Experts admit global warming predictions wrong

[morekaos]

Now this foolishness is taking lives...

Eco madness may be reason for disastrous Boeing 737 MAX safety issues

relentless pressure to reduce emissions appears to have been a significant factor in the disastrous safety failures of the Boeing 737 MAX aircraft, which resulted in two fatal crashes in the past year, claiming 346 lives.

The warning from Boeing?s catastrophes is that climate ideology can have fatal consequences.

The 737 MAX was trumpeted as ?Boeing?s game changer.? It reduced emissions by 14 percent and Boeing raced it into production to compete with a climate-friendly new offering from Airbus.

But in order to achieve its green goal, Boeing had to use much bigger engines that didn?t fit in the usual position under the wing of the repurposed, 53-year-old 737 design.

The engines had to be moved forward and hoisted higher.

As a result, the aerodynamics changed, and the planes had a tendency to pitch up and potentially stall on takeoff. Boeing?s solution to this hardware defect was an imperfect software bandage that would automatically correct the pitch. In both crashes, preliminary investigations found this software kicked in even when the plane wasn?t stalling, with lethal consequences.

https://nypost.com/2019/10/23/devine-eco-madness-may-be-reason-for-disastrous-boeing-737-max-safety-issues/

 

[Liar Loan]

Now this foolishness is taking lives...

Eco madness may be reason for disastrous Boeing 737 MAX safety issues

relentless pressure to reduce emissions appears to have been a significant factor in the disastrous safety failures of the Boeing 737 MAX aircraft, which resulted in two fatal crashes in the past year, claiming 346 lives.

The warning from Boeing?s catastrophes is that climate ideology can have fatal consequences.

The 737 MAX was trumpeted as ?Boeing?s game changer.? It reduced emissions by 14 percent and Boeing raced it into production to compete with a climate-friendly new offering from Airbus.

But in order to achieve its green goal, Boeing had to use much bigger engines that didn?t fit in the usual position under the wing of the repurposed, 53-year-old 737 design.

The engines had to be moved forward and hoisted higher.

As a result, the aerodynamics changed, and the planes had a tendency to pitch up and potentially stall on takeoff. Boeing?s solution to this hardware defect was an imperfect software bandage that would automatically correct the pitch. In both crashes, preliminary investigations found this software kicked in even when the plane wasn?t stalling, with lethal consequences.

https://nypost.com/2019/10/23/devine-eco-madness-may-be-reason-for-disastrous-boeing-737-max-safety-issues/

But at least their virtue was signaled.

 

[eyephone]

How about you ride on the 737? Currently a lot of countries have banned the plane including the US.

Now this foolishness is taking lives...

Eco madness may be reason for disastrous Boeing 737 MAX safety issues

relentless pressure to reduce emissions appears to have been a significant factor in the disastrous safety failures of the Boeing 737 MAX aircraft, which resulted in two fatal crashes in the past year, claiming 346 lives.

The warning from Boeing?s catastrophes is that climate ideology can have fatal consequences.

The 737 MAX was trumpeted as ?Boeing?s game changer.? It reduced emissions by 14 percent and Boeing raced it into production to compete with a climate-friendly new offering from Airbus.

But in order to achieve its green goal, Boeing had to use much bigger engines that didn?t fit in the usual position under the wing of the repurposed, 53-year-old 737 design.

The engines had to be moved forward and hoisted higher.

As a result, the aerodynamics changed, and the planes had a tendency to pitch up and potentially stall on takeoff. Boeing?s solution to this hardware defect was an imperfect software bandage that would automatically correct the pitch. In both crashes, preliminary investigations found this software kicked in even when the plane wasn?t stalling, with lethal consequences.

https://nypost.com/2019/10/23/devine-eco-madness-may-be-reason-for-disastrous-boeing-737-max-safety-issues/

 

[eyephone]

You see what he?s doing. He?s blaming people someone else for 737 problems.

A typical post by Morekas. Don?t fall for it.

Same thing goes about Raegan. He said he?s dead he doesn?t care about him. But when I mentioned his accomplishments. Then he said he loves Raegan. All because it doesn?t fit his agenda. Unbelievable

A total bot

 

[morekaos]

Another "scalp" offered to the god Gaia

SHE WOULD HAVE STOOD A BETTER CHANCE AGAINST POLAR BEARS
Dr. Susan Crockford is one of the world?s leading experts on polar bears. As such, she has repeatedly reported the inconvenient fact that polar bears are thriving, with their populations burgeoning. Why is this fact inconvenient? Because climate change activists have chosen polar bears?considered to be cute by people who don?t have to deal with them?as a propaganda tool.

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/10/she-would-have-stood-a-better-chance-against-polar-bears.php

 

[eyephone]

You see what he?s doing. He?s blaming people someone else for 737 problems.

A typical post by Morekas. Don?t fall for it.

Same thing goes about Raegan. He said he?s dead he doesn?t care about him. But when I mentioned his accomplishments. Then he said he loves Raegan. All because it doesn?t fit his agenda. Unbelievable

A total bot

He can?t dispute my post. So continues to posts with his eyes closed.

It?s like a dog that can?t run anymore. (Kind of feel sorry for this guy)

 

[morekaos]

You see what he?s doing. He?s blaming people someone else for 737 problems.

A typical post by Morekas. Don?t fall for it.

Same thing goes about Raegan. He said he?s dead he doesn?t care about him. But when I mentioned his accomplishments. Then he said he loves Raegan. All because it doesn?t fit his agenda. Unbelievable

A total bot

He can?t dispute my post. So continues to posts with his eyes closed.

It?s like a dog that can?t run anymore. (Kind of feel sorry for this guy)

addressed this awhile ago...keep up

How about Ronald Reagan?
He claims to be a big Republican. But he slams Reagan.

Like I previously mentioned he?s an opportunist.

Not really all that green...

Carter shows off his new solar panels at the installation ceremony in 1977.

In 1986 when the price of energy was temporarily cheaper and Americans? minds were less focused on environmental issues, President Reagan ordered the panels removed from the White House roof. Reagan, who didn?t think much of solar energy, also allowed the tax credit Carter had instated to lapse.

Then came ?a clear, calculated campaign by the [Department of Energy] in the years of the Reagan administration to crush the solar energy program of the federal government? according to Denis Hayes, an expert on solar energy who worked for the government at the time. According to another expert involved in Carter?s original solar panel installation, Reagan?s Administration ?felt that the equipment was just a joke? and he had it taken down.?

https://forgottenhistoryblog.com/the-white-house-sported-solar-panels-until-reagan-removed-them-in-1986/

 

[eyephone]

There?s a rebuttal for that. Look at my previous post about Raegan. Let me find it.

 

[nosuchreality]

Now this foolishness is taking lives...

Eco madness may be reason for disastrous Boeing 737 MAX safety issues

relentless pressure to reduce emissions appears to have been a significant factor in the disastrous safety failures of the Boeing 737 MAX aircraft, which resulted in two fatal crashes in the past year, claiming 346 lives.

The warning from Boeing?s catastrophes is that climate ideology can have fatal consequences.

The 737 MAX was trumpeted as ?Boeing?s game changer.? It reduced emissions by 14 percent and Boeing raced it into production to compete with a climate-friendly new offering from Airbus.

But in order to achieve its green goal, Boeing had to use much bigger engines that didn?t fit in the usual position under the wing of the repurposed, 53-year-old 737 design.

The engines had to be moved forward and hoisted higher.

As a result, the aerodynamics changed, and the planes had a tendency to pitch up and potentially stall on takeoff. Boeing?s solution to this hardware defect was an imperfect software bandage that would automatically correct the pitch. In both crashes, preliminary investigations found this software kicked in even when the plane wasn?t stalling, with lethal consequences.

https://nypost.com/2019/10/23/devine-eco-madness-may-be-reason-for-disastrous-boeing-737-max-safety-issues/

Trite.

Seriously apologist for greed and blind hate for any environmental regulations. The eco-engines aren't about emissions, thats pablum for the masses, they're purely about fuel efficiency because fuel for jets is MFing expensive and volatile.

 

[morekaos]

Make up your mind already...are we burning up or gonna freeze our nuts off?

Earth is facing another ICE AGE: Scientists claim an increase in sea ice could block the release of carbon dioxide from the ocean and cause a global COOLING

Computer simulations show that an increase in sea ice could spark an ice age
Acts as a lid on the ocean, blocking it from releasing carbon dioxide
This would create a reverse greenhouse effect and cool the earth

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-/Explosion-sea-ice-levels-spark-ice-age-time-2-MILLION-years.html

 

[nosuchreality]

Make up your mind already...are we burning up or gonna freeze our nuts off?

Earth is facing another ICE AGE: Scientists claim an increase in sea ice could block the release of carbon dioxide from the ocean and cause a global COOLING

Computer simulations show that an increase in sea ice could spark an ice age
Acts as a lid on the ocean, blocking it from releasing carbon dioxide
This would create a reverse greenhouse effect and cool the earth

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-/Explosion-sea-ice-levels-spark-ice-age-time-2-MILLION-years.html

It helps if you read more than a headline.

 

[morekaos]

Did

 

[morekaos]

Well it used to sound just like communism but now its a Thanos like final solution...

Earth Needs Fewer People to Beat the Climate Crisis, Scientists Say

(Bloomberg) -- Forty years ago, scientists from 50 nations converged on Geneva to discuss what was then called the ?CO2-climate problem.? At the time, with reliance on fossil fuels having helped trigger the 1979 oil crisis, they predicted global warming would eventually become a major environmental challenge.

The scientists got to work, building a strategy on how to attack the problem and laying the groundwork for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the world?s preeminent body of climate scientists. Their goal was to get ahead of the problem before it was too late. But after a fast start, the fossil fuel industry, politics and the prioritization of economic growth over planetary health slowed them down.

Now, four decades later, a larger group of scientists is sounding another, much more urgent alarm. More than 11,000 experts from around the world are calling for a critical addition to the main strategy of dumping fossil fuels for renewable energy: there needs to be far fewer humans on the planet.

https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/population-control-critical-part-climate-150004993.html
https://youtu.be/dFomwoVngOI

https://youtu.be/dFomwoVngOI

 

[Liar Loan]

Thunberg?s Epic Fail: Yacht Captain Flies To The Rescue From Britain To Virginia

The teenage guru of environmental alarmists around the world does not fly due to the carbon emissions produced by air travel. Instead of flying to Madrid, Spain to attend the 2019 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP 25), Greta Thunberg is crossing the Atlantic in a catamaran. Her adventure of crossing the ocean from Virginia to Portugal spotlights one glaring fact, though. The yacht captain who volunteered to sail the teen on her journey flew from England to Virginia, thus canceling out any savings of carbon emissions Thunberg may have managed.

https://hotair.com/archives/karen-t...-yacht-captain-flies-rescue-britain-virginia/

 

[morekaos]

#winning!!

Exxon wins first climate change lawsuit against a major oil company as judge rules they did not mislead investors

The New York attorney general had accused the Texas-based company of using two sets of books to hide the true cost of climate change from investors
Exxon said the two sets of figures used to calculate dollars per ton of carbon emissions served different purposes - evaluating global demand and planning for specific capital projects
The case, filed in October 2018, was the first of several climate change lawsuits against major oil companies to go to trial
Justice Ostrager said that the state had failed to prove investors were misled
The Union of Concerned Scientists argued that the ruling won't thwart overall efforts to hold oil and gas companies to account for climate harms

[url]https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7776993/Judge-rules-Exxon-Mobil-suit-climate-regulations.html[/url]

 

[Liar Loan]

 

[morekaos]

Think he's on to something ....

(CNN)Brazil's president has called Swedish climate change activist Greta Thunberg a "brat" after she condemned violence against indigenous people who were killed in the Amazon.

"Greta has said that the Indians died because because they were defending the Amazon. It's amazing that the press gives space to this kind of pirralha," Jair Bolsonaro told reporters in Brasilia.
Pirralha is a derogatory Portuguese word meaning "brat."

https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/11/americas/bolsonaro-thunberg-brat-intl-scli/index.html

 

[morekaos]

I'm going out for steaks tonight, ordering two, eating one, stuffing the other full or straws and throwing it in the ocean... ;D >

Families that eat out at restaurants and consume large amounts of sweets and alcohol are likely to have a higher carbon footprint than MEAT eaters, study claims
Experts studied the carbon footprints of around 60,000 Japanese households
Many families in Japan have gone vegan to reduce their carbon emissions
However, meat was found less impactful than eating out, sweets and alcohol
The findings highlight the dietary changes needed to combat climate change

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-7814169/Dining-buying-lots-sweets-alcohol-gives-higher-carbon-footprints-MEAT-eating.html

 

[eyephone]

But you don?t live in the US so how do you know?
He trolls like no others.

 

[morekaos]

We have steak in Moscow too!