<p><a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/66db756a-de5d-11dc-9de3-0000779fd2ac.html?nclick_check=1">US banks borrow $50bn via new Fed facility</a></p>
<p><em>US officials say the trend shows that financial authorities have become far more adept at channelling liquidity into the banking system to alleviate financial stress, after failing to calm money markets last year.</em></p>
<p><em>However, the move has sparked unease among some analysts about the stress developing in opaque corners of the US banking system and the banks’ growing reliance on indirect forms of government support.</em></p>
<p><em>“The TAF ... allows the banks to borrow money against all sort of dodgy collateral,” says Christopher Wood, analyst at CLSA. “The banks are increasingly giving the Fed the garbage collateral nobody else wants to take ... [this] suggests a perilous condition for America’s banking system.”</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/19/business/19banks.html"> Wall St. Banks Confront a String of Write-Downs</a></p>
<p><em>The deepening losses might make banks even more reluctant to make the loans needed to prod the slowing American economy. They also could force some banks to raise more capital to bolster their weakened finances.</em></p>
<p><em>The losses keep piling up. Leading brokerage firms are likely to write down the value of $200 billion of loans they have made to corporate clients by $10 billion to $14 billion during the first quarter of this year, Meredith Whitney, an analyst at Oppenheimer, wrote in a research report last week. </em></p>
<p><em>Those institutions and global banks could suffer an additional $20 billion in losses this year on commercial mortgage-backed securities and other debt instruments tied to commercial mortgages, according to <a title="More information about Goldman Sachs Group" href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/goldman_sachs_group_inc/index.html?inline=nyt-org">Goldman Sachs</a>, which predicts commercial property prices will decline by as much as 26 percent.</em></p>
<p><em>There has also been a marked deterioration in the market for commercial mortgage-backed securities, which are commercial mortgages packaged into bonds. </em></p>
<p><em>To some, the troubles plaguing commercial mortgage securities seem a logical extension of the turmoil in the residential real estate market. But some strategists argue that the commercial real estate market is not as vulnerable as the housing market. The pressure to package loans that was so evident in the residential market never materialized in the commercial market, these analysts say. </em></p>
<p><em>Also, commercial loans tend to be made at fixed, rather than adjustable, rates, and are not usually refinanced for long periods of time. </em></p>
<p><em>Nevertheless, the cost of insuring a basket of commercial mortgage-backed securities has soared. Last October, for example, it cost $39,000 to insure a $10 million basket of top rated 2007 commercial mortgages (super senior AAA, in Wall Street language) against default. </em></p>
<p><em>Today that price has increased to $214,000. For triple-B-rated commercial mortgage backed securities, those which are riskier, the cost of protection during the same time has soared from $672,000 to $1.5 million. </em></p>
<p><em>The deterioration of the CMBX, the benchmark index that tracks the cost of such credit protection, “started off as a fundamental repricing and then it escalated into something much more than that,” said Neil Barve, a research analyst at <a title="More information about Lehman Brothers Holdings" href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/lehman_brothers_holdings_inc/index.html?inline=nyt-org">Lehman Brothers</a>. “We think there is some downside in a challenging macroeconomic environment, but not nearly what has been priced in.” </em></p>
<p><em>Goldman Sachs seems to disagree, with analysts predicting commercial real estate loan losses to total $180 billion, with banks and brokers bearing $80 billion of that in total and about $20 billion this year. </em></p>
<p><em>Current index figures suggest that the banks will face significant pain. Brad Hintz, an analyst at Sanford C. Bernstein & Company, calculated that Lehman Brothers has the highest exposure to commercial real estate-backed securities, with $39.5 billion, followed by <a title="More information about Morgan Stanley" href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/morgan_stanley/index.html?inline=nyt-org">Morgan Stanley</a>, with $31.5 billion. (These numbers do not include hedges that the banks may have but do not disclose).</em> </p>