Toyota moving to Texas

NEW -> Contingent Buyer Assistance Program
eyephone said:
morekaos said:
Hewlett-Packard does more revenue than all those companies.

Again, bye bye HP. No one is crying on TI.

You may not cry but the state coffers sure are. You can't just up and replace that kind of tax revenue.  It would take 10 In-N-Outs just to plug the hole HP just blew in the state budget...dollars and cents, Eye...Dollars and sense
 
morekaos said:
eyephone said:
morekaos said:
Hewlett-Packard does more revenue than all those companies.

Again, bye bye HP. No one is crying on TI.

You may not cry but the state coffers sure are. You can't just up and replace that kind of tax revenue.  It would take 10 In-N-Outs just to plug the hole HP just blew in the state budget...dollars and cents, Eye...Dollars and sense

I have no affiliation with in n out. But many love the burgers!

People are fighting at new location in Colorado. (so popular)https://youtu.be/-NlLnDU_g2A

When is the last time someone fought over an HP printer? (maybe like 10 plus years or never?)
 
Doesn't matter Eye.  How good their food is not the issue here. In-N-out is lucky if it does a Billion in revenue.  HP DOES over $7 billion in revenue.  You cannot compare the two. Any fool would prefer to tax 7 billion over 1.  Truth is Planatir just also moved out of Cali and took that Billion in revenue with it too.  The bucket has so many holes you just can't plug them all....need a new bucket.

Why Palantir co-founder Joe Lonsdale is leaving Silicon Valley

Joe Lonsdale is moving the headquarters of 8VC, his venture firm, from San Francisco to Austin, Texas.
Palantir, the software company he co-founded in 2003, said in August that it was leaving Silicon Valley for Denver.
Lonsdale acknowledged that California?s high tax rate was one of the reasons he considered the move to Texas, which has no state income tax.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/06/palantir-co-founder-joe-lonsdale-leaving-silicon-valley.html
 
morekaos said:
EBITDA $4,200,000,000.00

And of that, what is taxable? Or does HP pull an Amazon and pays very little taxes? Context needed.

I think I found it... your numbers are off, $7.2B is just 4th quarter expected revenue, annual is $56.4B.

But... pretax annual income is $3.23B and in previous years, it looks like their tax was negative so not sure what that means.
https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/HPQ/financials

You're just like a tabloid man... a purple fonted one.
 
eyephone said:
Previously in the news they did offshore tax havens. Allegedly idk
So maybe it does not matter.

You think that is bad Eye?  Look at the restaurant biz...Chipotle does around $6 billion in revenue but has an EBITDA of around $500 million.  Restaurants write off tons of plant equipment and depreciation.  Not really good tax payers so your examples , although well known, don't really pay a  lot of taxes anyway.  These Big companies that are leaving (Toyota, Chevron, Hewlett and now maybe Tesla) pay tons in taxes,  They are not easily replaced by start ups and venture cap firms.  Cali has real built in problems right now that are not addressed by the current regime, in fact they only are making it worse.
 
irvinehomeowner said:
morekaos said:
EBITDA $4,200,000,000.00

And of that, what is taxable? Or does HP pull an Amazon and pays very little taxes? Context needed.

I think I found it... your numbers are off, $7.2B is just 4th quarter expected revenue, annual is $56.4B.

But... pretax annual income is $3.23B and in previous years, it looks like their tax was negative so not sure what that means.
https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/HPQ/financials

You're just like a tabloid man... a purple fonted one.

Type offshore and the company name. Idk
 
morekaos said:
eyephone said:
Previously in the news they did offshore tax havens. Allegedly idk
So maybe it does not matter.

You think that is bad Eye?  Look at the restaurant biz...Chipotle does around $6 billion in revenue but has an EBITDA of around $500 million.  Restaurants write off tons of plant equipment and depreciation.  Not really good tax payers so your examples , although well known, don't really pay a  lot of taxes anyway.  These Big companies that are leaving (Toyota, Chevron, Hewlett and now maybe Tesla) pay tons in taxes,  They are not easily replaced by start ups and venture cap firms.  Cali has real built in problems right now that are not addressed by the current regime, in fact they only are making it worse.

We are not talking about p&l. We are taking like paying no taxes at all.
 
One thing the headlines don?t discuss because it isn?t a good headline is that taxable income gets apportioned to different states/countries so while a company is headquartered here in CA they probably are not paying taxes on all of the taxable income in CA. It may be a much lower % of taxable income (google, etc).  Also the the GAAP pretax income which is what companies report in their financials can be significantly different than taxable income for the purpose of the companies tax returns.

With that said, these companies leaving CA is not a good thing. California just happens to have a lot of them that when each one leaves it?s not felt as much. But eventually it will add up if they are not replaced. Putting aside the taxable income in CA these companies still generate a lot of economic activity aside from just taxes so in general it?s not good that they are leaving
 
I think the chipotle turnaround was more that they hired the Taco Bell ceo. He moved the company back from Denver to Newport. I?m guessing if they stayed out in Denver the results would have been the same.
 
...additionally these companies employ hundreds of thousands in our state.  Those people and jobs pay income taxes.  When they leave they take those jobs and all that revenue with them.  Its not just Bye Buy Hewlett or Chevron...its Bye Bye employees and all the peripheral business they genterate.!
 
qwerty said:
I think the chipotle turnaround was more that they hired the Taco Bell ceo. He moved the company back from Denver to Newport. I?m guessing if they stayed out in Denver the results would have been the same.

Always pushing Taco Bell. You are like Panda. :)
 
qwerty said:
With that said, these companies leaving CA is not a good thing. California just happens to have a lot of them that when each one leaves it?s not felt as much. But eventually it will add up if they are not replaced. Putting aside the taxable income in CA these companies still generate a lot of economic activity aside from just taxes so in general it?s not good that they are leaving

Nature abhors a vacuum.

Seems like there is always companies that step up and replaces what leaves.

My kids are waiting for something to replace Souplantation. :)
 
irvinehomeowner said:
qwerty said:
I think the chipotle turnaround was more that they hired the Taco Bell ceo. He moved the company back from Denver to Newport. I?m guessing if they stayed out in Denver the results would have been the same.

Always pushing Taco Bell. You are like Panda. :)

That?s because what you guys don?t know is that I?m a food influencer on the side and every time I write the words ?Taco Bell? on the internet a $100 gets direct deposited into my account :-)
 
Did Toyota do better moving to Texas?
I assume financially yes

If I remember when they left they were considered #1 car company. Are they the #1 car company now? Some people would say NO.

It is all about Talent.

But I guess if there is any finger pointing. It is at the parent company in Japan. The American subsidiary just moved to Texas.
 
Back
Top