irvinehomeowner said:Devil's advocate:
You also need to take into account scale, geography and infrastructure.
Italy, for example, is roughly the same size as California... but they have over 60m population while we have less than 40m.
The Vox article credits China for being able to build temporary hospitals but we can use current infrastructure as hospitals... stadiums, gyms, etc (all of which are not being used due to sports being cancelled).
But this is also why social distancing and flattening the curve is important... even if you are not worried about yourself (ahem morekaos), everything helps to prevent overloading our healthcare system.
This "simulator" helps illustrate the theory:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2020/world/corona-simulator/
We have neither the capacity like China to build temp hospitals nor the surplus of healthcare workers to handle the increase. China can force all their health workers to work around the clock, use interns and trainee to staff up, and even summon retired healthcare workers to fill in.
We live in a free country so this will not happen on a massive scale. Our healthcare system is already running close to full capacity prior to Covid-19. People often don?t think about the downside of a capitalistic healthcare system.
I don?t even think US as a country is capable of a true lockdown, enforcing marshal law. The only realistic thing Americans can achieve is social distancing. But look around your local places or just on TI. There are plenty of people complaining or even fighting it.
People who think they?re invincible to the coronavirus should know that even if they don?t care about the sick or the elderly or their own grandparents, if they get into an accident and the hospital is full, which is more likely in a mass panic, they?ll die on the streets like everyone else.