irvinehomeowner
Well-known member
Rumor is 3 way trade to get Kawhi sending away Lonzo and Ingram.
I?ll miss Ingram but he is not Kawhi level right now.
I?ll miss Ingram but he is not Kawhi level right now.
irvinehomeowner said:Rumor is 3 way trade to get Kawhi sending away Lonzo and Ingram.
I?ll miss Ingram but he is not Kawhi level right now.
Kings said:Mety said:This guy must follow MAX ROI.
will our homes appreciate faster now that the lakers are good again?
qwerty said:I don?t know why everyone thinks the warriors are unbeatable. The thunder had them down 3-1 and choked, the spurs were up on them by 20 in game 1 and Kawhi got hurt, they gave up a 3-1 lead to the Cavs and this year the rockets had them down 3-2 and Chris Paul got hurt.
So they have been pretty lucky. Definitely not unbeatable. Kawhi and lebron would make a formidable opponent, not saying they will beat the warriors but they have a decent shot. The Celtics are probably the team that can knock them off this year.
qwerty said:Irvinecommuter said:As a 30+ year Warriors fan...I can only laugh.
It will be interesting. He is going to be in a contract year. The warriors success comes from moving the ball and if he wants to put up big numbers it could take away from their chemistry. Hopefully he goes all knucklehead and ruins their chemistry
irvinehomeowner said:Rumor is 3 way trade to get Kawhi sending away Lonzo and Ingram.
I?ll miss Ingram but he is not Kawhi level right now.
qwerty said:I don?t know why everyone thinks the warriors are unbeatable. The thunder had them down 3-1 and choked, the spurs were up on them by 20 in game 1 and Kawhi got hurt, they gave up a 3-1 lead to the Cavs and this year the rockets had them down 3-2 and Chris Paul got hurt.
So they have been pretty lucky. Definitely not unbeatable. Kawhi and lebron would make a formidable opponent, not saying they will beat the warriors but they have a decent shot. The Celtics are probably the team that can knock them off this year.
Irvinecommuter said:irvinehomeowner said:Rumor is 3 way trade to get Kawhi sending away Lonzo and Ingram.
I?ll miss Ingram but he is not Kawhi level right now.
Why would SA do that? If they wanted to trade with Lakers...they could do that now.
Irvinecommuter said:qwerty said:Irvinecommuter said:As a 30+ year Warriors fan...I can only laugh.
It will be interesting. He is going to be in a contract year. The warriors success comes from moving the ball and if he wants to put up big numbers it could take away from their chemistry. Hopefully he goes all knucklehead and ruins their chemistry
If all people have left is "chemistry"...then it's over. Javale McGee wasn't exactly a boy scout. Nor was Nick Young.
qwerty said:Irvinecommuter said:qwerty said:Irvinecommuter said:As a 30+ year Warriors fan...I can only laugh.
It will be interesting. He is going to be in a contract year. The warriors success comes from moving the ball and if he wants to put up big numbers it could take away from their chemistry. Hopefully he goes all knucklehead and ruins their chemistry
If all people have left is "chemistry"...then it's over. Javale McGee wasn't exactly a boy scout. Nor was Nick Young.
That?s not all people have left. Like I said before, the Cavs with a horrible team gave the warriors a fight through 3 quarters (though I think one game was a blowout from start to finish). The lakers have better talent than Cleveland. If the lakers get Kawhi they will be the challengers to GS, without Kawhi GS will beat the lakers. The rockets are done. Harden is a choker. Chris Paul is good not good enough.
At some point you get diminishing returns, only one ball. Draymond doesn?t mind being number 4 because he has never been a number one, not even a number 2. boogie thinks he is just as good as any warrior and won?t be happy scoring 10 points a game because that means no max contract the next year.
aquabliss said:Kings said:Mety said:This guy must follow MAX ROI.
will our homes appreciate faster now that the lakers are good again?
Quick, buy this:https://www.redfin.com/CA/Panorama-City/8018-Katherine-Ave-91402/home/4377119
aquabliss said:Kings said:Mety said:This guy must follow MAX ROI.
will our homes appreciate faster now that the lakers are good again?
Quick, buy this:https://www.redfin.com/CA/Panorama-City/8018-Katherine-Ave-91402/home/4377119
Irvinecommuter said:qwerty said:Irvinecommuter said:qwerty said:Irvinecommuter said:As a 30+ year Warriors fan...I can only laugh.
It will be interesting. He is going to be in a contract year. The warriors success comes from moving the ball and if he wants to put up big numbers it could take away from their chemistry. Hopefully he goes all knucklehead and ruins their chemistry
If all people have left is "chemistry"...then it's over. Javale McGee wasn't exactly a boy scout. Nor was Nick Young.
That?s not all people have left. Like I said before, the Cavs with a horrible team gave the warriors a fight through 3 quarters (though I think one game was a blowout from start to finish). The lakers have better talent than Cleveland. If the lakers get Kawhi they will be the challengers to GS, without Kawhi GS will beat the lakers. The rockets are done. Harden is a choker. Chris Paul is good not good enough.
At some point you get diminishing returns, only one ball. Draymond doesn?t mind being number 4 because he has never been a number one, not even a number 2. boogie thinks he is just as good as any warrior and won?t be happy scoring 10 points a game because that means no max contract the next year.
He took a 1/$5 mill deal...you don't think he understand why he is there and what the goal is? He need to show that he can play in a team and is healthy. Again...Javale McGee and Nick Young played well in the Warriors system. Cousins was by all account a great teammate on the Olympic team and played very unselfishly.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtVVDKUsubk
Lakers with Lebron is not better than Cavs with Lebron.
best_potsticker_in_town said:Apparently Lakers doctors gave a "no" on Boogie. He had a serious injury and is currently slated to be back late December or January. Not saying that the Lakers should've passed...but anybody remember Dwight Howard? Came to the Lakers with a back injury that wasn't fully heeled and didn't play at the level expected.