Allergy:
"Why would you even bother to visit such a forum as this one"
Because I'm interested in understanding the housing market and how/why the bubble was created. Up until around 6 months ago I knew very little about real-estate. I left CA before the bubble and when I started to think about moving back I looked at home prices and was very surprised at the prices! So, I started searching around the web and found this blog, housing panic, oc_fliptrack etc. Also, I don't get your comment about 4-bedrooms in Irvine. Are you under the impression that Irvine is high class and filled with Luxury homes? I consider Irvine just another California suburb (Its a nice one...but still just a suburb) and the vast majority of homes in Irvine rather typical.
"First of all, you must agree your example seems to be a little unbalanced when it comes to the prices you've quoted"
Sure the examples are a bit disconnected. Regardless, I don't see how being against lavish spending is being against capitalism. So if people stopped purchasing overpriced luxury items we'd no longer be a capitalistic economy? Also, what is and what isn't conspicuous consumption is relative to a culture/sub-culture/time period. Purchasing a BMW in your typical suburb is usually an example of conspicuous consumption, doing it in an area where the cheapest homes are 3 mil is most likely not. In such a community nobody is impressed by the BMW, but in the suburb they are.
"Now people who buy $10k purses usually don't care what you think and are not trying to show off as they are beyond that."
I think that is a laugh. The people that purchase handbags for $10k certainly aren't trying to show off to people like me, I wouldn't know a $10k bag from a $20 bag from Target. But they are certainly trying to show off to their peers, that is the ones that will know exactly how much the bag costs. Its a simple example of "tagging" in the animal kingdom. The bag gives others the ability to recognize that the person wearing it is part of a particular subculture. The tag isn't meant for me, its meant for the people that understand it, the people that they want to say "Hey look I'm part of the same group as you" to.
"Isn't comparing your accomplishments via publications, grants, tenure, etc., just as shallow as comparing your material wealth though?"
Yes and that was my point, different groups show status in different ways. Its very easy to see the status driven behavior of another group though, because you are looking in from the outside.
Reason:
"I am impress someone actually research the 'threads' to do a comeback. Instead of doing trivial research."
I wouldn't waste one second doing "research" about you on the forum. The fact is I've read this forum for months and having a fully functioning hippocampus I remember past conversations.
Also, if you don't like Chevy's, thats cool don't purchase one. But note I wasn't claiming that BMWs are bad cars, I was claiming they are too expensive for what you get. Not a single person on this thread has said anything that justifies the
cost premium for Lexus, BMW etc (I don't know though, the twisty argument almost got me). Also, regarding artwork. I said I didn't understand how its a good investment tool, I made a list of questions I don't know how to answer in the case of artwork. That is I'm fully admitting my ignorance! I would love to see an analysis that explains artwork (or other useables) as an investment tool, have you done one? Do you have a reference to one?