Irvinecommuter
New member
bones said:
Maybe but Irvine USD and TIC would certainly have incentives to push PP to SVUSD.
Irvine's 5th High School
- Thread starter akula1488
- Start date
NEW -> Contingent Buyer Assistance Program
Maybe but Irvine USD and TIC would certainly have incentives to push PP to SVUSD.
But it's really no skin off of Irvine or IUSD if GP got rezoned to SVUSD. A significant portion of GP was already zoned in there. The big losers would be the existing residents of PP and Five Points. Conversely, the TIC would clearly push for PP to be zoned into SVUSD.
Nonetheless...it will be interesting to see what happens. After all the times that FP has worked Irvine over on the GP, it will be interesting to see if Irvine can get one win.
If I was Irvine, I would threaten to move PP/GP to SVUSD unless GP gives IUSD a better piece of land than either Lot A or B.
Except SG is TIC so it's not happening. PP/GP is not TIC. Also geographically, it would be an odd cut-off...you would have to jump over Woodbury East and Stonegate East to get to Stonegate.
Definitely have not heard this...people with high school kids at SG I know are all going to Northwood.
But Northpark was already zoned into Tustin USD when it started. Ditto for Northpark Square.
I am not saying that PP is that far from SG. Just that TIC has a lot more sway over Irvine/IUSD than Five Points.
Did you go to the meeting?
http://www.talkirvine.com/index.php/topic,1845.msg225063.html#msg225063
No..it's not a done deal yet. The OCRegister article states that most of the blame is being placed on Agran and some on Five Point.
the IUSD articles states that:
The article talks about how the board is looking at alternate areas with TIC.
The other part of the issue is that IUSD may not want to go through this. They have to build a number of other schools within GP and would have to go through a similar process for each of those.
Also interesting because the location where Crean Lutheran High School is now would have been very good for IUSD. I wonder how Crean got that piece of land.
No...I assume you did then. I am just passing along my own knowledge of the situation.
I do know that SG Elementary is kicking out all non-SG kids starting next year.
Maybe but Irvine USD and TIC would certainly have incentives to push PP to SVUSD.
Irvinecommuter
New member
bones said:
But it's really no skin off of Irvine or IUSD if GP got rezoned to SVUSD. A significant portion of GP was already zoned in there. The big losers would be the existing residents of PP and Five Points. Conversely, the TIC would clearly push for PP to be zoned into SVUSD.
Irvinecommuter
New member
bones said:
Nonetheless...it will be interesting to see what happens. After all the times that FP has worked Irvine over on the GP, it will be interesting to see if Irvine can get one win.
If I was Irvine, I would threaten to move PP/GP to SVUSD unless GP gives IUSD a better piece of land than either Lot A or B.
J
jmoney74
Guest
It looks like political posturing too.. They will get it done.
So I already bought the house and hoping not to move again for a very long time. If it drops it drops.. lower property taxes. lol.
So I already bought the house and hoping not to move again for a very long time. If it drops it drops.. lower property taxes. lol.
J
jmoney74
Guest
Move SG kids over to Saddle back unified school as well. I would say.
Irvinecommuter
New member
jmoney74 said:
Except SG is TIC so it's not happening. PP/GP is not TIC. Also geographically, it would be an odd cut-off...you would have to jump over Woodbury East and Stonegate East to get to Stonegate.
Irvinecommuter
New member
test said:
Definitely have not heard this...people with high school kids at SG I know are all going to Northwood.
J
jmoney74
Guest
So is Northpark Irvine company.. but their kids have to go to Beckman TUSD?
PP is really far from SG though so it makes sense. 15 min extra to get to Woodbury towncenter. How do people even make it over to The Marketplace? Must take them an hour.
PP is really far from SG though so it makes sense. 15 min extra to get to Woodbury towncenter. How do people even make it over to The Marketplace? Must take them an hour.
Irvinecommuter
New member
jmoney74 said:
But Northpark was already zoned into Tustin USD when it started. Ditto for Northpark Square.
I am not saying that PP is that far from SG. Just that TIC has a lot more sway over Irvine/IUSD than Five Points.
Irvinecommuter said:
Did you go to the meeting?
http://www.talkirvine.com/index.php/topic,1845.msg225063.html#msg225063
Irvinecommuter
New member
bones said:
No..it's not a done deal yet. The OCRegister article states that most of the blame is being placed on Agran and some on Five Point.
the IUSD articles states that:
The article talks about how the board is looking at alternate areas with TIC.
The other part of the issue is that IUSD may not want to go through this. They have to build a number of other schools within GP and would have to go through a similar process for each of those.
Also interesting because the location where Crean Lutheran High School is now would have been very good for IUSD. I wonder how Crean got that piece of land.
Irvinecommuter
New member
test said:
No...I assume you did then. I am just passing along my own knowledge of the situation.
I do know that SG Elementary is kicking out all non-SG kids starting next year.
Irvinecommuter
New member
Bones: It seems like to me that they have been planning for Site A but Agran threw a wrench into approval. The superintendent's letter clearly states that:
Site A is the preferred site because the district went through 5 years of planning and it's very close to being shovel ready. Site B is nowhere near ready and has not even been cleared by the EPA. So, if the district scraps its plan for Site A, there needs to be alternative to either give up students or find an spot that is immediately ready.
The approval was for the adoption of the final EIR for Site A...it's basically the last major hurdle as to the environmental review.
The IUSD article stated that the 5th HS could be ready to go in 2016 if the district starts construct in August of this year. If not, it will not be ready.
Site A is the preferred site because the district went through 5 years of planning and it's very close to being shovel ready. Site B is nowhere near ready and has not even been cleared by the EPA. So, if the district scraps its plan for Site A, there needs to be alternative to either give up students or find an spot that is immediately ready.
The approval was for the adoption of the final EIR for Site A...it's basically the last major hurdle as to the environmental review.
The IUSD article stated that the 5th HS could be ready to go in 2016 if the district starts construct in August of this year. If not, it will not be ready.