irvinehomeowner
Well-known member
So we went back and did this comparison yesterday... and while we like the quietness of the location and the large rooms of Maricopa, the functionality of that upstairs living space in LV Plan 3 is the tipping point.
I don't understand why they didn't utilize more 2nd floor space in Maricopa like they are doing in Cortona at Laguna Altura. And I found it interesting that while the Maricopa master bedrooms are bigger, the baths and closets aren't that much bigger than LV's.
Location aside, it's very hard to spend $200k more for Maricopa over LV because it doesn't give you very much more in functionality. This is where iPac/TIC messed up in that in addition to the location premium, they should also have other things considering how much more they are charging... or they should be a bit lower than where Sonoma was at because Sonoma has the Woodbury location premium (arguably) over Stonegate.
Seems like the Maricopa sales team are a bit more desperate than I remember... although they are going to Phase 3 soon, there is still quite bit of unsold inventory in the current phases.
I don't understand why they didn't utilize more 2nd floor space in Maricopa like they are doing in Cortona at Laguna Altura. And I found it interesting that while the Maricopa master bedrooms are bigger, the baths and closets aren't that much bigger than LV's.
Location aside, it's very hard to spend $200k more for Maricopa over LV because it doesn't give you very much more in functionality. This is where iPac/TIC messed up in that in addition to the location premium, they should also have other things considering how much more they are charging... or they should be a bit lower than where Sonoma was at because Sonoma has the Woodbury location premium (arguably) over Stonegate.
Seems like the Maricopa sales team are a bit more desperate than I remember... although they are going to Phase 3 soon, there is still quite bit of unsold inventory in the current phases.