblue.com/john-culberson-texas-campaign-funds-personal-use/amp/

Is this a pre-req?  ;)
 
eyephone said:
eyephone said:
Article: ?Rep. John Culberson (R-TX) is accused of raiding campaign funds for personal use, including a purchase of fossils to allegedly help him "understand climate science."

Rep. John Culberson (R-TX) is the subject of complaints to the Federal Elections Commission (FEC) questioning almost $50,000 in campaign spending on items like civil war memorabilia, coins, and other collectibles.?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/shareblue.com/john-culberson-texas-campaign-funds-personal-use/amp/

Is this a pre-req?  ;)

Yes corruption,  toadism and racism are qualifiers for the Republican Party of today and not the other way around

This is why I was supportive of that DeSantis guy in Florida - he stands a very good chance given the magnetic pull of these features on the base
 
As promised

- new treaty requires cars to have 75 percent NAFTA content . What was it before ? 62.5 percent . So the increase really just affects 3 models that don?t have a whole lot of volumes and can easily be fixed (Nissan Versa, Audi sq5 and fiat 500)


- new treaty requires atleast 40 to 45 percent of content come from factories making 16 dollars an hour . As with everything , this can be gamed . Regardless , since other locations beyond Mexico already have higher wages (like Europe) this really only affects cars w atleast 55 percent Mexican content - this affects about 25 percent of the cars

- we asked for 800 dollars min value for duty free and fast track processing of US exports , we got 100 dollars (right now it is 50)

Mexico can?t weaken its currency to game this per the agreement . But if any of you are watching all this emerging market chaos going on , Mexico desperately needs a strong currency so it can continue easy monetary policy and not strangle its economy .


That s really it . Seems to me like automakers had a big hand in writing this to avoid any meaningful damage to their existing supply chains .

And yes , they have until 2024 to implement all this

So yes , this is good for America ? in the sense that they didn?t really change much to cause too much damage to the existing free trade .

But everyone can go home happy because our genius negotiator came out on top as he always does :)
 
will we see a republican gov in nov?

Newsom Leads Cox for Governor, But Not by Large Margin ? Feinstein over de Le?n
September 6, 2018/in News, Insights & Research /by Probolsky Research
We included the races for CA Governor and U.S. Senate on our latest statewide poll. We conducted this poll and present these results for public interest purposes. We have no client in these races.
Governor
44% Newsom ? D
39% Cox ? R
17% Unsure
-Cox well outperforms his GOP base (fewer than 25% of all California voters)
-Cox captures a similar percentage of the Latino voter as Newsom
-Intensity of support is strong for both candidates
https://www.probolskyresearch.com/2018/09/06/newsom-leads-cox-for-governor-but-not-by-large-margin-feinstein-over-de-leon/
 
Kings said:
will we see a republican gov in nov?

Newsom Leads Cox for Governor, But Not by Large Margin ? Feinstein over de Le?n
September 6, 2018/in News, Insights & Research /by Probolsky Research
We included the races for CA Governor and U.S. Senate on our latest statewide poll. We conducted this poll and present these results for public interest purposes. We have no client in these races.
Governor
44% Newsom ? D
39% Cox ? R
17% Unsure
-Cox well outperforms his GOP base (fewer than 25% of all California voters)
-Cox captures a similar percentage of the Latino voter as Newsom
-Intensity of support is strong for both candidates
https://www.probolskyresearch.com/2018/09/06/newsom-leads-cox-for-governor-but-not-by-large-margin-feinstein-over-de-leon/

Bud Light Real American Hero #420: Mr. Ask Your Best Friend for His Help and Loyalty While Screwing His Wife - Gavin Newsome
 
If you take away the tofu, Ted Cruz's caricature of California most fits Orange County Republicans. I can see his point ...


Cruz: Democrats want Texas to be 'like California,' have 'tofu' and 'dyed hair'

Washington (CNN) ? Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz told supporters at a rally on Saturday that Democrats wanted to make Texas like California and listed off a few things as stereotypical staples of the blue state.

"We are seeing tens of millions of dollars flooding into the state of Texas from liberals all over the country who desperately want to turn the state of Texas blue," Cruz said. "They want us to be just like California, right down to tofu and silicon and dyed hair."

Cruz added that his wife, Heidi Cruz, was "a California vegetarian."

"She's wonderful, but I brought her to the great state of Texas," Cruz said.
 
Happiness said:
Kings said:
will we see a republican gov in nov?

Newsom Leads Cox for Governor, But Not by Large Margin ? Feinstein over de Le?n
September 6, 2018/in News, Insights & Research /by Probolsky Research
We included the races for CA Governor and U.S. Senate on our latest statewide poll. We conducted this poll and present these results for public interest purposes. We have no client in these races.
Governor
44% Newsom ? D
39% Cox ? R
17% Unsure
-Cox well outperforms his GOP base (fewer than 25% of all California voters)
-Cox captures a similar percentage of the Latino voter as Newsom
-Intensity of support is strong for both candidates
https://www.probolskyresearch.com/2018/09/06/newsom-leads-cox-for-governor-but-not-by-large-margin-feinstein-over-de-leon/

Bud Light Real American Hero #420: Mr. Ask Your Best Friend for His Help and Loyalty While Screwing His Wife - Gavin Newsome

He's having a hard time gaining traction with Latinos.  Black & brown people, despite being Democrats, generally are not super liberal.  They have a hard time connecting with progressive socialists, especially wealthy white liberals like Newsom.  More moderate Democrats like Bill Clinton & Jerry Brown that can project a relatable, working class ethic tend to do much better with people of color.

I'm not sure if the ability to post YouTube videos is now disabled, but here is a link to one of Clinton's greatest debate moments:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ta_SFvgbrlY
 
Liar Loan said:
He's having a hard time gaining traction with Latinos.  Black & brown people, despite being Democrats, generally are not super liberal.  They have a hard time connecting with progressive socialists, especially wealthy white liberals like Newsom.  More moderate Democrats like Bill Clinton & Jerry Brown that can project a relatable, working class ethic tend to do much better with people of color.

I'm not sure if the ability to post YouTube videos is now disabled, but here is a link to one of Clinton's greatest debate moments:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ta_SFvgbrlY

I think that all changed with Trump. 

First there's the fake news narrative of Trump calling all Mexicans criminals (which he never did).  People will believe it's an attack on them, even if it wasn't.
Then there's what Trump is actually doing, which paints illegal immigrants as violent criminals.  This argument has gone too far.  I'd guess that most Latinos in California know a few illegals.  Yes, there are violent illegals, but let's not kid ourselves. Most are good people who are just breaking a law.

The whole argument against illegal immigration has shifted to the point of gross exaggeration and fear tactics.  Valid arguments are drowned out and forgotten.  People don't like that, and IMO that will backfire. 
 

Now Trump is targeting Vietnamese refugees


In its insatiable quest to rid the U.S. of immigrants, the Trump administration has been rounding up Vietnamese refugees who have been in the country for more than a quarter of a century and trying to send them back to Vietnam ? despite a formal bilateral agreement that refugees who arrived here prior to the 1995 normalization of relations between the two countries would not be sent home.

In a number of cases, the refugees have been held in detention centers for months as the government sought to obtain travel documents from the Vietnamese government, and despite a Supreme Court decision that said the government could not detain someone for an extended period of time if it was unlikely the home country would accept the deportee.

After the end of the Vietnam War, and after the North Vietnamese communist government unified the country, hundreds of thousands of South Vietnamese ? many of whom fought alongside or cooperated with American forces ? fled for safety, often boarding rickety boats to cross the South China Sea. In many cases, the refugees were stateless, because they were citizens of South Vietnam, a country that dissolved with the end of the war.

Nearly 1.3 million eventually settled in the U.S., some 200,000 in and around Orange County?s Little Saigon.

That large a population is bound to include some people who break the law, and upward of 10,000 Vietnamese have been ordered deported by immigration judges after being convicted of often serious crimes in American criminal courts. But for more than three decades after the war ended, the Vietnamese government refused to accept deportees from the U.S., viewing the refugees as political enemies or possible American spies.

That changed in 2008, when the George W. Bush administration reached an agreement under which Vietnam would accept the return of deportees who had arrived in the U.S. after July 12, 1995. The wording of the pact is significant:

?Vietnamese citizens are not subject to return to Vietnam under this Agreement if they arrived in the United States before July 12, 1995, the date on which diplomatic relations were re-established between the U.S. Government and the Vietnamese Government. The U.S. Government and the Vietnamese Government maintain their respective legal positions relative to Vietnamese citizens who departed Vietnam for the United States prior to that date.?

For a decade that has been interpreted as a flat protection for the refugees. But the Trump administration argues in court filings ? immigrant rights organizations are suing to halt the detentions and deportations ? that the second sentence in effect negates the first, so the U.S. can deport Vietnamese refugees if they have committed acts that render them ineligible to remain in the U.S.

?The agreement does not in fact prohibit such removals,? the government argued in court documents. ?Rather, it provides merely that pre-1995 aliens cannot be removed under the terms of the agreement itself.?

That?s a specious argument. Until the agreement, Vietnam would not accept any deportees from the U.S.; after the agreement, it began accepting what are called post-1995 deportees. So the only mechanism for returning people to Vietnam falls under the agreement, regardless of U.S. laws. The Trump administration is simply trying to break the terms of the deal ? and so far has been successful in at least 11 cases, though it?s unclear why Vietnam agreed to let the deportees in. According to reports, the deportees have had trouble finding places to live and getting permission to work in Vietnam.

News accounts of the efforts have focused on refugees who arrived here as young (usually) men with limited social or family structure. A number of them fell in with gangs or individually committed crimes of varying seriousness, from drug possession to robbery and a few rare murders. Yet the issue here isn?t the crimes some refugees committed, but the circumstances of their arrival in the U.S., and the letter of the agreement with Vietnam.

This is yet another instance in which the Trump administration has just bulled its way forward to try to reduce the number of immigrants living in the U.S. If the government believes that it is in the nation?s best interest to deport Vietnamese refugees convicted of crimes, then it should reopen the 2008 agreement and create a lawful mechanism to do so.

http://www.latimes.com/opinion/la-ol-enter-the-fray-in-yet-another-heavy-handed-1536161234-htmlstory.html
 
You just need to watch Tucker Carlson?s segment attacking diversity to understand current GOP s racist mindset when it comes to nonwhites .

This is why the Republican party is desperately latching onto talking about ?immigration issues ? for the midterms and not running based on tax cuts (popular w the rich self employed people on this forum) and economic growth which should have been a slam dunk for anyone else .

If anyone thinks Latinos are going to start voting for these race baiters anytime soon , I have a bridge to sell you (or maybe a detached Irvine condo for 2m, how about that )
https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a23041183/tucker-carlson-diversity/
 
fortune11 said:
If anyone thinks Latinos are going to start voting for these race baiters anytime soon , I have a bridge to sell you (or maybe a detached Irvine condo for 2m, how about that )

Trump could not have been elected President without the 30% of Latinos that voted for him.  Currently, the CA governors race is split evenly between Newsom/Cox when polling Latinos.  They may hand Newsom a shocking loss if things don't shape up.

The race baiting argument from you is interesting.  You are definitely one of the worst on this forum, starting with your racism against whites about a year ago when you mistakenly thought it was whites and not other Asians dissing the mainland Chinese on TI.  That is called scapegoating.

If you want to stop the race baiting then be the change you want to see in the world.
 
diversity is our strength until it isn't.  as with all things, moderation is key.  zero diversity is just as bad as 100% diversity.  that is the point.  when things are too diverse then there are no common values.
 
Back
Top