That upstairs loft in the plan 2 was gigantic. I think you could either make it a master retreat or a bedroom with full bath. My wife loved the upstairs of the plan 2. But downstairs was meh. Reminded me of the Layfayette's where the actual family room is just way too small (at least for my taste). That said, I clearly don't have the same test as others since those homes have sold like crazy (might have just as much to do with fact that in general they have nice lots for Irvine and the price point is basically the lowest SFR outside of Cypress Village). But I went again after Palo Alto and still felt the same thing...the family rooms in all of those houses are so small (and that plan 3, without the bar just has so much wasted space in that family room).AW said:What's interesting about plan 2 is the upstairs loft can be part of the master, that's like half of the upstairs, lol
I don't expect a burst but I actually think we are at the peak, but not vs. what we saw last time (in terms of a long-term 20-30% reduction...albeit the trough didn't last long in Irvine). I think we are in for a couple year window of no appreciation to slight downward appreciation. More and more listings seem to be stalling and a lot more price reductions. To USC's points (and he is clearly closer to the market then this layman), if you price it fair, it will sell and sell quick, but I think the definition is "fair" price. A lot of stuff sold at prices which weren't "fair" market price but got the right person and a lot of homes currently on the market have an inflated price tag (which is evident by what I've seen as an uptick in "price reductions"). You are also seeing a lot of the Irvine home tracks stall a bit as well and people can get new construction without significant wait lists (with some exceptions). No longer is the mentality (and this is from speaking to multiple reps at various builders in Irvine) of the buyer...sign me up, I'll take it, the focus is becoming more on location (and by this I mean other then being in "Irvine")...but lot size, cul de sac location...etc. Obviously its always been important but back in 11, 12, and 13, rare to be able to pick location...you were just lucky to get a new construction build...now the good lots go and go quick but more tracks have stuff stall if it isn't that "unique" lot.AW said:Same here, layouts are decent, just not right on certain aspects.
Hoping that bp will surprise us in person as we've already seen the floor plans, but what's the point, all the nice lots will have an up charge and be sold to cash buyers...
When is this dang housing bubble gonna burst, lol
aquabliss said:ps9 said:I need to see these mountainous backyard slopes you speak of....slip and slidable? Or suicidal?
Wellll now I'm not to sure if those slopey lots are even for Palo Alto. When thelandofnoland posted the early on site map, you could see (what we thought were) Palo Alto lots right up against Portola (up Woodhill), but now looking at Goriots sitemap, those lots are not Palo Alto as it seems they're developing only up to Hearst.
To answer your question though from what I saw, they're not suicidal but they were a lot taller than I thought and definitely not useable space whatsoever. I didn't drive over there so just saw them from afar.
aquabliss said:Here's a pic of the Plan 3 great room... nearly perfect layout IMO.
AW said:I know. I don't like the idea of a larger kitchen than living room, bathroom rivaling bedroom size. Some people don't even cook.
Bathroom takes more effort to clean.
Fail.
AW said:I know. I don't like the idea of a larger kitchen than living room, bathroom rivaling bedroom size. Some people don't even cook.
Bathroom takes more effort to clean.
Fail.
AW said:The schools were an issue for us at strada.
Stonegate school proximity isn't too bad until high school.
Bp has the plume issue.
Nothing's perfect.
But back on point to Palo Alto, the sales person did say the back area will all be Palo Alto eventually