changm55
New member
if u take away all the craziness, racism, police brutality, and what nots in dorners manifesto, it still boils down to the age old question of "who watches the watchmen?"... and i can already see this playing out well in favor of the LAPD, so in essense dorners reforms mentioned in his manifesto are all for naught... in this particular case, if the public was to choose between a crazed cop killer vs an overpowerful/bearing LAPD, seems like they are choosing the latter...
in fact, this convo ur having with the other members of this forum is a good example too, seems like the other folks are all supporting the latter as well...
if u take away his guns, put him into a suit and have him preach 24-7 about his experiences with racism and corruption in the LAPD he'd probably garner a larger following and actually move policy... but if he just wanted to kill his foes, id write a book first and then go about shooting ppl, least the book will be a best seller for the time being... or if he wants to be burned into immortality, might as well fly to the white house lawn and set himself on fire there Tibetan style... but whatever... black guy shown "going down" on national tv probably just set the black community back 5 years... and to think he majored in political science too... =_=;;
in fact, this convo ur having with the other members of this forum is a good example too, seems like the other folks are all supporting the latter as well...
if u take away his guns, put him into a suit and have him preach 24-7 about his experiences with racism and corruption in the LAPD he'd probably garner a larger following and actually move policy... but if he just wanted to kill his foes, id write a book first and then go about shooting ppl, least the book will be a best seller for the time being... or if he wants to be burned into immortality, might as well fly to the white house lawn and set himself on fire there Tibetan style... but whatever... black guy shown "going down" on national tv probably just set the black community back 5 years... and to think he majored in political science too... =_=;;
nosuchreality said:First, let's make it clear, I have NO disdain for the officers conducting the manhunt.
I have questions on the apparent differences in the police handling of this case directed at them compared to the one directed at the general public. I don't remember that last major manhunt. I also don't remember that last time we fired up agencies across not only multiple counties, the Feds and multiple states. If this is standard procedure, then great. But I'm kind thinking back to just couple weeks ago with the hostage situation in the bunker in Alabama.
I also have questions on the media presentation of the information.
Liar Loan said:irvinehomeowner said:From what I remember, if there is a solid lead on a suspect and he/she in turn commits more violence, the manhunt becomes massive... regardless of who the victims are. Although, I would tend to agree that because there was an LAPD connection it got more press.nosuchreality said:3. Why did Dorner warrant a few hundred or thousand plus manhunt? Every other violent crime victim should be outraged, IMHO, at the double standard.
4. Why a million dollar reward in the first days? That seems completely abnormal too.
Have there been violent crimes in the past where the suspect was identified, he/she committed more violence and there was no manhunt?
I'm with IHO on this. How SHOULD the police have responded in this situation? They had a solid lead with a burning truck and a suspect that fled into difficult terrain. The public would have been outraged if the police had not thrown every available resource at this situation.
The police conducting the manhunt had nothing to do with the Torrance shootings, so you need to separate your disdain for the trigger-happy cops in Torrance from the cops risking their lives trying to capture this lunatic.