morekaos
Well-known member
eyephone said:Hold up how do you know HP does more revenue than In-N-Out. In n out is private.
$7,200,000,000.00 is a lot of hamburgers...too many for even In N Out.
eyephone said:Hold up how do you know HP does more revenue than In-N-Out. In n out is private.
eyephone said:morekaos said:Hewlett-Packard does more revenue than all those companies.
Again, bye bye HP. No one is crying on TI.
morekaos said:eyephone said:morekaos said:Hewlett-Packard does more revenue than all those companies.
Again, bye bye HP. No one is crying on TI.
You may not cry but the state coffers sure are. You can't just up and replace that kind of tax revenue. It would take 10 In-N-Outs just to plug the hole HP just blew in the state budget...dollars and cents, Eye...Dollars and sense
morekaos said:EBITDA $4,200,000,000.00
eyephone said:Previously in the news they did offshore tax havens. Allegedly idk
So maybe it does not matter.
irvinehomeowner said:morekaos said:EBITDA $4,200,000,000.00
And of that, what is taxable? Or does HP pull an Amazon and pays very little taxes? Context needed.
I think I found it... your numbers are off, $7.2B is just 4th quarter expected revenue, annual is $56.4B.
But... pretax annual income is $3.23B and in previous years, it looks like their tax was negative so not sure what that means.
https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/HPQ/financials
You're just like a tabloid man... a purple fonted one.
morekaos said:eyephone said:Previously in the news they did offshore tax havens. Allegedly idk
So maybe it does not matter.
You think that is bad Eye? Look at the restaurant biz...Chipotle does around $6 billion in revenue but has an EBITDA of around $500 million. Restaurants write off tons of plant equipment and depreciation. Not really good tax payers so your examples , although well known, don't really pay a lot of taxes anyway. These Big companies that are leaving (Toyota, Chevron, Hewlett and now maybe Tesla) pay tons in taxes, They are not easily replaced by start ups and venture cap firms. Cali has real built in problems right now that are not addressed by the current regime, in fact they only are making it worse.
qwerty said:I think the chipotle turnaround was more that they hired the Taco Bell ceo. He moved the company back from Denver to Newport. I?m guessing if they stayed out in Denver the results would have been the same.
qwerty said:With that said, these companies leaving CA is not a good thing. California just happens to have a lot of them that when each one leaves it?s not felt as much. But eventually it will add up if they are not replaced. Putting aside the taxable income in CA these companies still generate a lot of economic activity aside from just taxes so in general it?s not good that they are leaving
irvinehomeowner said:qwerty said:I think the chipotle turnaround was more that they hired the Taco Bell ceo. He moved the company back from Denver to Newport. I?m guessing if they stayed out in Denver the results would have been the same.
Always pushing Taco Bell. You are like Panda.
irvinehomeowner said:Elon moved to Texas.
morekaos got a double.