lawyerliz_IHB
New member
I think the other 2 countries are North and South Korea. The wildlife is
extremely rich and thriving in the no man's zone between the 2.
There are ecologist types that are thinking about keeping people outta
there after they stop fighting, if ever.
The fact that the species are thriving there in Chernoble sez, nude
nothwithstanding, that humans are more destructive to wildlife than
high radiation and a nuclear meltdown.
However, we are top predator of this planet and removing us altogether
would probably also have devastating effects, same as when you remove
the top predator anywhere (wolves, say).
The authors of 1491 say that far from the forest primeval, what the
arriving settlors found here was a ecosystem from which the top
predator--native americans--had been removed, and some of what
they saw wasn't such a good thing, tho of course they had no particular
expections of what they were going to see, except that it would be only
somewhat like the countries they came from. They had been removed
because of illnesses caught from the first explorers and fur traders long
before the settlers arrived. Of course, some remained, a pale shadow
of the numbers that were there before, especially in middle America
and the Incan area.
There really are too many people right now.
It would be a good idea to have other reserve areas where people
would be verbotten.
That doesn't mean people are bad. Other species have population
booms and crashes too. And some species manage to manage their
numbers. As with everything else, popuation booms are fun, but crashes,
are otherwise known as the 4 horsemen of the Appocalypse. Not
fun at all, unless you are Attila the Hun or Ghengis Khan.
extremely rich and thriving in the no man's zone between the 2.
There are ecologist types that are thinking about keeping people outta
there after they stop fighting, if ever.
The fact that the species are thriving there in Chernoble sez, nude
nothwithstanding, that humans are more destructive to wildlife than
high radiation and a nuclear meltdown.
However, we are top predator of this planet and removing us altogether
would probably also have devastating effects, same as when you remove
the top predator anywhere (wolves, say).
The authors of 1491 say that far from the forest primeval, what the
arriving settlors found here was a ecosystem from which the top
predator--native americans--had been removed, and some of what
they saw wasn't such a good thing, tho of course they had no particular
expections of what they were going to see, except that it would be only
somewhat like the countries they came from. They had been removed
because of illnesses caught from the first explorers and fur traders long
before the settlers arrived. Of course, some remained, a pale shadow
of the numbers that were there before, especially in middle America
and the Incan area.
There really are too many people right now.
It would be a good idea to have other reserve areas where people
would be verbotten.
That doesn't mean people are bad. Other species have population
booms and crashes too. And some species manage to manage their
numbers. As with everything else, popuation booms are fun, but crashes,
are otherwise known as the 4 horsemen of the Appocalypse. Not
fun at all, unless you are Attila the Hun or Ghengis Khan.
