morekaos said:
daedalus said:
morekaos said:
No, I posed that with that many dead many of us should all know someone (first hand) who has died. (excluding healthcare workers).
It's 1 in 1000. Do you really know that many people, "first hand"? I don't. Not even close. I do have a friend I've known for 20 years--someone in my small happy hour group--who got sick. She was in the hospital a few times for a number of days, missed >12 weeks of work and suffered immensely. I imagine a marginal difference in her condition could have resulted in a worse outcome.
The numbers add up just fine. There's no conspiracy here.
Yes, when I mean first hand I mean I know their name address and phone numbers. I don?t see shame in having it already. Most I know are almost proud of having survived. 40+ and not one hospitalization and no deaths. That number is national, at least 6 states. I still find it curious.
Depends on the testing factor. If they're tested from having symptoms, I'd find 40 with no hospitalizations rare, but not necessarily problematic. it's really depends on the distribution of the people being tested, if they're predominantly under 60 and typical health issues, no hospitalizations out of 40 wouldn't be uncommon.
If they're part of a screening process from employment getting screen with no symptoms, then no hospitalizations is probably expected.