Delano at Eastwood

NEW -> Contingent Buyer Assistance Program
irvinehomeowner said:
Burn That Belly said:
irvinehomeowner said:
This is where the location exception would occur for me.

If I had to buy *new*, I would pick a PS or GP detached over Delano.

If I didn't have to buy *new*, I would pick a resale over PG, GP or Delano. If it didn't have MRs, I could probably push my buy point up a little higher.

Well, we all can't have babyboomer-thinking right? Just like some die-hard folks love their Ford F-150 and will swear by it. But others prefer the utilitarian ultimate driving machine 3 series, even when brake jobs, oil changes cost 3 times as much.

How is that baby boomer thinking?

It?s practical, detached in an established hood with no MRs... good for any age buyer.

Millennials (22-37 yrs old according to Google) want new swaggers and think about the appreciation more than anything.
I'm a millenial too, but unlike the majority of them, I like resale homes more than new constructions for following reasons:

1. I can't fully predict what would be next to my home if I were to buy a new construction home. There might be electrical boxes, cell towers, another new contruction right in front, whatever I don't want.

2. There are upgrades already done in resale homes. Although some homes need lotta re-work done to fit my personal taste, there is a unicorn time to time.

3. I can sense what the neighbor feels like. This is kinda similar to reason #1. I can see if this is a type of neighbor I can see our family grow. Hard to do that with new homes although if it's near the end phases, there might be some sense of it.

4. No waiting period. I don't like to wait 6 months for my new home to be finished.

5. Less or no MR. I just can't see myself paying $10k MR.

6. Older homes usually have better floorplans with bigger yards (Sorry Irvinecommuter). Although I wouldn't buy homes built prior to 70s becuase of asbestos.

7. I can check who lives next door before closing.

Everyone is different and some people might not agree with my lists and that's totally fine.

If you must buy "new" I would say Delano is a good investment for the appreciation it already showed with each phase price rise and it is still out of stock. Although I think it has gone up too much, it seems like it would rise even more from here.



 
Mety said:
How do you post an image on the message instead of attachment?
upload the image to a webhost (i.e. www.imgur.com) then link directly to the .jpg/png/etc. with [img ]weblink[/img ]  (no spaces after img)
 
i1 said:
What?s more desirable about Eastwood vs Stonegate?
More FCB concentration, closer to trailer homes, more dense attached products, less established elementary for Eastwood? What am I missing?

No apartments.

But as IHS mentioned, trash gravy from Bowerman landfill will affect Eastwood more than Stonegate.

This topic was previously discussed here until YF self-imploded:http://www.talkirvine.com/index.php/topic,15322.msg310874.html#msg310874
 
Why EW is more desirable than Stonegate?  I thing it also has something to do with the new home they currently are selling.

When these under $1m new build attached and detached condos coming out at Eastwood,  Stonegte are already done with these type of products and moving on to mid priced large SFR, which are not what most first time buyer are looking for.  Thus the sale pace of new home at Stonegate was at snail pace compare to EW. 

These sub 1 million products are the hottest sector and EW is the only player in town West of 133 and zone to Northwood High. 

If Stonegate?s sub $1m products came out around the same times as EW?s, I think the popularity would be quite close.  As I recall, Saratoga, San Mateo, etc, was selling like hot cake too when they came out.


 
lnc said:
Why EW is more desirable than Stonegate?  I thing it also has something to do with the new home they currently are selling.

When these under $1m new build attached and detached condos coming out at Eastwood,  Stonegte are already done with these type of products and moving on to mid priced large SFR, which are not what most first time buyer are looking for.  Thus the sale pace of new home at Stonegate was at snail pace compare to EW. 

These sub 1 million products are the hottest sector and EW is the only player in town West of 133 and zone to Northwood High. 

If Stonegate?s sub $1m products came out around the same times as EW?s, I think the popularity would be quite close.  As I recall, Saratoga, San Mateo, etc, was selling like hot cake too when they came out.

Agree. I just don?t think it?ll translate at resale.

Unless maybe Donald Bren is providing lifetime, guaranteed Bowerman landfill trash gravy cleanup.

Bren is worth $16B on the back of TIC (10x the value of 5P) so that would be peanuts to show TIC?s philanthropy and humanity ( #btblogic )
 
Burn That Belly said:
... If I recall, YF said the city?s testing criteria was to test no more than 15ft...
Wait, wat? Had to do a double take. Haha

#cmonmagicj1zz
 
Burn That Belly said:
These little details make a big difference and when I see cost-cutting measures like that to save a few bucks, I wonder whether they even care. They could advertise a beautiful life on brochure but not if the homeowners don?t live long enough to see it through. Now I wonder what other corners did they cut? I mean the homes are cheaper than TICs products and labor is getting more expensive.
$67,000 for Gang Chen but no rain gutter for you.
 
Where is that trash gravy picture coming from? I can photoshop something look more authentic in 2 minuets.
I remember seeing similar fake pictures when SG was building. I think those are all FAKE NEWS.
 
Burn That Belly said:
Trash gravy is another fear mongering scare tactic far more laughable than the TCE beneath GP?s soil. If I recall, YF said the city?s testing criteria was to test no more than 15ft for TCE.

Anyways, aside from fear mongering hazards, we just need to focus on the immediate short term. And quite frankly missing drain pipes and roof gutters at GP?s home is sure as heck going to grow some incredible mold. We?ve already seen pictures of how these homes drain water and it is truly absolutely egregious how 5P is building their ?state-of the-art? home with no ethics and the well-being of residents in mind.

I sincerely hope their HOA litigation kicks off as soon as possible to provide relief. SoCal does see occasional days of flash flood and heavy rain. Mold is absolutely toxic to have around, especially young developing children.

These little details make a big difference and when I see cost-cutting measures like that to save a few bucks, I wonder whether they even care. They could advertise a beautiful life on brochure but not if the homeowners don?t live long enough to see it through. Now I wonder what other corners did they cut? I mean the homes are cheaper than TICs products and labor is getting more expensive.

Deflection at its finest.

Why are you bringing GP back into this? The current posts have been about Eastwood vs *Stonegate*.

Is it bad that I find the phrase "Trash Gravy" appetizing?
 
Back
Top