qwerty said:The opposite is also true. When u try to attribute all good players and winning to analytics. All I know is I don't need analytics to tell you the 10 best players in the nba. And I don't need analytics to tell me if you have talent you win titles. Scouting has been around forever. If that is analytics then what is old school?
The eye test.
Using the eye test, you can see & name the 10 best players in the NBA. But with salary cap, luxury tax, etc, etc, in order to win championships, you need depth. IMO, that's where analytics come into play the most. Spurs do a good job finding players that are other teams castoffs. Boris Diaw comes to mind. I'm not saying analytics is the end all be all, bc let's be honest, lack of analytics ain't the reason the Lakers are in their predicament now. They have many issues: ownership, Kobe, coach, etc.