qwerty said:
i have a 30 year fixed at 3.75, i redid the amort over the first five years of the loan using the 5/1 ARM rate 2.65% (making sizable lump sum payments at the end of every year for the first five years under both scenarios). after the first five years, i will have paid an extra 19K in interest (net of tax benefits) under the fixed 30 year vs the 5/1 ARM. Saving 19K over the first five years wasnt worth the peace of mind of having the flexibility of the 30 year. Im planning on paying off the loan in the first 10 years, so at most i would save 40K over 10 years (interest will be lower in years 6-10). but id rather have the flexibility of the 30 year fixed in the event that a life changing event happened and derailed my 10 year plan.
5 years better than chairman mao and josef stalin?
I think the important distinction you have above is that you always knew that you wanted to pull up and move prior to that 30 year period ending. Not everyone has that desire - for example, i took out a loan on my first home in 2001, and took out a 30 year fixed. I just refinanced it for a 15 year fixed at 4.125, since i know the tenant will pay it off.
I don't have the time to round up every loose end that the loan processors, underwriters and bank ask for. So i would rather have the peace of mind of the fixed rate, and re-fi as it becomes prudent.