IHS3000
New member
A few days ago, I obtained these updated price sheets for Carlisle (models for sale now) and Obsidian.
Kings said:Are those price sheets for real? No wonder there are so many GP homes coming up for sale so quickly. That's almost $200k appreciation (30%) in 1 year for Residence 1 and $400k (50%) for Residence 4. Granted, they're models selling now, but still.
IHS3000 said:Kings said:Are those price sheets for real? No wonder there are so many GP homes coming up for sale so quickly. That's almost $200k appreciation (30%) in 1 year for Residence 1 and $400k (50%) for Residence 4. Granted, they're models selling now, but still.
I was wondering the same thing about the significant price differences when comparing the Carlisle?s initial phases and the model prices. The builders do seem to aim for the moon when they price these models and then let the market sort it out.
In earlier posts of this thread and other threads, Irvinehomeshopper (architect of Carlisle) stated Carlisle was ?priced below comp? and ?choice bet for it's best value? and ?right horse to bet on? like Trellis Court and Ellwood.
Hopefully, we see more future products initially priced below comp!
IHB posted Carlisle?s initial prices in their review back in February 2017:
http://www.irvinehousingblog.com/2017/02/16/parasol-park-carlisle-collection-review/
?Prices start from $684,900 for Residence 1; $735,900 for Residence 3 ($801,900 with optional third floor); $749,900 for Residence 4 ($818,900 with optional third floor)?
Compare it to the present Carlisle?s model prices on the builder site:
https://www.tripointehomes.com/southern-california/carlisle-at-parasol-park/
For more comparison, I also attached Lennar?s Lanterns -initial price sheet from December 2016 and one of their final model sheets from October 2017 (Lanterns was the second Parasol Park community to sell out after Somerset).
newPParker said:IHS3000 said:Kings said:Are those price sheets for real? No wonder there are so many GP homes coming up for sale so quickly. That's almost $200k appreciation (30%) in 1 year for Residence 1 and $400k (50%) for Residence 4. Granted, they're models selling now, but still.
I was wondering the same thing about the significant price differences when comparing the Carlisle?s initial phases and the model prices. The builders do seem to aim for the moon when they price these models and then let the market sort it out.
In earlier posts of this thread and other threads, Irvinehomeshopper (architect of Carlisle) stated Carlisle was ?priced below comp? and ?choice bet for it's best value? and ?right horse to bet on? like Trellis Court and Ellwood.
Hopefully, we see more future products initially priced below comp!
IHB posted Carlisle?s initial prices in their review back in February 2017:
http://www.irvinehousingblog.com/2017/02/16/parasol-park-carlisle-collection-review/
?Prices start from $684,900 for Residence 1; $735,900 for Residence 3 ($801,900 with optional third floor); $749,900 for Residence 4 ($818,900 with optional third floor)?
Compare it to the present Carlisle?s model prices on the builder site:
https://www.tripointehomes.com/southern-california/carlisle-at-parasol-park/
For more comparison, I also attached Lennar?s Lanterns -initial price sheet from December 2016 and one of their final model sheets from October 2017 (Lanterns was the second Parasol Park community to sell out after Somerset).
having to pay property tax on all those upgrades built into home price - year after year - doesn't make sense to me but I am a person on budget, and I am sure there are people with throw away hail mary money that is not constrained by these thoughts.
IHS3000 said:Me too! I?d like to choose my own upgrades (not gray) and not pay taxes on them for decades. This stuff adds up. I think the furniture is included in the Carlisle models, too.
Burn That Belly said:$1M bucks for 4bedroom 2744 sqft attached is a damn good deal still. No complaining is warranted. Because over at Eastwood, $1M attached 4bed only gets you 1918sqft.
Burn That Belly said:Cares said:Burn That Belly said:$1M bucks for 4bedroom 2744 sqft attached is a damn good deal still. No complaining is warranted. Because over at Eastwood, $1M attached 4bed only gets you 1918sqft.
While I'm new to Irvine real estate, it's just crazy to me that an attached is so high when compared to a detached. What do you estimate 2744 sqft on a detached in Irvine would be? $2M? In other areas, Santa Monica, beach cities, etc., a detached fetches upwards of 3-5x the attached price.
So to me, it seems quite overpriced but like I said I'm new to the market.
What city are you originally from?
Irvine is expensive known for its:
-Masterfully planned communities
-Overachieving high-scoring Asian children making high schools ranked top-tier in the nation
-Huge influx of foreign cash buyers pouring money into homes for vacation home, empty investment home, or for their parachute kids, which results in further driving up prices
-#2 safest city in California
-median household income of $90k compared to Los Angeles' $55k
-UCI
So when you put that formula all together, it's easy to see why prices are high as it is.