Experts admit global warming predictions wrong

NEW -> Contingent Buyer Assistance Program
morekaos said:
Idiot, more pointless virtue signalling...next time I stay at the Four Seasons I'm bringing an empty bottle to take home the gallon of quality shampoo in my hotel shower....years supply! >:D ;)

California bans hotels from using tiny plastic bottles

SACRAMENTO, Calif. ? Hotels in the nation's most populous state will have to stop giving guests small plastic shampoo bottles under a new law set to take effect starting in 2023.

Gov. Gavin Newsom announced Wednesday he had signed a law banning hotels from giving guests plastic bottles filled with shampoo, conditioner or soap. It takes effect in 2023 for hotels with more than 50 rooms and 2024 for hotels with less than 50 rooms.

Violators could be fined $500 for a first offense and $2,000 for subsequent violations.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/travel/hotels/2019/10/10/california-hotel-bottle-ban-law-prohibits-tiny-plastic-bottles/3928360002/

You know that hotel guests will pee in, or do worse, to the wall mounted bulk shampoo containers.





 
23292bfc04be592c0fde2c67e79c5a4b.jpg


Those that cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.

 
Like today, that was a farce. Today they would accuse Espera de Corti of cultural appropriation and exploitation...

The 'Crying Indian' ad that fooled the environmental movement

The campaign was based on many duplicities. The first of them was that Iron Eyes Cody was actually born Espera de Corti ? an Italian-American who played Indians in both his life and on screen. The commercial?s impact hinged on the emotional authenticity of the Crying Indian?s tear. In promoting this symbol, Keep America Beautiful was trying to piggyback on the counterculture?s embrace of Native American culture as a more authentic identity than commercial culture.

The second duplicity was that Keep America Beautiful was composed of leading beverage and packaging corporations. Not only were they the very essence of what the counterculture was against; they were also staunchly opposed to many environmental initiatives.

https://www.chicagotribune.com/opinion/commentary/ct-perspec-indian-crying-environment-ads-pollution-1123-20171113-story.html
https://youtu.be/8Suu84khNGY

https://youtu.be/8Suu84khNGY
 
Happiness said:
morekaos said:
Idiot, more pointless virtue signalling...next time I stay at the Four Seasons I'm bringing an empty bottle to take home the gallon of quality shampoo in my hotel shower....years supply! >:D ;)

California bans hotels from using tiny plastic bottles

SACRAMENTO, Calif. ? Hotels in the nation's most populous state will have to stop giving guests small plastic shampoo bottles under a new law set to take effect starting in 2023.

Gov. Gavin Newsom announced Wednesday he had signed a law banning hotels from giving guests plastic bottles filled with shampoo, conditioner or soap. It takes effect in 2023 for hotels with more than 50 rooms and 2024 for hotels with less than 50 rooms.

Violators could be fined $500 for a first offense and $2,000 for subsequent violations.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/travel/hotels/2019/10/10/california-hotel-bottle-ban-law-prohibits-tiny-plastic-bottles/3928360002/

You know that hotel guests will pee in, or do worse, to the wall mounted bulk shampoo containers.

that's just extra "all-natural protein"
 
Happiness said:
momopi said:
When I was in Japan, I observed that their toilets have add-on bidets, and the bathroom sink drains to toilet reserve tank for flushing.  The bidet helps to reduce toilet paper use, and the "recycled" sink water used for toilet flushing conserves water.

In Irvine we have a Lotus bidet store, but they're not cheap:https://www.lotusseats.com/

You still need to dry your ass with toilet paper after you spray it with a bidet.


Yes, but you'd use 50%-75% less toilet paper.  Washing with a bidet (or use baby wipes) is also more sanitary.  If you just wipe with dry toilet paper, you're actually smearing the stuff around your skin.
 
momopi said:
Happiness said:
momopi said:
When I was in Japan, I observed that their toilets have add-on bidets, and the bathroom sink drains to toilet reserve tank for flushing.  The bidet helps to reduce toilet paper use, and the "recycled" sink water used for toilet flushing conserves water.

In Irvine we have a Lotus bidet store, but they're not cheap:https://www.lotusseats.com/

You still need to dry your ass with toilet paper after you spray it with a bidet.


Yes, but you'd use 50%-75% less toilet paper.  Washing with a bidet (or use baby wipes) is also more sanitary.  If you just wipe with dry toilet paper, you're actually smearing the stuff around your skin.

just use your hand and wash your hand.  that way you don't have to use any toilet paper.  gotta save the environment!
 
Kings said:
just use your hand and wash your hand.  that way you don't have to use any toilet paper.  gotta save the environment!


In Malaysia they have handheld bidets installed next to the toilet.  You can just use it to hose your bum.  However, the downside is that the floors are often wet even with local hot & dry weather.
 
Kamela Harris: "If you live in the Bay Area, here?s a helpful website for tracking PG&E?s power shut-offs. None of this is acceptable and PG&E must be held accountable for the lack of maintenance of their power lines. For now, please stay safe and exercise caution."
https://www.facebook.com/343657505977389/posts/1053137881696011/


Oh yes, we must all ignore California governments, regulators and politicians like Harris fingerints all over the clusterf*ck that is wildfire risk and energy regulation.  Not to mention this has been the communicated plan for months.
 
nosuchreality said:
Kamela Harris: "If you live in the Bay Area, here?s a helpful website for tracking PG&E?s power shut-offs. None of this is acceptable and PG&E must be held accountable for the lack of maintenance of their power lines. For now, please stay safe and exercise caution."
https://www.facebook.com/343657505977389/posts/1053137881696011/


Oh yes, we must all ignore California governments, regulators and politicians like Harris fingerints all over the clusterf*ck that is wildfire risk and energy regulation.  Not to mention this has been the communicated plan for months.

just more virtue signaling from a failed presidential candidate that can't even poll above 8% in her home state
 
Kings said:
nosuchreality said:
Kamela Harris: "If you live in the Bay Area, here?s a helpful website for tracking PG&E?s power shut-offs. None of this is acceptable and PG&E must be held accountable for the lack of maintenance of their power lines. For now, please stay safe and exercise caution."
https://www.facebook.com/343657505977389/posts/1053137881696011/


Oh yes, we must all ignore California governments, regulators and politicians like Harris fingerints all over the clusterf*ck that is wildfire risk and energy regulation.  Not to mention this has been the communicated plan for months.

just more virtue signaling from a failed presidential candidate that can't even poll above 8% in her home state

It sure looks like her campaign is toast.  Time to go back to dope smokin and Tupac listenin.
 
How about Ronald Reagan?
He claims to be a big Republican. But he slams Reagan.

Like I previously mentioned he?s an opportunist.
 
eyephone said:
How about Ronald Reagan?
He claims to be a big Republican. But he slams Reagan.

Like I previously mentioned he?s an opportunist.

Not really all that green...


Carter shows off his new solar panels at the installation ceremony in 1977.

In 1986 when the price of energy was temporarily cheaper and Americans? minds were less focused on environmental issues, President Reagan ordered the panels removed from the White House roof. Reagan, who didn?t think much of solar energy, also allowed the tax credit Carter had instated to lapse.

Then came ?a clear, calculated campaign by the [Department of Energy] in the years of the Reagan administration to crush the solar energy program of the federal government? according to Denis Hayes, an expert on solar energy who worked for the government at the time. According to another expert involved in Carter?s original solar panel installation, Reagan?s Administration ?felt that the equipment was just a joke? and he had it taken down.?

https://forgottenhistoryblog.com/the-white-house-sported-solar-panels-until-reagan-removed-them-in-1986/
 
So now that Polar bears seem to be so uncooperative by not dying out from global warming , we must change the marketing campaign to distract from reality...Squirrel!!!

Unaffected by climate change, Nunavut polar bears found to exceed ?co-existence threshold'
The plan leans heavily on Inuit knowledge, which yields population estimates higher than those suggested by western science

There are too many polar bears in parts of Nunavut and climate change hasn?t yet affected any of them, says a draft management plan from the territorial government that contradicts much of conventional scientific thinking.

https://nationalpost.com/news/so-many-bears-draft-plan-says-nunavut-polar-bear-numbers-unsafe

Why we're rethinking the images we use for our climate journalism

We know, from years of experience, that people love polar bears and pandas, so it is easy to see how these appealing creatures have become the emblems for the topics of endangered species and what we previously termed as global warming. Often, when signalling environmental stories to our readers, selecting an image of a polar bear on melting ice has been the obvious ? though not necessarily appropriate ? choice. These images tell a certain story about the climate crisis but can seem remote and abstract ? a problem that is not a human one, nor one that is particularly urgent.

So it made sense when we heard that research conducted by the team at Climate Visuals has shown that people respond to human pictures and stories. Images that show emotion and pictures of real situations make the story relevant to the individual. Rather than choosing, say, an image of a smoke stack pumping out pollution or a forest on fire

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/oct/18/guardian-climate-pledge-2019-images-pictures-guidelines
 
Back
Top