sleepy5136
Well-known member
If China can build mass transit and have that be the dominant form of transportation, America has no excuse as to why it can't be done. Suburban neighborhoods in SoCal are not bigger than China.USCTrojanCPA said:Mass transit/public transportation sucks balls in SoCal and unfortunately most people need a car to get around SoCal because of suburban sprawl (which has increased with the work-from-home movement). Unfortunately the kind of higher inflation that we are seeing is hurting those folks on the lower side of the social economic status a lot worse than everyone else even with the higher entry level wages being offered (businesses are passing on those higher labor costs to customers).
People always get fixated on the cost of mass transit, but never understand the benefits of it. If you had mass transit, people on the lower side of the social economic status will benefit the most. They wouldn't need to pay for a car (car payments, insurance, gas, maintenance), they would have access to higher paying jobs in the city without needing to be stuck in traffic, living away from city but getting city pay means housing affordability isn't an issue, traffic would be less of a problem, more jobs to the economy, etc. Benefits far outweigh the cons, but of course, politics and lobbying by the car manufacturers get in the way of making any progress in mass transit.
Oh and not to mention that having mass transit would actually help with the obesity problem. Because it will force you to walk to the station and to your destination. Instead of sitting all day long.