no_vaseline_IHB
New member
I loathe op-ed pieces. Occasionally you find a good one. This is a good one:
<a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-roberts25-2009jun25,0,2015715.story">http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-roberts25-2009jun25,0,2015715.story</a>
<strong>Why California can't be governed
Six key factors, including Prop. 13 and term limits, have brought California to the brink</strong>
<blockquote>Thirty years later, the ghost of Jarvis and his legacy initiative still aim antipathy, scorn and disdain at California's government and its leaders. Proposition 13 was the first, and most far-reaching, in a cascade of political decisions over the last three decades that have shaped the dysfunctional structure of governance in the state.
Simply put, California today is ungovernable.
As state and local officials struggle to weather the state's fiscal crisis, they wield power with the damaged machinery of a patchwork government system that lacks accountability, encourages stalemate and drifts but cannot be steered.
In this system, <em><strong>elected leaders carry responsibility, but not authority, for far-reaching policies about public revenues and resources</strong></em>. That's not governance -- it's reactive management of a deeply flawed status quo.
</blockquote>
I'm not going to cite the whole thing, but it flat nails it IMO.
<a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-roberts25-2009jun25,0,2015715.story">http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-roberts25-2009jun25,0,2015715.story</a>
<strong>Why California can't be governed
Six key factors, including Prop. 13 and term limits, have brought California to the brink</strong>
<blockquote>Thirty years later, the ghost of Jarvis and his legacy initiative still aim antipathy, scorn and disdain at California's government and its leaders. Proposition 13 was the first, and most far-reaching, in a cascade of political decisions over the last three decades that have shaped the dysfunctional structure of governance in the state.
Simply put, California today is ungovernable.
As state and local officials struggle to weather the state's fiscal crisis, they wield power with the damaged machinery of a patchwork government system that lacks accountability, encourages stalemate and drifts but cannot be steered.
In this system, <em><strong>elected leaders carry responsibility, but not authority, for far-reaching policies about public revenues and resources</strong></em>. That's not governance -- it's reactive management of a deeply flawed status quo.
</blockquote>
I'm not going to cite the whole thing, but it flat nails it IMO.