No... I live in Irvine... no one wants to know you here... especially if you carry a big bat and walk a dog.Panda said:You are probably way ahead of the game in this area than me as I moved here without knowing a soul.
That's okay... I don't mind losing... and I'll always be 1-0 over you.IndieDev said:So far this is a wipe out.
irvinehomeowner said:That's okay... I don't mind losing... and I'll always be 1-0 over you.IndieDev said:So far this is a wipe out.
So... all you guys now think that Panda's "Occupy Johns Creek" movement is a good plan?
That's similar to the kind of luck that I had in terms getting a CIF Football Champ ring....MD won the CIF title in my Sophmore year and then the year after I graduated. We lost in the finals to Rialto in my senior year (we got crushed...45-3 if I remember right).qwerty said:IHO - i joined a company a couple of months after it was bought out, then i joined another company right after an ipo, talk about bad timing.
Good luck on your buyout/IPO and i hope you have better luck than i have.
qwerty said:irvinehomeowner said:That's okay... I don't mind losing... and I'll always be 1-0 over you.IndieDev said:So far this is a wipe out.
So... all you guys now think that Panda's "Occupy Johns Creek" movement is a good plan?
IHO - you should have dropped the too short song: "like 10 to 9, 3 to 2, ill always be one up on you" that has a much better flow than "ill always be 1-0 over you"
irvinehomeowner said:No... I live in Irvine... no one wants to know you here... especially if you carry a big bat and walk a dog.Panda said:You are probably way ahead of the game in this area than me as I moved here without knowing a soul.
Getting back to the topic of the thread... I think any real estate endeavor in this climate is risky and while I understand what you're shooting for, you should NOT use Irvine as an example of why it will work. Irvine is an anomaly... it's a unicorn... fundamentally, prices should not be where they are (yes that's right Indie), so you should be looking at worst case scenarios instead of Irvine case scenarios.
I think there are too many unknowns in JC... I criticize IR for investing in LV and that's more of a known area. But, if you can make it work... good luck... are you still in gold?
Only to you. :-*IndieDev said:The way IHO delivered it almost sounded like a jaded lover.
akim997 said:first... 30 year treasury isn't the risk free rate... 90day T-bill is standard... but you might as well use 0% for now (and the near future)... a lot of CMAs (capital market assumptions) have been adjusted to reflect this.
second... Tbills are not bonds. They are zero's that are 1yr or less.
I work and talk to people from Coke. Even people from the area will agree that the aTl /JC /GA will likely NEVER experience the same type of growth (and RE appreciation) that SoCAL did (or Irvine from 1960's to today)... I agree with IHO in that it's a bit ridiculous to even speculate like that.
I've helped my family who has lived off RE investing for decades (since my dad passed) and I think it's a pretty difficult venture... Personally, I don't see the risk/return proposition... I feel I can make more money at work, with less at risk (no capital investment, just human capital - my time)... Managing RE - it's tedious.. if it were rewarding enough, it could be a full time job (it's my mom's and she's over 70!)... I'm trying to get my mom out of the business for her sake - dealing with tenants, repairs, etc. can be quite a lot of work (at least in a 9 unit apartment) - there is ALWAYS something going on. If what people are saying is true and that 9 houses is more difficult than a 9 -unit you should be prepared for the worst. I will agree with what they say that the multi unit is such that the vacancies and non-performers are mitigated by paying tenants (diversification). Over past 2 years there has been a delinquent or vacant apartment at least every other month. I realized that RE is capital intensive, and its easier if you have a lot of money (we don't have a lot of free capital).
akim997 said:first... 30 year treasury isn't the risk free rate... 90day T-bill is standard... but you might as well use 0% for now (and the near future)... a lot of CMAs (capital market assumptions) have been adjusted to reflect this.
second... Tbills are not bonds. They are zero's that are 1yr or less.
Panda said:I asked the Lord that i would not take these people to eviction court, and he faithfully answered my prayers.
SoCal78 said:Panda said:I asked the Lord that i would not take these people to eviction court, and he faithfully answered my prayers.
Don't leave me hanging. What happened?? They suddenly paid up? Moved out? Also... when they were avoiding payment / dishing out sob stories, it wasn't during the time of the flood, was it? I can't remember if the house was occupied by renters yet or not. If it was during The Great Flood that's kind of a different story.
Panda said:SoCal... when you trust in the Lord.... everything just seems to work out in the end.
qwerty said:akim997 said:first... 30 year treasury isn't the risk free rate... 90day T-bill is standard... but you might as well use 0% for now (and the near future)... a lot of CMAs (capital market assumptions) have been adjusted to reflect this.
second... Tbills are not bonds. They are zero's that are 1yr or less.
man, what are you a CFA, getting all technical and all. yes, technically you are correct on your definitions of risk free rate and tbill. from a practical perspective though, the "risk free rate" on say a 10 year investment would be the rate on a US treasury debt security (or what would you call it, a note). just like when we value our company's stock options and we need to input the interest rate, into the black scholes mode, we use the equivalent "risk free rate" that matches the life of the option.