oceanmonkey said:i think the ratio for 1m+ and 1m- homes are off at beacon park. that could contribute to current not so good sales.
Elaborate?
oceanmonkey said:i think the ratio for 1m+ and 1m- homes are off at beacon park. that could contribute to current not so good sales.
bones said:oceanmonkey said:i think the ratio for 1m+ and 1m- homes are off at beacon park. that could contribute to current not so good sales.
Elaborate?
Perspective said:bones said:oceanmonkey said:i think the ratio for 1m+ and 1m- homes are off at beacon park. that could contribute to current not so good sales.
Elaborate?
I think the buyer pool in the mid-$1Ms is so thin. At $1.5M with $10K in mello roos, your household income needs to be above $300K to finance 80% for 30 years at 4%. I don't know what percentage of prospective Irvine buyers meet that qualification, but it probably places you in the top 3% of earning households nationwide.
Maybe if you're already an Irvine homeowner, you can parlay hundreds of thousands of equity in your current house to move-up on a lower household income. That probably places you well above your 40s. Is this really the time of your life to take on that much more debt and $10K in mello roos?
I know Irvine has bucked these stats for the last few years, but there is a ceiling. The Ability to Repay rules have made the ceiling less elastic too. Even if a $250K household has 20% to put down on a $1.5M Beacon Park house, the interest-only and/or negative amortization loans are not available to allow them to over-extend themselves.
I think you a spot on. That said, while people might quality at those amounts, I'm sure plenty would want to make more than that if they were going to buy that size house. If I were going to 1.5 (I'd want to make at least 400-500K and be putting at least 30% down and still have significant reserves for landscaping / other options). I certainly wouldn't be comfortable at 1.5 with those mella's at 300K. Then again, I'm conservative, but 5 times gross income seems on the high side (especially when you factor in the mella). I suppose it is doable and I'd be interested in what the average Irvine resident's income to house ratio is, but you aren't going to being saving near as much for retirement, kids college, etc, with a ratio of 5 to 1.Perspective said:bones said:oceanmonkey said:i think the ratio for 1m+ and 1m- homes are off at beacon park. that could contribute to current not so good sales.
Elaborate?
I think the buyer pool in the mid-$1Ms is so thin. At $1.5M with $10K in mello roos, your household income needs to be above $300K to finance 80% for 30 years at 4%. I don't know what percentage of prospective Irvine buyers meet that qualification, but it probably places you in the top 3% of earning households nationwide.
Maybe if you're already an Irvine homeowner, you can parlay hundreds of thousands of equity in your current house to move-up on a lower household income. That probably places you well above your 40s. Is this really the time of your life to take on that much more debt and $10K in mello roos?
I know Irvine has bucked these stats for the last few years, but there is a ceiling. The Ability to Repay rules have made the ceiling less elastic too. Even if a $250K household has 20% to put down on a $1.5M Beacon Park house, the interest-only and/or negative amortization loans are not available to allow them to over-extend themselves.
IrvineRealtor said:A question to the 5P builders that lurk here on the blog:
How many people do you think we usually have in the shower at one time?
Those master bathroom shower sizes are out of control.
-IR2
Bullsback said:I think in this current market, where prices are stagnating and uncertainty exists around rates (which could further impact pricing), you don't have a lot of incentive to jump in (if you are move up buyer) unless you find the perfect home (and from talking to sales people...it seems like a much greater percentage of buyers in the new SFR class are looking for their "perfect" home and less willing to buy the first plan they like in their price range on whatever "blah" lot exists).
yaliu07 said:any chance that builder will LOWER their price???
Perspective said:bones said:oceanmonkey said:i think the ratio for 1m+ and 1m- homes are off at beacon park. that could contribute to current not so good sales.
Elaborate?
I think the buyer pool in the mid-$1Ms is so thin. At $1.5M with $10K in mello roos, your household income needs to be above $300K to finance 80% for 30 years at 4%. I don't know what percentage of prospective Irvine buyers meet that qualification, but it probably places you in the top 3% of earning households nationwide.
Maybe if you're already an Irvine homeowner, you can parlay hundreds of thousands of equity in your current house to move-up on a lower household income. That probably places you well above your 40s. Is this really the time of your life to take on that much more debt and $10K in mello roos?
I know Irvine has bucked these stats for the last few years, but there is a ceiling. The Ability to Repay rules have made the ceiling less elastic too. Even if a $250K household has 20% to put down on a $1.5M Beacon Park house, the interest-only and/or negative amortization loans are not available to allow them to over-extend themselves.
hello said:Perspective said:bones said:oceanmonkey said:i think the ratio for 1m+ and 1m- homes are off at beacon park. that could contribute to current not so good sales.
Elaborate?
I think the buyer pool in the mid-$1Ms is so thin. At $1.5M with $10K in mello roos, your household income needs to be above $300K to finance 80% for 30 years at 4%. I don't know what percentage of prospective Irvine buyers meet that qualification, but it probably places you in the top 3% of earning households nationwide.
Maybe if you're already an Irvine homeowner, you can parlay hundreds of thousands of equity in your current house to move-up on a lower household income. That probably places you well above your 40s. Is this really the time of your life to take on that much more debt and $10K in mello roos?
I know Irvine has bucked these stats for the last few years, but there is a ceiling. The Ability to Repay rules have made the ceiling less elastic too. Even if a $250K household has 20% to put down on a $1.5M Beacon Park house, the interest-only and/or negative amortization loans are not available to allow them to over-extend themselves.
In my opinion even a household with a 300K income should not be buying a 1.5M dollar house in beacon park. Even with a 20% down, the PITI + HOA here will be near 8,500 a month. After mortgage tax savings, the house may cost about 7200 a month. However this doesnt take into consideration maintenance costs nor costs to furnish, landscape, etc. We all know a house will cost more than we expect... Plus the mortgage deductions will get smaller and smaller every year...
With a 300K yearly income, a household will likely net about 15K a month take home after taxes. SO that house will eat up half of your take home. If you want to put in for retirement, college savings, a vacation here or there, a new car, dinners, piano lessions for little baby, etc, etc I cant imagine there will be much left for savings... Perhaps I am too conservative, but I wouldnt feel comfortable knowing I didnt have much room for error...
qwerty said:our gross monthly payment (PITI + HOA) was 8% of average monthly gross wages for 2014. that is why i go to bed happy every night. but i cant afford irvine
ps9 said:qwerty said:our gross monthly payment (PITI + HOA) was 8% of average monthly gross wages for 2014. that is why i go to bed happy every night. but i cant afford irvine
Nice, PBR was probably higher right?
qwerty said:our gross monthly payment (PITI + HOA) was 8% of average monthly gross wages for 2014. that is why i go to bed happy every night. but i cant afford irvine
bones said:qwerty said:our gross monthly payment (PITI + HOA) was 8% of average monthly gross wages for 2014. that is why i go to bed happy every night. but i cant afford irvine
Haha. I go to bed happy every night too.
irv81 said:just visited ellwood and i agree with most folks that the rooftop is a interesting idea. Anyone had concerns about possible greenhouse effect from all the windows? Overall, despite high MR, it seems great bang for your buck. Right now deciding between Laurel cypress village, strada OH and ellwood beacon park.
it is hard to get a feel for the community as everything around is construction, but given this price, i'm leaning for ellwood.