Bullsback said:Actually, when you don't have competition, it can be bad for you and your prices (maybe not satellite but Uverse). Look at places where Googlefiber is and what the cable companies charge (and let me give you a hint, it isn't near what they charge here). In the case of Greenwood...if your only option is Uverse of Satellite than you have very few options and they could, ultimately opt to charge you different rates.DJW1705 said:Bullsback said:Wow, I am quite surprised Cox isn't already part of Greenwood's tech plans (or at least some cable provider....Comcast, whoever). Seems very disorganized to me that it isn't. I just presumed in any new civilized area (this isn't some rogue project out in the middle of nowhere or no name development, you are talking option of some form of cable company or leveraging DSL or higher speed internet through a Uverse / FIOS type set up.
Plus, I presume Cox already services the rest of the Tustin Legacy / Villages of Colombus Area (unless I'm mistaken) so odd that their infrastructure wouldn't already be in.
Who cares. Cable TV and internet, regardless of provider (Comcast, Cox, etc.), are all terrible and overpriced.
And I have Uverse but Cox's internet is hands down superior. Isn't even a debate.
You get the internet speed that works for you. How can it be hands down superior? We have 24 mbps, and it works just fine for me and is cheaper than Cox for the same speed.