Brightwater Huntington Beach reduced 300k?

NEW -> Contingent Buyer Assistance Program
[quote author="IrvineRenter" date=1209525317]It would be a shame if we appeared higher in the search engine results for the repeated phrase...



Brightwater Community in Huntington Beach

Brightwater Community in Huntington Beach

Brightwater Community in Huntington Beach

Brightwater Community in Huntington Beach

Brightwater Community in Huntington Beach

Brightwater Community in Huntington Beach

Brightwater Community in Huntington Beach

Brightwater Community in Huntington Beach

Brightwater Community in Huntington Beach

Brightwater Community in Huntington Beach

Brightwater Community in Huntington Beach

Brightwater Community in Huntington Beach

Brightwater Community in Huntington Beach

Brightwater Community in Huntington Beach

Brightwater Community in Huntington Beach

Brightwater Community in Huntington Beach</blockquote>


Okay... my turn to play in this game...





Brightwater Community in Huntington Beach

Brightwater Community in Huntington Beach

Brightwater Community in Huntington Beach

Brightwater Community in Huntington Beach

Brightwater Community in Huntington Beach

Brightwater Community in Huntington Beach

Brightwater Community in Huntington Beach

Brightwater Community in Huntington Beach

Brightwater Community in Huntington Beach

Brightwater Community in Huntington Beach

Brightwater Community in Huntington Beach

Brightwater Community in Huntington Beach

Brightwater Community in Huntington Beach

Brightwater Community in Huntington Beach

Brightwater Community in Huntington Beach

Brightwater Community in Huntington Beach
 
:rofl:



Really though. I visited these units this last weekend and fell in love with the designs. Fantastic. However, this development will be a ghost-town before the year is up. Their 1 million dollar houses were smaller than condos...even fitted with 1 car garages. To get the 2 car garage you have to go up to the 1.2-1.5 million dollar places. And for 2 Mill you get a normal home. The land is just too expensive. It might take 10 more years to sell those lots.
 
To all the Cal Coastal and Hearthside homes employees, who did not change screen names and make ridiculous comments on the forums here, I am sincerely sorry to bring you the bad news from Q1. But, the company is toast, done, over, and in waaaaaaay too much debt. <a href="http://sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/840216/000110465908031321/a08-11259_110q.htm">From the Q1 one 10-Q</a>...



On September 15, 2006, the Company entered into a three-year, $100 Million Senior Secured Revolving Credit Agreement with KeyBank National Association, as a lender and agent for several other lenders (the ?Revolving Loan?). The Revolving Loan is secured by a first trust deed on the Brightwater project, and stock pledges of the Company?s material subsidiaries. The Revolving Loan will fund the first $100 million of development and construction costs for the project.



As of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, $67.0 million and $76.0 million, respectively, was outstanding under the Revolving Loan at weighted average rates of 5.10% and 6.90%, respectively, based upon the Company?s elected rates. Outstanding advances bear interest at the Company?s option at either (i) the Alternate Base rate (?Prime?) minus 25 basis points or (ii) LIBOR plus 200 basis points. As of March 31, 2008, the undrawn availability was $30.4 million. Interest on the facility is calculated on the average, outstanding daily balance and is paid monthly. <strong>Interest incurred on the Revolving Loan for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 was $900,000 and $500,000</strong>, respectively, at weighted-average interest rates of 5.64% and 7.32%, respectively. As of May 5, 2008, the RevolviLoan weighted average interest rate is 5.10%.



Beginning December 31, 2008 and at the end of each subsequent quarter, the commitment amount is scheduled to decrease by $25.0 million until the commitment under the Revolving Loan is reduced to zero by the final maturity date on September 15, 2009. The Revolving Loan is also subject to mandatory repayments and commitment reductions based on <strong>40% of the $600,000 release price on the first 50 units closed at the Brightwater project</strong>, and 40% of the $1 million release price per unit thereafter. These mandatory repayments are applicable to the commitment reductions set forth above. <strong>During the three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company delivered two homes at Brightwater and made mandatory repayments of $480,000. As of March 31, 2008, the Company has delivered 11 homes at Brightwater and made cumulative mandatory repayments of $240,000 per home, or $2.6 million.</strong>



The Company?s credit facilities currently require the Company to make $33.4 million in aggregate principal amortization payments by December 31, 2008, including $22.4 million for the Revolving Loan (assuming the Company draws the remaining $30.4 million which is available as of March 31, 2008) and $11.0 million for the Term Loan discussed in Note 5 below. <strong>In order to make these payments out of cash flow from operations, the Company would need to deliver approximately 50 homes at Brightwater during 2008, which appears unlikely based on sales orders to date, the number of homes currently under construction and the approximately eight months it takes to build the larger homes (The Cliffs and The Breakers). Therefore, the Company has initiated discussions with its lenders regarding potential amendments to the Revolving Loan that would defer a portion of its currently scheduled payments to future periods and modify certain covenants to accommodate the slower projected pace of sales. Amendments to the payment schedule will require the unanimous consent of the Revolving Loan bank syndicate. The Company is also evaluating alternatives for raising additional capital, if necessary. <u>There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in these endeavors, or that requested amendments to the Revolving Loan will be agreed to by the Company?s lenders. Current credit market conditions present uncertainty as to the ability of the Company to secure additional financing, if needed, and the terms of such financing if it is available, or as to the ability of the Company to achieve positive cash flow from operations to satisfy its obligations.</u></strong>



Under the Revolving Loan, the Company is required to comply with a number of covenants, including the following financial covenants which the Company considers to be the most restrictive of all of the debt covenants:



? a leverage covenant that prohibits the Company?s ratio of consolidated total liabilities to consolidated tangible net worth from exceeding the following:



Reporting Period Maximum Leverage Ratio

March 31, 2008 through June 30, 2008 2.50 to 1.0



September 30, 2008 and thereafter 2.25 to 1.0



? a minimum consolidated tangible net worth covenant of $80 million.



As of March 31, 2008, the Company?s consolidated total liabilities are $252.6 million, tangible net worth is $100.9 million and leverage ratio is 2.50. The Company is in compliance with the covenants of the Revolving Loan as of March 31, 2008.



As a result of the sustained downturn in the homebuilding industry and the $28.0 million of impairment charges the Company recorded during the third quarter of 2007, the Revolving Loan was amended, effective as of September 30, 2007, to reduce the tangible net worth covenant from $100 million to $80 million. In connection with the amendment, which was approved by 95% of the lenders, the Company paid a fee of $142,500 (.15%) and there was no change to the Company?s borrowing rate.



Availability under the $100 million Revolving Loan is subject to the applicable borrowing base limitations. The borrowing base limits lender advances to 50% of asset value. The borrowing base value is the appraised value of the Brightwater project, increased for costs incurred subsequent to the most recent lender appraisal and reduced by 72% of the sales value of homes delivered. As of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the borrowing base was $191.2 million and $186.1 million, respectively. Certain subsidiaries of the Company provided full unconditional guarantees.



As of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, approximately $500,000 and $600,000, respectively, of deferred loan fees and closing costs related to the Revolving Loan are included in other assets and amortized over the life of the loan. Amortization of these costs is included in the capitalization of interest allocated to real estate inventories when incurred, and charged to cost of sales when the related homes are delivered.



On September 15, 2006, the Company entered into a five-year, $125 Million Senior Secured Term Loan Agreement with KeyBank National Association, as a lender and agent for several other lenders (the ?Term Loan?), and on September 15, 2006, the Company borrowed the maximum loan amount of $125 million. The proceeds were used to fund a ?special dividend? of $12.50 per share, totaling $135.7 million, to common stockholders paid on September 28, 2006.



As of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, $121.0 million and $121.8 million, respectively, was outstanding under the Term Loan at rates of 5.81% and 7.5%, respectively, based upon the Company?s elected rates. The outstanding balance bears interest at the Company?s option at either (i) the prime interest rate plus 25 basis points, or (ii) LIBOR plus 275 basis points. Interest on the Term Loan is calculated on the average, outstanding daily balance and is paid monthly. <strong>Interest incurred on the Term Loan for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 was $2.0 million and $2.6 million,</strong> respectively, at weighted-average interest rates of 6.46% and 8.07%, respectively. As of May 5, 2008, the Term Loan interest rate is 5.5%.



On December 31, 2008, September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2010, the commitment amount will decrease by $15 million, $25 million, and $35 million, respectively. Thereafter, at the end of each subsequent quarter, the Term Loan commitment amount will decrease in four equal installments of $12.5 million, until the commitment under the agreement is reduced to zero by the final maturity date on September 15, 2011. The Term Loan is also subject to mandatory repayments based on 60% of the $600,000 release price on the first 50 units closed at the Brightwater project, and 60% of the $1 million release price per unit thereafter. These mandatory repayments are applicable to the commitment reductions set forth above. During the three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company delivered two homes at Brightwater and made mandatory repayments of $720,000. As of March 31, 2008, the Company has delivered 11 homes at Brightwater and made cumulative mandatory repayments of $4.0 million, or $360,000 per home.



As a result of the sustained downturn in the homebuilding industry and the $28.0 million of impairment charges the Company recorded during the third quarter of 2007, the Term Loan was amended, effective as of September 30, 2007, to reduce the tangible net worth covenant from $100 million to $80 million. The Term Loan was also amended to defer the phase-in of the minimum ratio of EBITDA to interest covenant from the first quarter of 2008 to the third quarter of 2008 to provide greater operating flexibility and accommodate the Company?s currently anticipated operating results for 2008. In connection with the amendment, which was approved by 100% of the lenders,<strong> the Company paid a fee of $187,500</strong>, and there was no change to the Company?s borrowing rate.



Cont...
 
The Company has also initiated discussions with its lenders to amend the Term Loan to modify certain covenants to accommodate the slower projected pace of sales. There can be no assurance that requested amendments to the Term Loan will be agreed to by the Company?s lenders. Current credit market conditions present uncertainty as to the ability of the Company to secure additional financing, if needed, and the terms of such financing if it is available, or as to the ability of the Company to achieve positive cash flow from operations to satisfy its obligations.



Availability under the Term Loan is subject to the applicable borrowing base loan to value limitations. The loan to value limits total lender advances under the Term Loan and the Revolving Loan to 65% of asset value. The borrowing base value is the appraised value of the Brightwater project, increased for costs incurred subsequent to the most recent lender appraisal and reduced by 72% of the sales value of homes delivered. As of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the borrowing base was $191.2 million and $186.1 million, respectively. The Term Loan is secured by a second trust deed on the Brightwater project, and a general pledge and assignment of the Company?s ownership interests in all material subsidiaries. All existing material subsidiaries of the Company have provided full unconditional guarantees. The Term Loan includes financial covenants which may limit the amount that may be outstanding.



As of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, <strong>approximately $1.9 million of deferred loan fees and closing costs related to the Term Loan are included in other assets and amortized over the life of the loan.</strong> Amortization of these costs is included in the capitalization of interest allocated to real estate inventories when incurred, and charged to cost of sales when the related homes are delivered.



Under the Term Loan agreement, the Company was required to enter into a swap agreement to hedge against risks associated with fluctuating interest rates related to $62.5 million of floating rate debt. On September 15, 2006 the Company entered into an interest rate swap transaction to effectively fix the interest rate on $62.5 million in floating rate debt at 8.015% per annum. The swap transaction terminates September 15, 2008. The swap did not qualify for hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133, ?Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities?. The fair value of the interest rate swap agreement represents the spread between the interest rate the Company paid and the interest rate the Company would receive over the remaining life of the agreement. As of March 31, 2008, the fair value of the swap agreement is approximately $700,000. <strong>The non-cash change in fair value of the interest rate swap agreement during the three months ended March 31, 2008 was approximately $500,000 and was charged to other expense. In addition, the Company recorded a $200,000 expense for cash payments made under the terms of the interest rate swap agreement during the first quarter of 2008 due to declining interest rates during the quarter. The counterparties to the interest rate swap agreement are financial institutions.</strong>
 
Okay, lets do some simple math here. First, they lost a chunk on their interest rate swap. They got duped into a swap, which they thought was good idea, but it is screwing them, and will probably screw them even more next quarter.



Anyway, they sold two Brightwater homes for $1.1mil each.

It costs $200K for the lot development.

$150 a sqft. to build, or for the two units in this quarter $278k each.

They need to pay $240k per home on the senior project revolver.

They need to pay $360k per home on the senior term loan.

Indirect costs on sales revenues are 6%, or $66k.



Now, I don't know if the cost basis in included in the lot development, but with the indirect costs, the total is $1.144mil per home. Yup, they are in the negative right off the bat. I can add in other fees and what not, but with only $1.2mil cash on hand, then I can wait for the BK. This company is truly on their last legs, and it doesn't seem likely they will be able to negotiate their debts. You would think that Ray would have learned from the past mistakes of the Kathryn and the Koll co. I guess they could raise some cash by selling more their common stock at $0.05.



Sorry, but these guys are done, over, finito.
 
<blockquote>During the three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company delivered two homes at Brightwater and made mandatory repayments of $480,000. As of March 31, 2008, the Company has delivered 11 homes at Brightwater and made cumulative mandatory repayments of $240,000 per home, or $2.6 million. </blockquote>


Two homes for the quarter, ouch.



<blockquote>In order to make these payments out of cash flow from operations, the Company would need to deliver approximately 50 homes at Brightwater during 2008, which appears unlikely based on sales orders to date, the number of homes currently under construction and the approximately eight months it takes to build the larger homes (The Cliffs and The Breakers). Therefore, the Company has initiated discussions with its lenders regarding potential amendments to the Revolving Loan ... </blockquote>


Sounds like their options are to dip into their cash reserves (were there any?), get the loans modified, or default.



Ironically, that sounds like a lot of the option-ARM borrowers in the last couple years.
 
I wonder how many people were detered from buying by looking

at this blog. They may have been kept in business for another 2-3

months without us.



Bad us, in being so mean to



Brightwater at Huntington Beach.
 
[quote author="No_Such_Reality" date=1210538858]Sounds like their options are to dip into their cash reserves (were there any?), get the loans modified, or default.



Ironically, that sounds like a lot of the option-ARM borrowers in the last couple years.</blockquote>


They have $1.2mil in cash, down from $24.3mil in the last quarter. They made some big payments to their loans this quarter.



Their only option to avoid BK is to get the loan payments deferred, but they have modified their loans once already. They could issue more stock, but they might have some trouble with that too.



I would go short on these guys, but it looks like the fun is already over. Well, for this quarter that is. That, and the stock trades at such a low volume.



<img src="http://www.marketwatch.com/charts/int-adv.chart?symb=CALC&sid=149863&time=3&startdate;=&enddate;=&freq=7&comp;=&compidx=aaaaa~0&uf=0&ma=1&maval=50&type=4&size=1&lf=16&lf2=4&lf3=0&style=1013&mocktick=1&rand=953849434" alt="" />
 
Nothing we are saying here is mean. These are nice houses...but just at a price point just for executives. But there aren't enough executives to go around the 1.5 to 3 million dollar homes in Orange County. Not even wanabees with 0% down 0 doc can buy these any more.



btw, the 1.2M houses are the small ones. 1.6-2.0M are the medium ones and 1.9-3.1M are the big ones. (May's pricing).
 
[quote author="lawyerliz" date=1210564458]I was snarking.



By the way, does snark come from Lewis Carrol?

</blockquote>


<a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=snark">Snark</a>



<a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=snarkenfreude">Snarkenfreude</a>



<a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=snarkfest">Snarkfest</a>



<a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=snarkasm">Snarkasm</a>
 
[quote author="graphrix" date=1210520790]Okay, lets do some simple math here. First, they lost a chunk on their interest rate swap. They got duped into a swap, which they thought was good idea, but it is screwing them, and will probably screw them even more next quarter.



Anyway, they sold two Brightwater homes for $1.1mil each.

It costs $200K for the lot development.

$150 a sqft. to build, or for the two units in this quarter $278k each.

They need to pay $240k per home on the senior project revolver.

They need to pay $360k per home on the senior term loan.

Indirect costs on sales revenues are 6%, or $66k.



Now, I don't know if the cost basis in included in the lot development, but with the indirect costs, the total is $1.144mil per home. Yup, they are in the negative right off the bat. I can add in other fees and what not, but with only $1.2mil cash on hand, then I can wait for the BK. This company is truly on their last legs, and it doesn't seem likely they will be able to negotiate their debts. You would think that Ray would have learned from the past mistakes of the Kathryn and the Koll co. I guess they could raise some cash by selling more their common stock at $0.05.



Sorry, but these guys are done, over, finito.</blockquote>
Great break down.



If it was 2 of the smaller units that sold, the developer loan amounts might be a lil lower...smaller lots.



$278k is about right for how much it take to build those smaller units. They do build a nice house.



But, 200k for grading and utilities for the lot are just insane. wth? It's just a typical tract lot...in the inland empire the same amount of grading and utilities would run only a quarter of that.



As for the developer loans for the land...that's just nuts. How much did they buy this tract for? From earlier pages on this thread it sounded like the original developer got this land for dirt cheap.
 
I know this isn't Brightwater Huntington Beach but it is close and I got so fumed about it that I wanted to see if it was true. My friend who lives in this complex says this owner skipped town to Tahiti with a million in Countrywides money. They left their 2 new Mercedes in the driveway and let the whole thing go back to all the banks. Can anyone look up the finance on this home and see if that is in fact what happened? If so this totally tee'd me off



http://www.redfin.com/CA/HUNTINGTON-BEACH/5722-OCEAN-VISTA-DR-92648/home/3139356
 
ugh, they should fire whoever took those photos. everything's grey. just because some neighborhoods these days feel that way doesnt mean they need to emphasize the abandoned ruins feel.
 
[quote author="morekaos" date=1212024450]Hey IR2 or someone with access to checking the loans on property look at this one for me. A friend of mine was thinking of bidding on this place and I think it may be a bit of a trap...Thanks. Besides, I miss this thread, it was funny



http://www.redfin.com/CA/HUNTINGTON-BEACH/5722-OCEAN-VISTA-DR-92648/home/3139356</blockquote>


Here you go:



<a href="http://irvinerealtorsite.com/5722oceanvista.JPG">Sales and loan history</a>



edited to remove names.
 
<span style="color: red;"><span style="font-size: 14px;"><strong>IR2 you rock!!! </strong></span></span>Am i reading that right and there are 2.1 mil in loans or were the 2 small ones pay offs on the biggie?
 
[quote author="morekaos" date=1212057468]Am i reading that right and there are 2.1 mil in loans or were the 2 small ones pay offs on the biggie?</blockquote>


That's where the mystery lies. The recording takes place to show initial amounts of loans. They don't show what the $$$ went to. There could have been (in 2006) $2.1M against it. Or the subsequent loan could have been part of a recasting of some original loaned cash. We only get a small picture when we look at recorded stuff. The sellers might have been paying off $100K/month for all we know; we wouldn't see it.



But you use the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_Razor">Occam's Razor</a> rule of thumb and figure that those loans were probably not paid down much if any...



The bank took it back now, though, so those liens are gone. Their REO crew will decide what to do when they get to it, in the stack of many, many others.
 
Like i said in a previous post these scumbags ran off to Tahiti so I imagine those loans got transferred to the Caymans in 2006. Oh well another dumb loan officer and Countrywide will hold this bag. Thanks again I knew I could rely on my IHB crew to smoke this one out
 
Back
Top