gladiacmx said:
irvinehomeshopper said:
This is the biggest problem when you don't own that access to your garage in a detached condo. That piece of land where the the cars were parked belongs to a fractional interest of each homeowner and everyone has the right to file a complaint or entitled to have both cars towed. Rule of thumb is always buy a home where you own your land contiguous to the public street and abuts to the back of sidewalk. I posted this in another thread but no one seems to understand the implication until this thread. There are many more implications other than parking issues.
It really sucks to have to pay that much money for a nice home like that but get a shared motorcourt and then have to deal with this problem forever. Then you have to deal with it more each time the neighbors sell the house and a new neighbor moves in.
It is actually a good thing that they may be fully mandarin-speaking people. The thing about mandarin people is that we actually get scared if we get legal docs, demands, notice of etc.etc. in the mail. So honestly, I would have the HOA write them a letter of demand or legal action.
With an X budget, I would rather choose motorcourt over a zero lot any day. Home shopping in Irvine I saw waaaay too many zero lot homes. I have no interest in confronting a neighbor over who has access to a piece of MY house.
At least with a motorcourt the association will step in to handle disputes, especially when it's a common shared drive way. When it's a zero lot home, it's
not the association's problem, it's yours.