qwerty
Well-known member
irvinehomeowner said:bones said:I don't know if hybrid WILL be safer, but it CAN be safer. From the text, hybrid sounds like you stay with a fixed group of 15 kids in one classroom for <35% of traditional time versus more kids/more movement with the traditional. Opening has shown us that distancing and masks are effective. Without these "half ass" offerings though, full traditional wouldn't be an option at all, so if you are an IUSD parent who wants to get rid of your kids 5 days a week, thank the ones that will accept a crappy DL offering and those who want hybrid.
Well said. It's nice to see some people here understand logic.
Safer options allow the unsafer options to be more safe... or even be an option... exactly like what we are seeing with the reopening of the economy.
We may opt for distance learning... my kids are older so they can handle it. And it may be the new normal until we get proper vaccines/treatments (and who knows what new virus will land on our shores in the future).
Why would there be no school if they didn?t offer distance learning or a hybrid option? Physically being at school is either safe or not safe.
If it?s safe offer it, if it?s not safe don?t offer it.
So if there was no distance learning/hybrid option there would be no school at all?
The starting point is physically being at school. Not the other way around