irvinehomeowner
Well-known member
SoclosetoIrvine said:irvinehomeowner said:How have the Celts bounced back to prominence so quickly (and they have a top pick next year)?
Two words: No Kobe
It's not quite as simple as "No kobe" What Boston did was absolutely fleece the Nets in what may go down as one of the most lopsided trades of all time with an all time bad GM in Billy King. So you need a Billy King to rebuild quickly. That fool put no protections on those 1st round picks.
"The Brooklyn Nets have acquired Kevin Garnett, Paul Pierce, Jason Terry and D.J. White from the Boston Celtics in exchange for Gerald Wallace, Kris Humphries, MarShon Brooks, Kris Joseph, Keith Bogans and three first round draft picks (2014, 2016 and 2018), as well as the right to swap first round picks in 2017, Nets General Manager Billy King has announced"
So what the Celtics did value assets over loyalty. They traded away their face of their franchise in Paul Pierce/Kevin Garnett and looked toward the future. Lakers did the opposite and valued Kobe's past achievements and rewarded him for it and let him retire a Laker. So you can just say "no kobe" and expect us to suddenly do better. Which is ironic as well because Kobe's general terrible play the last few years netted us a lot of nice assets in Russell/Ingram in the draft lol. Looking back, I probably still keep Kobe those last few years. As a diehard fan, I would've thrown a fit if I saw a headline "Kobe traded to _____ for x player and this pick" even if it improved our future chances.
In Hindsight, we could've rebuilt much better with Kobe still on the roster. Few things that come to mind, we should've kept Ariza and just paid the man instead of getting Metta World. We so desperately need 3 & D and he's thriving in Houston. Isiah Thomas verbally said he wanted to be a Laker many times but he didn't sign him and his asking price for a trade was low. We could've rolled the dice on a Harrison barnes instead of Mozgov/Deng contracts. You also can't forget "Basketball reasons" which would've gotten us at the minimum chris paul with the assumed Dwight howard following. So it's not just "no kobe" it's really lots of more complicated reasons why we are where we are.
But looking ahead, we got the #2 pick in a stacked draft. Hope the lakers do their due diligence in workouts and don't shy away from a non Lonzo ball pick. If we can find a gem, you draft him (looking back on Porzingis vs Russell). We have a non too shabby core of Russell/Clarkson/Ingram/Randle/Zubac and we just need to build on it. Hope we don't trade young players for a Paul George and just wait for him to come in 2018 instead.
Heh... took the bait... spoken like a true Kobe fan.
I don't mind that the Lakers were loyal to Kobe, but no one wanted to play with him. He didn't make other players better... he needed better players to be here (and who could put up with him) to win.
I like how you mention the CP3 trade... do you really think that would have worked? CP3 and Kobe on the same team? And everyone forgets that the the Lakers would have lost Gasol in that trade... who is one of the biggest reason why Lakers were able to win their last championships in the first place.
Loyalty aside, if I wanted the Lakers to get back to prominence sooner than later, I would have let Kobe go. And yes, they should have done things like sign IT2 and not do those stupid Moz/Deng contracts. So maybe the two words should be "Jim Buss". But again, they did get Randle/Clarkson/Nance/Russell/Ingram. But I don't put too much into that, because top draft picks (esp #2s) are sort of no brainers (although most of the last 16 #2 picks haven't been very good).
[LakerWishHatOn] We do some 3-team trade with Boston and Indiana where we get IT2 and PG13.
#KobeHater