Ready2Downsize
Well-known member
Liar Loan said:This tidbit caught my eye this morning:
In Phoenix, 32% of single-family purchases in January were by investors with fewer than 10 properties, up from 28% a year earlier, according to data from John Burns Real Estate Consulting. By comparison, large investor purchases accounted for 12% of transactions.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...-homeowners-use-cash-out-refis-to-buy-rentals
So 44% of all single-family homes in Phoenix are purchased by investors. A lot of this is funded by cheap cash-out refi's on other properties they own in other parts of the country (the point of the article). If investor demand dries up due to a combination of higher mortgage costs and renters missing payments due to nationwide job losses, it's going to have an outsized effect on the Phoenix market. This cycle has played out repeatedly, which is why Phoenix is more of a boom/bust market.
Phoenix has been boom and bust because they didn't have job growth. They have that now.
Alot of those investor homes were bought up by companies that rent out homes and it was cheaper to buy a house than to rent it when rents were rising. Now that rents are higher and rates are higher, they will just hand onto them. These are BIG companies that rent homes nationwide. It's like saying well the Irvine company has all these places they rent out and when rates rise they are going to have to SELL baby!
Maricopa is the fourth largest county in the country and there is a big difference between downtown phoenix and the area that is included in Phoenix metro. It's like saying Orange County is made up of Santa Ana, Garbage Grove, Anacrime there so Irvine must be overpriced and is headed for a cliff!
During the pandemic, The OC lost population (small amount) along with San Diego, Los Angeles and the Bay area. Maricopa county population went up by 1.7% and it has been going up for years. Phoenix/Chandler/Mesa went up over 2% and indeed the growth in Arizona is not in Phoenix. Phoenix is a lower income area that is built out. The newer areas are growing supported by jobs coming to the state. I know it's weird to think that companies are actually building new factories and offices when you're used to companies reducing their footprint in your state but it does still happen.
If Irvine population went up that much in one year, it would be 6000 new residents. If only 25% of those wanted to buy a house and you used 2000 of the residents as your household assuming some are single, couples and families that would be an additional 500 houses that would have to be built. That is in addition to what is already in demand from household formation and young people entering the market. Good thing the OC didn't see a population jump like that. Imagine the supply/demand ratio!