acpme_IHB
New member
reason,
what i meant was that it doesnt seem logical for one particular unit or type of unit to not have any depreciation while similar type of housing around it has. of course theres differences between the units, but from a birds eye perspective, the garland-treo-cortile area represents a general class of housing -- entry level townhomes and condos. and we've seen prices drop so it just didnt seem intuitive to me that house X, a 1500 sq ft townhome, is going to have drastically diff comps than house Y, 1600 sq ft duplex, and house Z, 1400 sq ft detached condo, etc.
my comments are just based on perception though from what i've seen, not based on any particular analysis. but perhaps actual comps might say otherwise. interesting information certainly though...
what i meant was that it doesnt seem logical for one particular unit or type of unit to not have any depreciation while similar type of housing around it has. of course theres differences between the units, but from a birds eye perspective, the garland-treo-cortile area represents a general class of housing -- entry level townhomes and condos. and we've seen prices drop so it just didnt seem intuitive to me that house X, a 1500 sq ft townhome, is going to have drastically diff comps than house Y, 1600 sq ft duplex, and house Z, 1400 sq ft detached condo, etc.
my comments are just based on perception though from what i've seen, not based on any particular analysis. but perhaps actual comps might say otherwise. interesting information certainly though...